![]() |
Quote:
|
All i gotta say is, if you are downgrading from a 100k car to a 30k car to me its more of a money issue.
If you can afford a GTR, like ACTUALLY AFFORD ONE, you can buy a Z too if you really wanted to. If i can afford a GTR, i would never back track to a Z, regardless of Manual or not. *I'd buy both* |
I own a 2010 stock super silver GTR it doesn't feel like a real sports car so I bought another car a 2012 370z sport touring model it currently has 600 rwhp and it feels way more sporty...
|
Quote:
/thread. |
Quote:
Buy a 370z and build it up to 600whp then you will have what you want :bowrofl: :tiphat: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is such a strong feeling I will try and describe what I hear every time this is mentioned. I am not accusing anyone of anything, I just want it put into perspective. "Hey in prison you have men that want sex all day long with you. Soon you won't miss a vagina." YES I WILL! To each his own. If Michael Schumaker drives me around the track I will go faster still. The point is, I am driving, not a car that thinks it knows what I want. GTR's have had poor sales in a bad economy true. Perhaps they would have sold more had they come with a clutch. One more for sure. |
Quote:
|
I kind of agree. GT-R with a 6-speed and Syncro-Rev would be awesome.
|
I make $175k and I was comfortably affording both my GT-R and my 2011 Nissan Maxima. I sold the car because of the reasons I stated in this thread and my original thread. I've always had two cars; one for daily driving and a sports car. Before the GT-R, I had a 2011 E92 M3 Coupe and I sold that because my girlfriend told me we were expecting (my first child).
A few months after my daughter arrived, I started getting the itch again and placed an order for a 2012 E92 M3 Coupe. While waiting for my M3 to be built, I decided that I wanted to try a GT-R, so I cancelled my order and bought a GT-R. After owning (3) M3's before the GT-R, I simply felt that the GT-R was too perfect, too much power for public roads, and not having a manual just made the overall experience less than stimulating. My reasons for wanting a Nismo Z has nothing to do with finances. I could easily afford a brand new M3 Coupe or any other car in the $75-100k range. However, the only car that peaks my interest, at this point, is the Nismo Z. I was actually going to get the new M5 but after reading that it drives like a luxury car but fast like a super sedan, I was completely turned off. BMW seems to be going 'soft' with the next generation of vehicles. Hopefully, the next M3 stays true to the ///M division's heritage. Personally, unless you actually have the time to go to the track on a regular basis, which I don't, why own both a GT-R and a Z? You could just daily drive your Z and tune it to your liking. There are a lot of people that make VERY good money and don't drive $100k plus cars. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Manual cars are fun ALL the time, except when you're in traffic but its really not that difficult and no one is having fun in traffic. The GT-R is great but its not a Driver's Car. Subjectively, I think the GT-R looks like crap, on a weekly basis at our local Glen Clove meet you have your Ferraris, Lambos, and a Lotus and then you typically have 2-4 GT-Rs. Guess what, when it comes to looks the crowd doesn't look twice at the GT-R's. So you pay a premium to be the Exotics' Faster Ugly Step Sister, sorry man doesn't work for me. |
Quote:
|
Bottom line is they couldn't afford the payments/gas/insurance on a GT-R in the first place and probably had no business buying one. Claiming they are a purist and need a manual Z is probably only face saving IMO.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2