Originally Posted by TerribleONE 22s are like the new 19s. go big or go home.. 24's or you might as well be rolling on 16s
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-27-2012, 01:14 PM | #62 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
Quote:
Why does the Z need to be as fast as a mustang? i say make it a permanently low volume car in the USA. 3k units a year including nismo models and sport pkg. let us bid for a Z. American market doesnt deserve the next gen Z or the GT-R. Everyone buy a mustang if they care that much about straight line... let europe and asia keep enjoying what we cant understand in america. I totally understand now why it took 30 years for nissan to bring the skyline this way. Most just don't get it. |
|
07-27-2012, 01:44 PM | #63 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cleveland, OH
Age: 69
Posts: 1,830
Drives: 2010 (40th) #706
Rep Power: 16886 |
Quote:
I agree 100%. If you want a car with a V8, RWD and just like every other "chach" car out there, get a Mustang, Corvette or Challenger. If you want something that is faster than 95% of the vehicles on the road, and a truely unique car, get a Z! If you want a Z that is as fast as the cars listed, then you are only a few mods away.
__________________
mults 40th Anniversary 'Z', 312.06HP/260.58TQ (Dynosty EcuTek Tune) Build Date/Number: 1/27/2010 #706 Berk HFC + CBE, R2C CAI, Clear Bra, Cleveland Z Club |
|
07-27-2012, 02:15 PM | #64 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
Quote:
|
|
07-27-2012, 02:50 PM | #65 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 40,963
Drives: HypeTrain Choo Choo!
Rep Power: 141 |
I'm a firm believer in "competition breeds innovation", especially for the automotive industry. Why wouldn't you want the Z to match or best the performance of the Mustang? Staying competitive with its competitors is the only way the Z will survive and live to get better. You're missing the fact that the Mustang is not only faster than the Z in a straight line, but also around a track.
Nissan should be setting their aims high rather than low. Why go after the V6 when you have the capability to take down the bigger and badder V8 mustang/camaro/etc. That's what it did with the GT-R and it has earned so much recognition because of it. They could have easily had it best the BMW and Mercedes in it's price range, but instead they went after more exotic supercars that cost like 5 times as much. |
07-27-2012, 03:02 PM | #66 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
Quote:
MUSTANG GT=V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V8V 8V8 INNOVATION???????? If nissan chooses to FI and reduce weight on the Z to be faster than a stang... Awesome. but dont forget what the Z is. And the Z is not and never was or should be a v8 or 4cyl. Selling it out with a 5.6 to appease some domestic muscle-jocker is out of the question to ANY TRUE Z ENTHUSIAST. REMEMBER THE GTR COST 106K NICELY EQUIPPED AND THE MUSTANG AT ITS HIGHEST IS 70K. gtr point not taken Actually the shelby starts at $54,900 The nissan gt-r starts at $96,820 HUGE DIFFERENCE Last edited by UNKNOWN_370; 07-27-2012 at 05:53 PM. |
|
07-27-2012, 03:10 PM | #67 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 21 |
Quote:
|
|
07-27-2012, 03:13 PM | #68 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 230
Drives: 09 370z red m6
Rep Power: 15 |
Cars like the 370z are nearly extinct in today's car market. There's practically no sports cars in its price range that actually compete with it. The closest competitors to it are the Boxster ($48k+ MSRP), Cayman ($51k+), BMW Z4 ($48k+). The Z starts about $10k less (of course you can option it much higher) and can offer similar (or better) performance to these other cars.
The closest things on the cheaper end of the scale consist of the Subaru BRZ/Scion FS-R, Miata, etc. The STi and EvoX could potentially belong here for sake of those car's performance, but they do not fit the "sports car" bill, sorry Suby and Mitsu fans! The problem is those little cars simply cannot keep up performance wise when you compare them to the 370z. The Z is in sort of this middle ground where it's powered by a (relatively) large displacement NA 6 cylinder. It doesn't have any sort of F.I., meaning that it has less tuning potential at the same price point (i.e. $3k into a FI car gets you much further than $3k into an NA car). So it's not sporting a smaller size 6 cylinder with FI nor is it powered by an NA v8 (like the Mustang GT or Camaro SS, which are similar in price). So what you end up with is this sort of unique car that doesn't seem to fit into any other categories, isn't seen often on the road, and offers true sports car feeling and performance all in "fairly" entry level price point. I kind of enjoy this notion of minor exclusivity at a fairly cheap price. I hope I'm not taking this too far, but you're almost "pigeonholed" into the 370z if you're looking for a sports car that makes around 350hp. So now I'm coming to the real meat of my post; I apologize for the massive introduction. There is no real DIRECT competition for the 370z, that's why you see it getting roped into comparisons with the Mustang GT, Camaro SS, and Challenger SRT8 (i.e. the muscle car crowd). The Z's legacy lies in 6 cylinder engines, but times have changed. Honestly, I enjoy seeing the return of muscle, I'm a huge muscle car fan and I love the idea of bang for your buck, that's the heritage of muscle cars. My idea is that Nissan should use that "miniature Z" platform to produce a new model that hails back to the 240sx. Make it into a small "sporty" car with a turbo 4 cylinder, back seats, and rivals the performance of the Scion FR-S/Subaru BRZ (give it a bit more power, it's great to create more competition). Meanwhile, take the 370z into the v8 direction. Develop a version of one of their existing v8's, call it a VK56VHR (I'm not too good with naming schemes) and make it a higher-revving performance oriented version of the existing 5.6L. So now they offer a turbo 4 cylinder sporty car that could hint at the later year 240sx (97-98, or "kouki") styling. The G37 is still available if you want a sporty 3.7L NA v6. Even the sedan's that Nissan offers can still be "peppy" with the 3.5L v6. Lastly, the Z is now a v8 powered sports car that doesn't take the back seat to the muscle cars, while still managing to produce that euphoric feeling of driving a sports car! Of course all of this is just pure speculation and sort of a pipe dream of mine...
