Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   Build Quality Issues (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/6749-build-quality-issues.html)

havasuwiley 07-20-2009 11:47 PM

i think fit and finish are fine on the 370z,much better than my 03 vette,wifes 09 maxima is tight,but has large trunk gaps.

Pushing_Tin 07-20-2009 11:58 PM

I'm very picky. I have owned nothing but new cars for over a decade. One of my most recent cars was a 2006 Lexus IS350 and the build quality is nearly identical to my Z. The only issues I have had is a persistent rattle in the rear and condensation in the right rear tail light in the winter. I do have some bitches about available options, but that has been discussed at length. All in all I am very pleased with the quality.

edeeZee 07-21-2009 09:27 AM

The Japanese are renowned for being assiduous when working and do not mess around. Americans on the other hand aren't really the opposite, but we're not quite up to par with the Japanese in that sense. Sorry, I don't mean to sound unpatriotic. I do not speak from hearsay or 2nd hand experience. When I was in the Marines stationed in Japan for a year, I seen how the Japanese culture instill in its people seriousness when working. Go to a fast food restaurant in Japan and you'll see what I mean. Typically, in an American fast food restaurant, the people who work there show reluctance and drag their feet--they do a sh&tty job in a cursory, botched manner many times.

I remember in college, in my statistics class, my professor started with an anecdote the very first day of class. He explained why the Japanese economy during the 60's,70's and into the 80's was on the verge of eclipsing the U.S. The Japanese are the "masters of mass production" I recall him saying. To make the long story short, he said the Japanese control variances (keep it to a minimum) in mass production perhaps better than any other industrialized country in the world, hence their reputation for building durable automobiles, electronics and other consumer products.

Sorry for my digression. I coincidently have the exact same problem as the TS in how my body panels don't line up perfect, the driver side side skirt. I'm going to overlook this because I don't want to work myself over this. And I agree with the 2nd post, this ain't a $100,000+ high end Euro car, you get what you pay for--an affordable sports car trying to emulate a $100,000 sports car.

SiXK 07-21-2009 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaws12 (Post 116338)
Reading the replies to my original post is making me a bit annoyed.

First of all, I agree with the fact that "Quality" has nothing to do with features.

I have owned all of the high-end sports cars accept Aston Martin, Lambo, and Ferrari. I currently own a 2008 C2S Cab and I have owned many P-cars, Vettes, AMGs, M cars, XKR, Maserati, etc... I am fortunate enough to afford whatever car I choose.

If you think quality has to do with features than Porsche would have awful quality. Unless you pay crazy prices for options they come pretty bare bones (manual seats, crappy stereo, no bluetooth, no heated seats, etc...). But the car screams quality because it is put together well.

Vettes have terrible quality and they are priced much higher than a Z. Crappy interior, outdated NAV/Stereo, awful seats, etc... They rattle and squeak like crazy. Great car, great fun, but quality is sad.

I bought the Z as a daily driver that is fun, comfortable, and reliable. I can leave it at the airport or shopping mall and not panic about whats happening with it. But it still is a $40k car (fully loaded) or at worst a mid-$30ks car) and should be assembled as well as an Infiniti or Lexus in the same price range, considering it is made in Japan in the same factory as the G37 I believe. To me the car's greatest selling points are the bang for buck factor and the beautiful lines of the car. Great value. But if it isn't put together well it ruins the experience, and, quite honestly, the competition in this pricepoint is fierce (RX8, Camaro SS, Base Vette, G, Z4, Mustang GT, Genesis Coupe, 135, etc...) and, while I chose the Z and feel it is the better of all of the competition, I expect to have a car that is put together well.

After 1 week, I have had the original car replaced because of a huge paint defect from the factory, the factory splash guards not fit properly, the body panels not aligned, crooked exhaust tips. All minor and easily fixed, but makes me worry about reliability and longevity.

Sorry so long, but I don't like when people where blinders or feel the need to justify deficiencies so they dont feel inferior. Expect quality and demand it, you will be suprised how much you get.

I agree with you that the car should be put together well. parts should fit. To answer your question, I do not have any of those issues with mine. The body panels are fine, everything is straight - the exhaust, splash shields, etc... I wonder if your car took a bump or something that knocked some stuff out of whack? Overall the build quality of this car is good IMO. I do have one slight rattle from the trunk area.

Robert_Nash 07-21-2009 01:04 PM

With the possible exception of a hand-built vehicle where attention to fit and finish is beyond meticulous; any car at any price level can (and some will) have fit/finish issues; it's simply the nature of mass production...manufacturers try to catch such things before they leave the factory floor but I doubt any manufacturer catches them all no matter how hard they try.

Overall, Japanese built vehicles have a high fit and finish grade but that does not mean that there won't be problems on some individual vehicles and that is assuming, of course, that any body-panel misalignment, etc. stems from the assembly itself and not from any other factors that can contribute.

