Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   oil cooler (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/35535-oil-cooler.html)

bigZ 04-28-2011 01:22 PM

oil cooler
 
If I do not intend on bringing my 370z to the track should I still invest in an oil cooler?

I intend on buying headers, high flow cats , intake, cat back and a tune for the car over the next year. SHould I budget an oil cooler too?

Dave B

daisuke149 04-28-2011 01:26 PM

some say you dont "need it" but i would recommend it. Its like a computer, the OEM heatsink/fan work but a zalman or something is always recommended. The more you can keep your temps in line, the better it is for durability and long term life.

But if you dont plan on tracking, a 19 or 25 row should be fine. maybe a 25 row with a thermostatic plate since your down in TX.

http://www.the370z.com/drivetrain-en...tomizable.html

Econ 04-28-2011 01:28 PM

If you can afford it, I would.

Especially you being in TX, I hit 230 degrees right now in New York and its only mid 60's.

It's not necessary, however i would do this mod over say headers... just my 2c

onzedge 04-28-2011 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daisuke149 (Post 1078904)
some say you dont "need it" but i would recommend it. Its like a computer, the OEM heatsink/fan work but a zalman or something is always recommended. The more you can keep your temps in line, the better it is for durability and long term life.

But if you dont plan on tracking, a 19 or 25 row should be fine. maybe a 25 row with a thermostatic plate since your down in TX.

http://www.the370z.com/drivetrain-en...tomizable.html

I run a 19 row and I do not track, but I often drive in traffic and heat. The oil cooler keeps the temps hunky-dory. I use this one:

GTM Motorsports*::*ENGINE EXTERNALS*::*GTM HD OIL COOLER FOR VQ

Footloose301 04-28-2011 02:32 PM

I'd love to get one as well. I want to track the car maybe once or twice a year, which is minimal but I live in Southwest FL and I have Stillen G3. I'm thinking a 25 row.....

daisuke149 04-28-2011 02:34 PM

34 rows will fit fine with gen 3's just fyi. im in GA and i have a 34 and it works really well. Probably overkill for the winter even with the thermostatic plate.

Econ 04-28-2011 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Footloose301 (Post 1078993)
I'd love to get one as well. I want to track the car maybe once or twice a year, which is minimal but I live in Southwest FL and I have Stillen G3. I'm thinking a 25 row.....

should be more than enough. I'm looking into the 19 row, i don't plan on ever tracking, and the majority of the year is pretty cold here in ny however from may-september can get pretty hot and I've already had my oil temp at ~230 and it's not even june yet...

jaedub 04-28-2011 02:50 PM

I live in California where weather hits 100+ and let me tell you........YOU DONT NEED OIL COOLER. Im always at 18-19 with AC blasting (AC causes engine to heat up even more FYI) at 90 degree weather.

HOWEVER........many 370z owners downshift and/or shift at a high RPM hiting 4-5k almost every shift ( I dont know why but its gonna kill the engine). If you're planning on shifting under 4k and not downshift, I can guarantee you YOU DO NOT NEED OIL COOLER.

If you're one of those obnoxious driver (always having your engine in high RPM, downshifting for no reason), then get the oil cooler

And of course install a oil cooler if you're gonna plan on tracking your car.

daisuke149 04-28-2011 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaedub (Post 1079029)
I live in California where weather hits 100+ and let me tell you........YOU DONT NEED OIL COOLER. Im always at 18-19 with AC blasting (AC causes engine to heat up even more FYI) at 90 degree weather.

HOWEVER........many 370z owners downshift and/or shift at a high RPM hiting 4-5k almost every shift ( I dont know why but its gonna kill the engine). If you're planning on shifting under 4k and not downshift, I can guarantee you YOU DO NOT NEED OIL COOLER.