__________________
Good drivers just drive. |
07-27-2012, 03:28 PM | #69 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
In other words... it took way more money to make a GT-R faster than a mustang shelby.
the culture of the mustang is a V8 standard vehicle built up to sports car status and succeeded incredibly. The Z was built as a sports car from the ground up with different characteristics that set it apart from standard cars in its character, performance and behavior. The Z is not designed to be in NASCAR. that's why there's is no NASCAR Z. This is amazing. you guys want the Z to be everything for under $50k. Handle like the cayman. beat the mustang and have the interior quality of BMW. I think you guys should be looking at ferrari and not Z. Unless you want the Z to cost more than the GT-R. its not feasible at sub 50k with everything the Z offers. AND THIS IS NOT OUR DOMESTIC. It's JAPAN'S interpretation of a sports car. Do you go to a french restaurant and tell them I want the frog legs but with gator meat? While going faster and innovation is somethiong we all want. Lets keep it in perspective to Japans vision of the Z. I personally dont need a mustang transplant in the Z. That's why ford throws R&D money on the stang to be what it is... There's other ways for the Z to be fast aside from it copying muscle-car culture... The Z isn't a muscle car. |
07-27-2012, 03:38 PM | #70 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,766
Drives: '15 NISMO 6MT
Rep Power: 117171 |
Quote:
So, while the Mustang does corner well and puts down great track times, no doubt about that, with a similar power to weight ratio the Z is right with it, and IMO in a much more enjoyable-to-drive package. |
|
07-27-2012, 03:38 PM | #71 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 230
Drives: 09 370z red m6
Rep Power: 15 |
I think the problem boils down to the Z getting beat at it's own game. It's not much of a sports car if it loses to muscle cars on the track
__________________
Good drivers just drive. |
07-27-2012, 03:45 PM | #72 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,766
Drives: '15 NISMO 6MT
Rep Power: 117171 |
It is kind of disappointing that the turns vs. straights breakdown doesn't show that the Mustang is losing in the corners and then making up time on the straights due to the HP advantage.
|
07-27-2012, 03:51 PM | #74 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 230
Drives: 09 370z red m6
Rep Power: 15 |
I agree. It kind of is. Even worse when you start to think about the performance of the two vehicles after doing some basic mods. The Mustang GT just keeps getting further and further ahead. The 370z, without any sort of FI or similar displacement in its NA form just loses harder and harder. That is, assuming, both cars spend the exact same amount of $ in mods.
__________________
Good drivers just drive. |
07-27-2012, 03:53 PM | #75 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
Quote:
Or just make the 3.0tt a 375hp car. with the reduced weight in the 2800-2900k lb area for this one. Refining the 3.7 would cost alot more money unless??? they'd been secretly working on it. At least turbos reflect decade one of Z culture. v8's are to heavy and will make for clumsy cornering on a wheelbase shorter than 104 inches. I love the handling too much at 100.4 to lose it. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is the best BBK for my Ford Mustang 5.0? | blue660r01 | Other Vehicles | 13 | 01-30-2012 08:28 PM |
AE Performance Ford GT Done Right! | Casey@AEperformance | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 28 | 06-18-2011 05:21 AM |
1,400 hp Ford GT | Crazy8 | Other Vehicles | 3 | 03-20-2010 04:17 PM |
Ford WTF | bigaudiofanat | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 36 | 11-25-2009 11:28 AM |
Unhappy people watch TV, happy people read/socialize, says study | AK370Z | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 4 | 11-16-2008 06:56 AM |