|
The numbers seem a bit optimistic. That puts it faster than a C5 vette (that's 100 lbs lighter, lots more torque, and 18 hp more) Didn't we had another article
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-25-2009, 12:54 AM
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 20   |
The numbers seem a bit optimistic. That puts it faster than a C5 vette (that's 100 lbs lighter, lots more torque, and 18 hp more) Didn't we had another article that had the auto at .2 sec slower than the manual?
 edit: just noticed it doesn't have the sports package so is a bit lighter and maybe has less rolling resistance from the tires?
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs Last edited by Lug; 04-25-2009 at 01:06 AM. |
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MotorTrend First Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z test drive 4.7 sec 0 to 60 11.25.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 47 | 11-11-2009 08:06 PM |
| MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | dlmartin81 | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 10 | 03-16-2009 12:59 AM |
| 2009 Nissan 370Z - "NEW" Road Test By Car and Drive 02.04.09 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 6 | 02-05-2009 08:06 PM |
| ROAD & TRACK Video - Full Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | sbsmoov | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 12-01-2008 11:05 PM |
| Great C&D article... 2009 Nissan 370Z - Road Test | ctzn | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 21 | 12-01-2008 04:34 PM |
Threaded Mode
