Have you owned a car faster than a 370Z ?

cave vulture · 06-12-2009, 01:56 PM

At one time I had a 1965 Griffith., which weighed less than 2000 lbs., powered by a Ford 289, 275 h.p. V8, and could do 0-60 in under 5 seconds. Not bad for 1965 ?

Modshack · 06-12-2009, 02:01 PM

Just got rid of this...470hp, 3200 lbs. I actuallly like the Z better...it's not all about horsepower!...

leepeen · 06-12-2009, 02:08 PM

Is stock EVO9 quicker than stock 370z?
I used to drive EVO9(friend's car) for a week, i think EVO9 was much faster than 370z.

IMWEZL · 06-12-2009, 02:51 PM

Here was my little beast; I put down 360whp/360wtq on 93pump, mid 400hp on 106 Octane.

SRT4 Dyno Run @ NOPI STL Video by Jay-G - MySpace Video

gnarf · 06-12-2009, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leepeen

Is stock EVO9 quicker than stock 370z?
I used to drive EVO9(friend's car) for a week, i think EVO9 was much faster than 370z.

yea but Evo9's pretty much drive for you with all their computers AYC, AWC, ABCDEFG and some other acronyms...manuals transmissions almost always seem faster as well...since you have the A7...i drove a friends stock evo..didnt feel very fast until higher revs...its pretty quick

shabarivas · 06-12-2009, 02:59 PM

Stock Evos only feel fast cus of boost... my Z is just about as fast as my X was stock... but w/ mods ... forget about it

Mike · 06-12-2009, 03:19 PM

Had a
91 300ZX TT modified to approx 400 bhp
Stillen Stage 3 2003 350Z with 330rwhp

Still have a 2005 C6 Vette, it was supercharged with 515 rwhp, but ran too hot on track so it is NA now, and only 390 rwhp. Was going to do a stroker engine, but bought the 370 instead, and will just keep the C6 as is.

Sashimi · 06-12-2009, 03:23 PM

Too bad I couldn't get it to run right

EDIT: also can't get the link to run right either, one sec

Sashimi · 06-12-2009, 03:27 PM

Lug · 06-12-2009, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cave vulture

At one time I had a 1965 Griffith., which weighed less than 2000 lbs., powered by a Ford 289, 275 h.p. V8, and could do 0-60 in under 5 seconds. Not bad for 1965 ?

Holy cow, You are the only person I've ever heard from that owned one. I've one seen one at a car show once. The ultimate more power/less weight car of the era!

VCuomo · 06-12-2009, 04:16 PM

Here's another one of my toys (still own it):

shabarivas · 06-12-2009, 05:18 PM

clean vette man!

IDZRVIT · 06-12-2009, 05:43 PM

How about a bike?

import111 · 06-12-2009, 05:47 PM

My last car was an 05 STi with 275whp and 308wtrq. It was faster in a straight line. I think with HFC's and catback the Z will be almost as fast as the STi was in a straight line, and might be faster around a road course.

webgirl · 06-12-2009, 06:11 PM

I haven't really researched my numbers and i'm not sure what the setting is in which we are comparing but I've owned a Lotus Elise and a Z4 M Roadster in the last year. (Yes, it's been a good year.) I feel like the M was a little faster, definitely more torque. I know the first time I put it in sport mode and really got on it, I realized that I had never driven anything that fast in my life.

Ok, I had to see the numbers, 370z 0-60 in 4.7, Z4 M 0-60 in 4.8, & Elise 0-60 in 4.9. So they're all within a tenth of a second of each other. I guess the answer to the question is no, but I will say that out of all of them the Lotus was the "easiest" as far as shifting and the whole driver factor is concerned so if I were putting my cars against each other the list would probably go Elise, 370z, M Roady.

06-12-2009, 01:56 PM	#1 (permalink)
cave vulture Enthusiast Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: pennsylvania Posts: 427 Drives: 370z tour,sport,auto Rep Power: 16	Have you owned a car faster than a 370Z ? At one time I had a 1965 Griffith., which weighed less than 2000 lbs., powered by a Ford 289, 275 h.p. V8, and could do 0-60 in under 5 seconds. Not bad for 1965 ?

