![]() |
So i've been reading that the next gen is going to be maybe smaller in size, leaner and instead of using the current 3.7 liter v6, they are going to
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kommie kali
Posts: 1,238
Drives: 2015 Audi S5; 6spd.
Rep Power: 10325 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
So i've been reading that the next gen is going to be maybe smaller in size, leaner and instead of using the current 3.7 liter v6, they are going to use a turbo 4.
Personally i don't like that idea. I would like them to improve on the v6 if possible. What do you guys think?
__________________
Mudders milk ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 403 Forbidden
Posts: 2,512
Drives: 2009 NISMO 370Z
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I prefer Turbo Charged I/V 4 over v6 anyday! The weakness of the current 370z is lack of torque. 270 Ib/ft torque is bit outdated. I hope next gen z will fix that. Bottom line is FI FTW!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,659
Drives: '13 CTS-V, '76 Vette
Rep Power: 27 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I think DI is the next upgrade to increase HP/TQ. A turbo 4 imho is a step backwards. May as well turbo/sc the V6.
__________________
"America.... still builds rockets!" Vette: 355 cid, 400 rwhp '13 CTS-V Coupe: 6.2L LSA, 556HP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
a turbo 4 will not be adequate. Nissan doesn't have a turbo 4 in their stable large enough to pull duty. Realistically, I see a direct injected V6 continuing to use VVEL, possibly growing to 3.8L. I wouldn't be surprised if we see 100hp per liter. I do see a move from a steel frame to an aluminum which will drop at least 100lbs, most likely more. Moving to aluminum across their entire lineup sharing the same front midship platform will assist in keeping costs down. It will also increase their fuel economy as standards rise.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,103
Drives: Classified
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
heck a $20 bleed valve on an evo will put it up with a stock Z easily |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I obviously have or I wouldn't have made my argument. Your comparing a modified car to a proposed factory car. So tell me again at what rpm the turbo begins to spin? The rest of the world does not want to wait for power, when the gas is pressed, they want the desired results now, not in a few seconds.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 837
Drives: sideways
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
-CDepp- 2011 MB Base+S M6 | Invidia Exhaust | TommyKairaHebiBeibi | H&R Spacers 15/20 | GTR Start | 305hp/240tq |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | ||
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 302
Drives: 09 370Z TourSport MT
Rep Power: 250 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
HP/$ does not equal Performance/$ sorry...Ford has proven that by building a strait line performer not an all around sports car. I am talking about handling in case I'm not implying it. Please do not mention the Boss 302 as it is not in the price point of the Z and therefore irrelevant.
__________________
Mazda Rx8 MT Titanium - SOLD! 2009 370Z T-Sport MT Black - Takeda Intake, Swift springs, Rear Camber kit, SS B Lines, FI Exhaust, Z Speed CMAK Flywheel/Clutch Kit, Stillen Brake Cooling. Last edited by cavemancan; 12-27-2012 at 10:40 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 40,963
Drives: HypeTrain Choo Choo!
Rep Power: 142 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I am curious what your information is based on...please enlighten us. Not to mention...Boss 302: Boss 302 2dr Car 6-speed Manual $38,930 invoice 370Z...you can tack another $3k on these price, as they DO NOT include the sport package Base 2dr Car 6-speed Manual $31,026 $33,120 Base 2dr Car 3.7L V6 RWD 7-speed Automatic $32,242 $34,420 Touring 2dr Car 3.7L V6 RWD 6-speed Manual $35,027 $37,820 Touring 2dr Car 3.7L V6 RWD 7-speed Automatic $36,229 $39,120 NISMO 2dr Car 3.7L V6 RWD 6-speed Manual $40,182 $43,020 Oops...hell, the getting Touring or the Nismo costs MORE! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 55,385
Drives: on two wheels
Rep Power: 6963 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
wat
__________________
- Steve ![]() Zs & Coffee - Saturdays at 10AM in Fairfax, VA and Columbia, MD (Click the banner!) LIKE us on Facebook! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 632
Drives: 2010 PW 370z
Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I think it depends on what Nissan decides they want to pit the car against. If they want to continue to compete with the Mustang/Camaro/Genesis (at least in price) then we're going to see a beefed up V6, maybe forced induction, maybe not.
If they decided to take it in an FRS/BRZ direction then we're going to see a smaller, lighter Z with a turbo 4. That's my opinion at least.
__________________
K&N Drop-Ins, Z1 Post-MAF Tubes, FI 18" CF TDX, TWM Short Throw Shifter w/ A6 Leopard Knob, 'esfourteen' clutch helper spring, 'kellyefields' hood struts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kommie kali
Posts: 1,238
Drives: 2015 Audi S5; 6spd.
Rep Power: 10325 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
From what i read and from the link i provided, the boss from nissan wants to appeal to a wider range of people.
It seems more than likely i think they want the FRS/BRZ market instead of competing with the stangs, cameros and genesis. I hope they keep the v6 and use di. Quote:
__________________
Mudders milk ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|