Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   2015 speculation (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/58224-2015-speculation.html)

Jordo! 07-25-2012 08:23 PM

Lighter with equal or better power to weight and better torque sounds good to me -- especially if accomplished with boost, because then it's waaaay easier to turn up the wick.

FL 4Motion 07-25-2012 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 1837980)
Entire article might as well be someone's post on here....last sentence makes him sound like a troll, lol.

I somewhat disagree, the 370z def has some significant shortcomings right out of the box for a track enthusiast. most of them are an easy fix (minus the fuel starve) but it would have been nice it the car came wiht a real lsd, good brakes, and an oil cooler from the factory (not to mention a second pick up point in the fule tank so sweeping right handers don't kill the car).

enkei2k 07-25-2012 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0rM (Post 1838019)
I tell ya... If the next Z has a 4 cylinder turbo, the 370 will be my last Z car. If I wanted fuel economy, I would have bought a Prius.

Or if you want to stay in the Nissan family, a Leaf, Versa, or Sentra (although the last two aren't as high in MPG as Leaf/Prius)

kenchan 07-25-2012 10:02 PM

sorry to say, but this Justin Cupler (author) just landed himself on my ignore list.

ZMan8 07-25-2012 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 1838371)
sorry to say, but this Justin Cupler (author) just landed himself on my ignore list.

:rofl2:

forza370z 07-26-2012 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddyZ (Post 1837855)
The engine is the one thing that Nakamura pointed to as needing changed, as the 3.7-liter V-6 just isn’t cutting it. Sure, it’s pumping out a healthy 332 ponies, but its 270 pound-feet of torque leave a little to be desired. The 370Z can hit 60 mph in 5.1 seconds on a good day, but modern sports cars are almost all in the sub-5-second range. Moreover, the 18 to 19 mpg city and 25 to 26 mpg highway is really dragging Nissan down in the CAFÉ regulations.

does that mean its going to be faster and better mpg?

:iagree: The 332 hp is ok for now. And just ok. The 276 pound-feet torque is lame. I just read an article on the next gen IPL g coupe. It's gonna be a v6 twin turbo rock 530hp! Since the G and the Z are like cousins, I doubt(also hope!) the next Z is going to be turbo charged!

bigsix 07-26-2012 12:38 AM

It'd be interesting to see if Nissan withholding the Z car from the market for a couple years would then stimulate demand later on . ? . .

Cmike2780 07-26-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FL 4Motion (Post 1838231)
I somewhat disagree, the 370z def has some significant shortcomings right out of the box for a track enthusiast. most of them are an easy fix (minus the fuel starve) but it would have been nice it the car came wiht a real lsd, good brakes, and an oil cooler from the factory (not to mention a second pick up point in the fule tank so sweeping right handers don't kill the car).

It does come with an oil cooler now...and I thought they fixed the brake issues by adding better venting. It would have been nice if they had it all along though.

I know it has it's fair share of shortcomings, but to say "the 370Z was a disappointment to most enthusiasts and it really is a far cry from the Z-cars of yesteryear" is uninformed jiberish. IMO the 370 is better than the 350 in every way, but because the sales figures during one of the worst recession in history doesn't match that of 350, it's a failure. It just sounds like this writer hasn't done any real research within the Z community.....or any group into cars for that matter. The Z was and is marketed towards the average "working man." The 370 just had bad timing, especially when the working man's chances of being unemployed became that much more likely.

|samu 07-26-2012 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmike2780 (Post 1838764)
It does come with an oil cooler now...and I thought they fixed the brake issues by adding better venting. It would have been nice if they had it all along though.

I know it has it's fair share of shortcomings, but to say "the 370Z was a disappointment to most enthusiasts and it really is a far cry from the Z-cars of yesteryear" is uninformed jiberish. IMO the 370 is better than the 350 in every way, but because the sales figures during one of the worst recession in history doesn't match that of 350, it's a failure. It just sounds like this writer hasn't done any real research within the Z community.....or any group into cars for that matter. The Z was and is marketed towards the average "working man." The 370 just had bad timing, especially when the working man's chances of being unemployed became that much more likely.


Preach on brother. Now all we need is a factory turno

onzedge 07-26-2012 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0rM (Post 1838019)
I tell ya... If the next Z has a 4 cylinder turbo, the 370 will be my last Z car. If I wanted fuel economy, I would have bought a Prius.

:tup:

Cmike2780 07-26-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |samu (Post 1838779)
Preach on brother. Now all we need is a factory turno

Who are you? and why are your impersonating Isamu?

edub370 07-26-2012 08:32 AM

now if they go with a turbo inline 6 on the other hand...

:leghump: :drool:

onzedge 07-26-2012 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |samu (Post 1838779)
Preach on brother. Now all we need is a factory turno

Reported to moderators.

|samu 07-26-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onzedge (Post 1838841)
Reported to moderators.

For what?

Cmike2780 07-26-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |samu (Post 1838867)
For what?

read this


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2