06-12-2009, 02:01 PM	#2 (permalink)
Modshack A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Greenville NC Posts: 2,883 Drives: 370Z Sport Rep Power: 976	Just got rid of this...470hp, 3200 lbs. I actuallly like the Z better...it's not all about horsepower!... __________________ Steal my car! (SOLD)...Now Porsche Cayman S Oil Cooler DIY: Here!

06-12-2009, 02:51 PM	#4 (permalink)
IMWEZL Track Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: HNL Posts: 603 Drives: 370Z/MKVII GTI Rep Power: 17	Here was my little beast; I put down 360whp/360wtq on 93pump, mid 400hp on 106 Octane. SRT4 Dyno Run @ NOPI STL Video by Jay-G - MySpace Video Last edited by IMWEZL; 06-12-2009 at 03:01 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What cars have you owned??	frcefed	Other Vehicles	272	01-05-2013 10:33 AM
Faster with VCD off?	msl82	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	63	10-09-2011 12:58 PM
370z owned by Cobalt SS turbo :-(	leepeen	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	14	05-31-2009 05:02 PM
which one is faster?	leepeen	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	7	05-26-2009 04:00 AM
what is faster ?!: 135i vs 370z (stock)	daniil.berman	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	25	05-14-2009 10:41 PM

06-12-2009, 02:08 PM	#3 (permalink)
leepeen Base Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Vancouver Posts: 110 Drives: PW 370z Touring A7 Rep Power: 16	Is stock EVO9 quicker than stock 370z? I used to drive EVO9(friend's car) for a week, i think EVO9 was much faster than 370z.

06-12-2009, 02:59 PM	#6 (permalink)
shabarivas A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sacramento, CA Posts: 2,188 Drives: 370z MB 6mt Rep Power: 914	Stock Evos only feel fast cus of boost... my Z is just about as fast as my X was stock... but w/ mods ... forget about it

06-12-2009, 03:19 PM	#7 (permalink)
Mike The370Z.com Sponsor Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Loganville, GA Posts: 5,944 Drives: 370z Rep Power: 2186	Had a 91 300ZX TT modified to approx 400 bhp Stillen Stage 3 2003 350Z with 330rwhp Still have a 2005 C6 Vette, it was supercharged with 515 rwhp, but ran too hot on track so it is NA now, and only 390 rwhp. Was going to do a stroker engine, but bought the 370 instead, and will just keep the C6 as is.

06-12-2009, 03:23 PM	#8 (permalink)
Sashimi Base Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Pleasanton, CA Posts: 120 Drives: Pearl White 370z Rep Power: 401	Too bad I couldn't get it to run right EDIT: also can't get the link to run right either, one sec

06-12-2009, 03:27 PM	#9 (permalink)
Sashimi Base Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Pleasanton, CA Posts: 120 Drives: Pearl White 370z Rep Power: 401

06-12-2009, 04:16 PM	#11 (permalink)
VCuomo Track Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: SoCal Posts: 887 Drives: BMW 335i Sport Rep Power: 17	Here's another one of my toys (still own it):

06-12-2009, 05:18 PM	#12 (permalink)
shabarivas A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sacramento, CA Posts: 2,188 Drives: 370z MB 6mt Rep Power: 914	clean vette man!

06-12-2009, 05:47 PM	#14 (permalink)
import111 Track Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ. Posts: 622 Drives: 09 Nissan 370Z Rep Power: 191	My last car was an 05 STi with 275whp and 308wtrq. It was faster in a straight line. I think with HFC's and catback the Z will be almost as fast as the STi was in a straight line, and might be faster around a road course.

06-12-2009, 06:11 PM	#15 (permalink)
webgirl Base Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 55 Drives: 09 Nissan 370z MB M6 Rep Power: 16	I haven't really researched my numbers and i'm not sure what the setting is in which we are comparing but I've owned a Lotus Elise and a Z4 M Roadster in the last year. (Yes, it's been a good year.) I feel like the M was a little faster, definitely more torque. I know the first time I put it in sport mode and really got on it, I realized that I had never driven anything that fast in my life. Ok, I had to see the numbers, 370z 0-60 in 4.7, Z4 M 0-60 in 4.8, & Elise 0-60 in 4.9. So they're all within a tenth of a second of each other. I guess the answer to the question is no, but I will say that out of all of them the Lotus was the "easiest" as far as shifting and the whole driver factor is concerned so if I were putting my cars against each other the list would probably go Elise, 370z, M Roady.