![]() |
Originally Posted by Zemurray My 94 z28 felt better than the 98 SS, so I'm with you on that. When I first got the 370 I told my wife that
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7627 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Problem is, I can only floor it for a few seconds before I'm doing double the limit on any freeway in my area. Then I stop flooring it and just cruise around, and for that, it flat-out sucks. Interior is very Cobalt. Except the Cobalt's sound-system is better. I looked up C&D's numbers, and the C5 'vette and the 370Z are identical within the variance of car-to-car in EVERY acceleration aspect I could find. For whatever ricer-math it's worth, I never lost to a C5, or a 2010 SS in my bone-stock 6-speed WS6 (2001). I am expecting similar to the 370Z, and they felt the same to me. A lot of people say once the C5/F-body hits 3rd gear, it's over, but looking at the 370Z's dyno-charts, I don't see why. It pulls hard right up to red-line, and has a table-flat torque curve and very well-matched gearing. |
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|