Nissan 370Z Forum  

2009 Nissan 370Z Automatic - Short Take Road Test

Originally Posted by wellarmed 0 TO 60 times are very subjective. Exactly how is that being measured right down to the .00 mph and .00 sec? The speedo? G-meter? GPS?

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > Nissan 370Z General Discussions


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2009, 12:51 PM   #31 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 19
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wellarmed View Post
0 TO 60 times are very subjective. Exactly how is that being measured right down to the .00 mph and .00 sec? The speedo? G-meter? GPS? Radar?
Personally... I don't believe any of these 0-60 times as being absolutely accurate.

The quarter mile oth..... If this test was done on a drag strip with NHRA sanctioned equipment, you can't just go saying "that's not right". The timing equipment on a legit track doesn't lie.
In this case the mph and et are right in line with each other so if this test was done on a legit dragstrip then it did it. Unless you think the testers are lieing.

One last thing.... this auto isn't a slushbox. A point that I think will be painfully proven to some who don't have one as time goes by.
As I said, I'm getting the auto. It's not a dual cluch which means it is a slushbox, abet a great one. You just can't alter physics because we wish we could. Show me one other car where a traditional auto takes the manual and I'll become a believer. These numbers say this car will beat a 350 hp vette that is lighter and has a LOT more torque, manual OR auto. Plus, no one else has been able to get this autop to run faster than the manual. It's a case of ignoring all the data but the data you like, sorry.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs
Lug is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 01:00 PM   #32 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
miguez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 359
Drives: '04 Cavalier
Rep Power: 181
miguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Not trying to add fuel to the fire, but the opposite, to clarify a bit. Test numbers have to be taken for what they are, which means in what conditions they were performed. Of course Car & Driver and Motortrend know what they are doing, but they certainly test differently than Edmunds, who obtained a 5.3 (5.8 with traction control enabled) seconds time from 0 - 60 mph with a Touring 6MT. Why the difference? It's actually a good read:

Edmund's 370Z track test

How Edmunds tests cars

A lot of the difference is to do with the 1-foot rollout (read the second article to understand the details). So without knowing exactly how Car & Driver and Motortrend, or anyone else has tested the car, it's impossible to compare numbers with another test and have reliable results.

By the way, I had no idea about any of this until a couple of days ago, when i saw the Edmunds results and thought "These guys have no idea how to test a car!". I kept reading and finally understood.
miguez is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 01:02 PM   #33 (permalink)
Retired admin
 
frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0
frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost
Default

I actually don't disagree that I can't figure out how it would not just beat, but trounce the C5 vette, which as lug stated, had more hp, more torque, and was lighter.
frost is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 01:16 PM   #34 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 19
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frost View Post
I actually don't disagree that I can't figure out how it would not just beat, but trounce the C5 vette, which as lug stated, had more hp, more torque, and was lighter.
Plus there was an article where they comapred the Auto and the Manual side by side. The numbers in that one were 5.1 for the manual and 5.3 for the auto. It was posted here but I can't find it now. There is variation in every car but at least this test had same time, altitude, temp, humidity etc when comparing the two. I think it may have be done in England but not sure.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs
Lug is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 05:28 PM   #35 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Endgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,613
Drives: Nothing Now!
Rep Power: 223
Endgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond reputeEndgame has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Sigh... G37 7AT IS faster than the G37 6MT. No reason why the Z would be any different. I believe the numbers. That is all.
Endgame is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 05:43 PM   #36 (permalink)
Retired admin
 
frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0
frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost frost
Default

Is the issue that the auto is faster, or that it's that fast?
frost is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 07:40 PM   #37 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
zman1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 361
Drives: 2011 Audi S4
Rep Power: 428
zman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lug View Post
Show me one other car where a traditional auto takes the manual and I'll become a believer.
As someone already stated the G37 has consistently gotten better times with the 7AT. Don't forget the Bmw 335i that C&D reported is faster with the "slushbox". There are plenty of cars out there with the latest auto tranny's that are pulling better numbers than manuals. I'm tempted to think that you just haven't been keeping up. Hell even the IS-F is a traditional slushbox but shifts nearly as quick as dual clutch trannys.
zman1910 is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:37 PM   #38 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 19
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zman1910 View Post
As someone already stated the G37 has consistently gotten better times with the 7AT. Don't forget the Bmw 335i that C&D reported is faster with the "slushbox". There are plenty of cars out there with the latest auto tranny's that are pulling better numbers than manuals. I'm tempted to think that you just haven't been keeping up. Hell even the IS-F is a traditional slushbox but shifts nearly as quick as dual clutch trannys.
BMW 335i Coupe

A coupe version of BMW's best-selling 3-Series, the E92 body style on which the 335i Coupe is based, was released in August 2006.
Fast Facts

