![]() |
Quote:
|
i think the main selling point and reason for BRZ/FRS is suppose to be price and power/weight ratio. bascially taking nothing and trying to make something out of it.
when you add all sorts of aftermarket parts to make these cars 'capable' as in enough power to compete with the current standard 300hp+ sports car crowd, the prices go up into Z terriory. why not then just buy the real deal in that case instead of tinkering around with some wannabie toy? that is how i see this car. if 200hp and lightweight/fun to drive/cheap, then it needs to sell under $25K. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am wondering, if Toyota/Subaru want to make a sports couple, why couldn't they do it 'properly', I mean at least with more horses that can compete with the V6 coupes out there, since there is not too many choices in that category. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Subaru has already confirmed there is a Turbo FA20 motor and it is NOT going in the 86 right now:
Next-Gen Subaru WRX to Get Turbo 2.0-Liter Targeting 270 hp - WOT on Motor Trend |
Quote:
The subaru BRZ is at 2700 approx lbs. Which probably puts the Z and turbo brz in the same hp to weight ratio. Not to mention FI is a much more valid modifier. I mean I'm not even going to pass any judgement till the turbo is on a track and competing. The BRZ seems like a pretty good pkg for what it is. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
the STI monicker isn't being used for the BRZ, it was used for the STI BRZ CONCEPT (the blue one with the wing, more aggresive body kit, wheels, etc). The concept was supposed to draw attention to what could be, not necessarily what will be. So in that regard I don't think Subaru is doing anything wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2