If you're one of those obnoxious driver (always having your engine in high RPM, downshifting for no reason), then get the oil cooler

And of course install a oil cooler if you're gonna plan on tracking your car.

well, if you ask around, i shift normally 3k and despite that, cruising on the highway at a steady speed my oil temps had hit 230 since then i got an oil cooler.

if yours doesnt have issues congrats. but there are many many many many who had the temps go up kinda high (not 280) just driving around and im sure that were all not "obnoxious" drivers.

bigZ 04-28-2011 03:00 PM

A little pricey but I also see it's worth. The 370z is a quick car that shouldnt be granny shifted.

How much for install? Ballpark?

6MT 04-28-2011 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigZ (Post 1078898)
If I do not intend on bringing my 370z to the track should I still invest in an oil cooler?

I intend on buying headers, high flow cats , intake, cat back and a tune for the car over the next year. SHould I budget an oil cooler too?

Dave B

I really don't think it's necessary. If you drive "sanely". I've driven mine pretty hard in 95 degree weather in city traffic with no issues (ever).

But, to each their own.

tonythetiger 04-28-2011 08:49 PM

why couldnt nissan add oil cooler from factory....

Econ 04-28-2011 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonythetiger (Post 1079574)
why couldnt nissan add oil cooler from factory....

because it would have brought the cost of the car over a lot of ppl's price range..

And it just wasnt worth loosing customers over it. 98% of Z owners will never need one anyway

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigZ (Post 1078898)
If I do not intend on bringing my 370z to the track should I still invest in an oil cooler?

I intend on buying headers, high flow cats , intake, cat back and a tune for the car over the next year. SHould I budget an oil cooler too?

Dave B

No, you shouldn't.

GM used to put a plate/fin style oil cooler in the Z06. They no-longer do. The ZR1 doesn't have one, either.

Oil coolers cause problems on the street. Now GM has an oil-cooler that uses the coolant to regulate oil temp. It lives by the oil-pan and has no fins, etc. It simply moves the coolant and oil near each other to keep them roughly the same temp.

A lot of Z06 owners from previous years are only hitting 135-155* on the highway oil-temp. My car runs 185-200* on the highway, depending on ambient temp.

So MUCH BETTER for the car.

I would suggest you take a note from GM who REMOVED an oil-cooler like the one you want to install and developed a different one that won't cause as much issue.

Dark Sarcasm 04-28-2011 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079615)
No, you shouldn't.

GM used to put a plate/fin style oil cooler in the Z06. They no-longer do. The ZR1 doesn't have one, either.

Oil coolers cause problems on the street. Now GM has an oil-cooler that uses the coolant to regulate oil temp. It lives by the oil-pan and has no fins, etc. It simply moves the coolant and oil near each other to keep them roughly the same temp.

A lot of Z06 owners from previous years are only hitting 135-155* on the highway oil-temp. My car runs 185-200* on the highway, depending on ambient temp.

So MUCH BETTER for the car.

I would suggest you take a note from GM who REMOVED an oil-cooler like the one you want to install and developed a different one that won't cause as much issue.

your like a baseball fan in the upper deck doing "the wave". No matter how hard you try you will never be a part of the crowd.

WTF do aftermarket 370Z oil coolers have to do with factory GM oil pan fins coolant thing-a-ma-jigs?

MY 370Z runs in the 200+ temps on 90* days. 220* is not uncommon under hard driving conditions. To the OP, a properly installed oil cooler is no more detrimental to your ride than any other aftermarket part. I would rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaedub (Post 1079029)
I live in California where weather hits 100+ and let me tell you........YOU DONT NEED OIL COOLER. Im always at 18-19 with AC blasting (AC causes engine to heat up even more FYI) at 90 degree weather.

HOWEVER........many 370z owners downshift and/or shift at a high RPM hiting 4-5k almost every shift ( I dont know why but its gonna kill the engine). If you're planning on shifting under 4k and not downshift, I can guarantee you YOU DO NOT NEED OIL COOLER.