To the OP; I hope you get whatever issues you do have addressed by your dealer!

cave vulture 07-21-2009 01:27 PM

Trunk rattle....
 
How about that trunk rattle? Mine seems to be coming from the passenger side rear. Anybody got any ideas what might be causing the rattle?

Alexus 07-21-2009 01:30 PM

You should also keep in mind that as you put the km on your car, the pannels might shift a little under the flex and strain. This can be good or bad, but I'm just putting it out there.

mrarroyo 07-21-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by havasuwiley (Post 120119)
i think fit and finish are fine on the 370z,much better than my 03 vette,wifes 09 maxima is tight,but has large trunk gaps.

Interesting, I find that my 04 Vette was better put together than the 370Z. :confused:

initialgemini 07-21-2009 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaws12 (Post 116338)
Reading the replies to my original post is making me a bit annoyed.

First of all, I agree with the fact that "Quality" has nothing to do with features.

I have owned all of the high-end sports cars accept Aston Martin, Lambo, and Ferrari. I currently own a 2008 C2S Cab and I have owned many P-cars, Vettes, AMGs, M cars, XKR, Maserati, etc... I am fortunate enough to afford whatever car I choose.

If you think quality has to do with features than Porsche would have awful quality. Unless you pay crazy prices for options they come pretty bare bones (manual seats, crappy stereo, no bluetooth, no heated seats, etc...). But the car screams quality because it is put together well.

Vettes have terrible quality and they are priced much higher than a Z. Crappy interior, outdated NAV/Stereo, awful seats, etc... They rattle and squeak like crazy. Great car, great fun, but quality is sad.

I bought the Z as a daily driver that is fun, comfortable, and reliable. I can leave it at the airport or shopping mall and not panic about whats happening with it. But it still is a $40k car (fully loaded) or at worst a mid-$30ks car) and should be assembled as well as an Infiniti or Lexus in the same price range, considering it is made in Japan in the same factory as the G37 I believe. To me the car's greatest selling points are the bang for buck factor and the beautiful lines of the car. Great value. But if it isn't put together well it ruins the experience, and, quite honestly, the competition in this pricepoint is fierce (RX8, Camaro SS, Base Vette, G, Z4, Mustang GT, Genesis Coupe, 135, etc...) and, while I chose the Z and feel it is the better of all of the competition, I expect to have a car that is put together well.

After 1 week, I have had the original car replaced because of a huge paint defect from the factory, the factory splash guards not fit properly, the body panels not aligned, crooked exhaust tips. All minor and easily fixed, but makes me worry about reliability and longevity.

Sorry so long, but I don't like when people where blinders or feel the need to justify deficiencies so they dont feel inferior. Expect quality and demand it, you will be suprised how much you get.

I agree with you. Unfortunately, not everyone has the same expectations for quality and to be fair, we all rate quality in different ways.

Pushing_Tin 07-21-2009 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrarroyo (Post 120993)
Interesting, I find that my 04 Vette was better put together than the 370Z. :confused:

I test drove a new 08 C6 and coldn't believe how craptastic the intertior was! It was one of the deciding factors in not buying one. It also had condensation in BOTH headlights.

Jason Burton 07-21-2009 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 116084)
Beats the crap out of my old Mustang.

My sentiments exactly... even with the short time I've had my Z (1700 miles) I'm much more satisfied with the build quality and overall execution as compared to my '07 Mustang GT.

ZKindaGuy 07-21-2009 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaws12 (Post 116072)
Since discovering the gapping problem with my factory installed splash guards, which are all being replaced under warranty because they are "deformed" according to my tech, I really have started going over the car with a fine tooth comb.

I have been checking the body panel fitment and have noticed that space seperating the panels on the rear quarter in front of the rear wheels is misaligned. I actually spent an hour gently pully and pushing to get the panels to line up. I hope they stay in the position I got them to.

That, along with my off-center passenger side exhaust tip, makes me wonder if anyone else is disappointed in the build quality. I have ZERO rattles, no mechanical issues, just body fitment issues.

Am I alone in this?

Wow....you folks looking for "gaps" would have never have been able to get a wink of sleep if you had been born or old enough to drive in the 60's, 70's and
80's. The cars made in those days never had a panel on the car that wasn't creating some kind of noticeable gap. Fitment in those days would have driven you folks insane! :eek:

ArtVandaleigh 07-22-2009 12:50 PM

I have the same type of faint rattle coming from the hatch too. It's almost like the interior plastic surrounding the rear window is constantly making contact with something.

Pushing_Tin 07-22-2009 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtVandaleigh (Post 121589)
I have the same type of faint rattle coming from the hatch too. It's almost like the interior plastic surrounding the rear window is constantly making contact with something.

It seems like 50% of the cars have this same rattle.

bluzman 07-22-2009 02:48 PM

50% of the 370Zs?? I call BS.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2