Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   Staggered or square setup? (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/39270-staggered-square-setup.html)

sojirovskensi 07-08-2011 09:38 AM

Staggered or square setup?
 
I know some members go to track often. I am about to buy a new set of rims, and just wondering how many of people prefer staggered over square setup.

TypeOne 07-08-2011 11:38 AM

I would like to run a square setup as I do on all of my other cars, but the sizes just aren't flattering in the front or the rear on the Z. At least, in my opinion.

I run staggered, mainly because wheels fit the car much better this way.

I know Mike and a few other guys run the square setups though, so maybe they would share some insight.

Econ 07-08-2011 11:39 AM

i like staggered for the simple fact that it looks much more aggressive.

m4a1mustang 07-08-2011 11:45 AM

I prefer a square setup for handling, although some cars benefit from a staggered setup (think Porsche 911s which need stagger to help control oversteer).

I feel like the Z has a lot of factory understeer, so I'd definitely avoid increasing the stagger if you choose to stay with a staggered setup.

ChrisSlicks 07-08-2011 11:48 AM

He's talking about track wheels here, looks are secondary.

Square has the advantage that it is easier to rotate the car and easy to rotate the tires for equalizing wear. You are giving up a small amount of grip potential to make this compromise but your tires will last a heck of a lot longer. I would probably go with a +30 offset 10" or 10.5" rim.

I have a 30mm stagger on both my track wheels and the street wheels and I have no issue rotating the car the way it is setup currently even with slicks. Some of this is driving style and some of it is suspension setup.

djpathfinder 07-08-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1209161)
I prefer a square setup for handling, although some cars benefit from a staggered setup (think Porsche 911s which need stagger to help control oversteer).

I feel like the Z has a lot of factory understeer, so I'd definitely avoid increasing the stagger if you choose to stay with a staggered setup.

Increase negative camber in the front to -1.6 to -2.5. That will eliminate understeer with our staggered setup. That of course means you need to get a SPC front camber kit to be able to make those adjustments.

m4a1mustang 07-08-2011 11:56 AM

Yeah, there are a lot of ways to do it. I felt like it's more a combination of the stagger and soft bars, though.

ChrisSlicks 07-08-2011 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djpathfinder (Post 1209175)
Increase negative camber in the front to -1.6 to -2.5. That will eliminate understeer with our staggered setup. That of course means you need to get a SPC front camber kit to be able to make those adjustments.

Yep, this is a must. I run about -3.5 in the front, -2.0 rear. I would actually like -1.8 in the rear but I'm maxed out with the current adjusters.

m4a1mustang 07-08-2011 11:58 AM

You don't DD your car, do you Chris?

ChrisSlicks 07-08-2011 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1209181)
You don't DD your car, do you Chris?

Not really. My commute is 3 miles at 35 mph, and half the time I take the truck :) Yes, all that front camber would kill tires if you do a lot of DD miles, but toe is the real killer. I run zero front toe.

m4a1mustang 07-08-2011 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks (Post 1209182)
Not really. My commute is 3 miles at 35 mph, and half the time I take the truck :) Yes, all that front camber would kill tires if you do a lot of DD miles, but toe is the real killer. I run zero front toe.

Gotcha. I'm not a big fan of lots of camber on a street setup, and definitely zero toe.

Red__Zed 07-08-2011 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks (Post 1209182)
Not really. My commute is 3 miles at 35 mph, and half the time I take the truck :) Yes, all that front camber would kill tires if you do a lot of DD miles, but toe is the real killer. I run zero front toe.

How is zero toe gonna kill your tires?

m4a1mustang 07-08-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1209198)
How is zero toe gonna kill your tires?

He didn't say it would. He said the -3.5* of camber would wear the inside of the tires out quickly, but added that toe is the real tire killer. Because of this he does not run any toe. :tup:

ChrisSlicks 07-08-2011 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1209198)
How is zero toe gonna kill your tires?

No zero toe saves your tires. Too much toe was what I was talking about, some people (especially auto-x folk) run aggressive toe to improve steering response and initial turn-in. Even with zero toe my car turns in like a beast, I've let quite a few people drive it and they all make the same comment. Even with all the camber I still tend to kill the outside edge of the tire long before the rest is worn out.

ChrisSlicks 07-08-2011 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1209202)
He didn't say it would. He said the -3.5* of camber would wear the inside of the tires out quickly, but added that toe is the real tire killer. Because of this he does not run any toe. :tup:

:tup:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2