![]() |
The Fast and Frugal???
6. Nissan 370Z - Jim Gorzelany - Forbes
Well i guess it's better than making the list of the slow and expensive..... |
Nice find. I would like to think the Z is a tad faster to 60 then 5.2 but I guess thats not bad.
|
yeah if i remember the first 5 cars cost 10 to 15 grand more than the 370.
if there's a better sports car on the road for the 370's price. someone speak up |
Quote:
|
the Z can hit 60 in under 5. i dont know where they get that data
|
Quote:
We have autos, its easier for us to get under 5. The mags test the manual. It seems most of these manual guys concur 5.0 to 5.5. I know in my auto I'm substantially faster than that on a good day. |
Quote:
JK, I really can't think of any more focused sports car, other than perhaps the FR-S, BR-Z duo and "fast" is a debatable adjective for them. The Genesis coupe IS cheaper than the Z, thought I wouldn't pick it over the Z. |
lol, they list the boxster and cayman separately.
|
genesis and Z have the same 0-60 time... Who knew!
:roflpuke2: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I like the Mustang but its a 2+2 like the Hyundai and its still a muscle car lacking an element of refinement I like in a sportscar. Once again please do not flame me for just a simple opinion. Drive what you like and life is good. 370Z- Looks, performance, handling and quality its a good package. Is it perfect? No. NO car is. |
Our 0-60 is 5 seconds? That blows... My buddies FX50S's 0-60 is 5 seconds, and usually a bit quicker, and that weights 4700 pounds...
My LIGHTY modified 2009 Maxima's 0-60 was 5.7 seconds... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess that makes the Z an under-achiever sports car.:icon18: |
is this a flash intensive site (the linky) or something? it's taking forever to load.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2