![]() |
When I decided I was going to buy a new car, I actually was planning to get a shiny new 2013 Evo. However, when I test drove one, I was
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 212
Drives: '13 Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
When I decided I was going to buy a new car, I actually was planning to get a shiny new 2013 Evo. However, when I test drove one, I was surprised by how noisy it was and how underwhelming it felt. I kept thinking back to the automatic (<-- !!!) 370Z I drove earlier that morning and how much more fun it was to drive.
I went in to that test driving day planning to hate the Z and loving the Evo. It ended up being completely the other way around. A few weeks later I test drove a 2011 Nismo and that sealed the deal. Now I have a Nismo on order. ![]() Last edited by Naenyn; 09-27-2012 at 12:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: California
Posts: 332
Drives: A red Z
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,430
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Any differences on the '13 EVO? I went last month to a Mitsu dealer and all they had were rows of 2012's.
__________________
2012 PW NISMO #0559 - GT Spec Brace Kit - Swift Springs - ARK TP & Invidia CBE K&N Intake - UpRev Tune - 15mm Z1 Spacers & Studs - StopTech Slotted Rotors & SS Lines - ZSpeed CMAK with Stage 2 Clutch and Lightweight Flywheel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 212
Drives: '13 Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I even liked the STIs I drove better than the Evo. Was kinda surprised by that. It's all personal preference, though... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Going straight to the Evo test. Luckily my salesguy was a ricer and evo owner... Knowing that i was coming from an 09 Z he let me beat one up. I was blown away by the Evo's ability. I was exiting a tight highway doughnut exit @ 84mph. At best in the Z, I can pull that donut in the low 60mph range. Doing that donut in a Z at that speed i'm in full drift. In the Evo, the car is still roadholding... the dual clutch in the EVO was AMAZING. The shifts were so fast and perfect, powerful and aggressive, it outperformed the DCT in the 135i by a landslide. The 135i offered more power to boot, though more seamless and less aggressive than the Evo while feeling a little bit more powerful than the Z. The sound of the BOV's on the stock engine was amazing. Steering feedback was spot on, nice and firm but the edge on the Z. The Evo X is slightly louder than the Z but it's more exhaust and turbo noise and less engine noise, vs the Z is engine first, then exhaust. Crappy exhaust @ that. My only issue is on the straight, after about 115'ish miles per hour, The power began dropping off like mad. As with the Z, power doesnt drop off till 140ish mph. Give or take 5mph an hour depending on different variables. My issues with the Evo weren't performance issues at all. Seriously, How often do most of you guys go past 115??? The interior and dash looks chintzy. there was slight interior rattle on bumps which was a unsurprising disappointment considering its a lancer... The seats are comfortable and excellent had positioning but feel forced as far as outward visibility. It's like those seats were too low and the whole car itself was too high. The seat should have been positioned about .25inches higher and the car 1.25" lower. The forward dash was too econoboxish and the materials too $10k'ish for a $44k car. The evo is the budget supercar and the Z is the budget sports car. The Z looks like a budget supercar and the evo looks like a budget sports car. Between the too as far as looks go... The evo is way more displaced by appearance. This all being my subjective opinion. Performance wise... I can't see how one could walk away disapponted from either one but... To each his own. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 212
Drives: '13 Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
Maybe my expectations were too high going in to the test drive .. or I was already subconsciously hooked on the Z .. I don't know. I definitely went in to the Z test drive with very low expectations. It really surprised me. I just didn't enjoy the Evo test drive as much, though. However, I didn't push it as much as you did, either. Maybe if I had played with it a bit more...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|