1. Class: Mid-size luxury
2. Passengers: 5
3. Engine: Turbocharged 3.0 Liter I-6
4. Transmission: 6-speed manual, 6-speed automatic
5. Fuel Efficiency: 17/26
6. Power: 300 hp @ 5800 RPM
7. Torque: 300 (lb-ft) @ 1400 RPM
8. MSRP: $41,200
9. 0-60: 5.3 seconds (manual), 5.5 seconds (automatic)

BMW 335i Coupe - Mahalo

There was some bruhaha oave an automatic 335i that was overly fast but it turned out to be overboosted by .5 lbs. Don't remember the article. Th test is a lot more valid if they have both cars on the same day. The 370Z changes gears in 500 milliseconds. Not bad at all but a duel clutch can achieve 30 milliseconds or less. The biggest number that jumps out at me on this test is a 13.1 second quarter mile. That smokes a C5 vette, manual OR automatic. Unless Nissan is lieing about their HP numbers (which we know they aren't from dyno readings), they would have to have magic fairy dust to make up for less hp less torque and more weight. As I said earlier, one mag review (which I can't find now) did a back to back test on an auto vs manual and the manual was .2 sec faster. That would tend to agree with how 99% of testing has gone in the past. I see everyone here jumping on this one test and ignoring all others. That's just selective data gathering.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs
Lug is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:44 PM   #39 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
miguez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 359
Drives: '04 Cavalier
Rep Power: 181
miguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond reputemiguez has a reputation beyond repute
Default

This is a pretty interesting discussion. Without saying that one is faster than the other (because I don't know), keep in mind that heavier cars have an advantage on putting power down onto the road by simply having more weight on the tires (that's why Formula 1 cars have downforce, after all). Also, when looking at 1/4 mile times, cars are going fast enough that aerodynamics start to creep into the results.

Just food for thought.
miguez is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:50 PM   #40 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
zman1910's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 361
Drives: 2011 Audi S4
Rep Power: 428
zman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond reputezman1910 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

^You're using BMW's claims for performance. And there was never any bruhahaha as far as I remember unless you are talking about a specific article from some other mag. There is nothing wrong with using BMW's performance claims....just like any other manufacturer they post a slower time for the slushbox. That never stops anyone from proving them wrong though.

There's even talk of the new Camaro being faster with the slushbox....despite the manual having a hp advantage.
zman1910 is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:56 PM   #41 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
LiquidZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,940
Drives: Mag. Black 2009 370Z
Rep Power: 704
LiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond reputeLiquidZ has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Awesome numbers.
__________________
LiquidZ is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:58 PM   #42 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 19
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Here's an article where the 370Z manual is faster than the Auto (but not the one I read before). Seems light on data though.

Nissan 370Z
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs

Last edited by Lug; 04-25-2009 at 11:00 PM.
Lug is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 12:23 AM   #43 (permalink)
Base Member
 
joeyz10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 248
Drives: 09 370z AT/ RRSS 08/
Rep Power: 16
joeyz10 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forumite View Post
This cant be right. Auto's are far inferior to a manual.

/sarcasm off
Those are the good old days man...... we are on the 21st century now
joeyz10 is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 12:36 AM   #44 (permalink)
Base Member
 
joeyz10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 248
Drives: 09 370z AT/ RRSS 08/
Rep Power: 16
joeyz10 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Endgame View Post
Sigh... G37 7AT IS faster than the G37 6MT. No reason why the Z would be any different. I believe the numbers. That is all.
I AGREE !!! Just face the facts No human hand is quicker than this 7 at
joeyz10 is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:10 AM   #45 (permalink)
Lug
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 19
Lug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to beholdLug is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeyz10 View Post
I AGREE !!! Just face the facts No human hand is quicker than this 7 at
The 7AT switches gears in 500 milliseconds. That's very fast for a traditional Auto, but you can switch gears manually quicker. The gear ratios can play a role as well. A dual clutch is truely far faster than anyone can manually switch gears.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs
Lug is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MotorTrend First Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z test drive 4.7 sec 0 to 60 11.25.08 AK370Z Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery 47 11-11-2009 08:06 PM
MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z dlmartin81 Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery 10 03-16-2009 12:59 AM
2009 Nissan 370Z - "NEW" Road Test By Car and Drive 02.04.09 AK370Z Nissan 370Z General Discussions 6 02-05-2009 08:06 PM
ROAD & TRACK Video - Full Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z sbsmoov Nissan 370Z General Discussions 4 12-01-2008 11:05 PM
Great C&D article... 2009 Nissan 370Z - Road Test ctzn Nissan 370Z General Discussions 21 12-01-2008 04:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2