If you're one of those obnoxious driver (always having your engine in high RPM, downshifting for no reason), then get the oil cooler

And of course install a oil cooler if you're gonna plan on tracking your car.

believe it or not, for whatever reason driving with the AC on causes the oil temps to go down.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079615)
I would suggest you take a note from GM who REMOVED an oil-cooler like the one you want to install and developed a different one that won't cause as much issue.

So your suggestion is for us to not use oil coolers because GM doesn't, and come up with a custom system similar to what GM uses. Great, we'll get right on that.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:19 PM

Ok, let me put this more on your level.

Plate cooler gets oil too cold.
Manufacturer got rid of plate system and spent time/money to develop a cooler that would not make oil cold.
If oil not too hot, don't make oil too cold because of imagined problem.
Learn from big corporation. When big company spend money, usually viewed as a necessity.

Better?

Dark Sarcasm 04-28-2011 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079654)
Ok, let me put this more on your level.

Plate cooler gets oil too cold.
Manufacturer got rid of plate system and spent time/money to develop a cooler that would not make oil cold.
If oil not too hot, don't make oil too cold because of imagined problem.
Learn from big corporation. When big company spend money, usually viewed as a necessity.

Better?

Ok, once again, youre trying to relate GM to the Z. GM had problems with oil coolers and redesigned their crap, [sarcasm] SOOOOOO every oil cooler must be crap and therefore not used until it matches GMs far superior engineering. [/sarcasm]

220+ degree oil temps in a Z is not healthy for an engine, IMO. From an engineering standpoint it might be fine. Either way, I DONT GIVE A F*** about GMs experiences with oil coolers on Vettes.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Sarcasm (Post 1079659)
Ok, once again, youre trying to relate GM to the Z. GM had problems with oil coolers and redesigned their crap, [sarcasm] SOOOOOO every oil cooler must be crap and therefore not used until it matches GMs far superior engineering. [/sarcasm]

220+ degree oil temps in a Z is not healthy for an engine, IMO. From an engineering standpoint it might be fine. Either way, I DONT GIVE A F*** about GMs experiences with oil coolers on Vettes.

-220* oil temps are just fine.

-This is a discussion about engines and oil and manufacturer names are just incidental.

-Plate style coolers tend to over-cool the oil. Further, unless you install a bypass for them, they aren't the safest setup. You can of course install a thermostat or buy a plate cooler with a thermostat in it, but the point remains that you are doing this because in your mind 220* oil temps are too hot.

-Check your "IMO" at the door IMO is worthless in a technical thread. For once try to support your emotionally charged BS with fact instead of Fanboi nonsense.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079654)
Ok, let me put this more on your level.

Plate cooler gets oil too cold.
Manufacturer got rid of plate system and spent time/money to develop a cooler that would not make oil cold.
If oil not too hot, don't make oil too cold because of imagined problem.
Learn from big corporation. When big company spend money, usually viewed as a necessity.

Better?

Do you know how we can modify our engine blocks coolant/oil channels to achieve the same affect that GM is doing? Your "contributions" on these forums is seen as little more than trolling.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079645)
believe it or not, for whatever reason driving with the AC on causes the oil temps to go down.

This is because the ECM response to the A/C on by turning on the hi-speed cooling fans. It moves more air in the engine bay/through the radiator which cools the coolant which in turn will lower oil temps a bit.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079669)
This is because the ECM response to the A/C on by turning on the hi-speed cooling fans. It moves more air in the engine bay/through the radiator which cools the coolant which in turn will lower oil temps a bit.

im sure it is, I just find it hard to believe, I've seen oil temps drop as much as 30 degrees.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079667)
Do you know how we can modify our engine blocks coolant/oil channels to achieve the same affect that GM is doing? Your "contributions" on these forums is seen as little more than trolling.

You missed the boat. I did not intend for you to undertake any such engineering. I simply posted that little-known information as a way of showing you how much issue a plate-style cooler can cause that a corporation as large as GM, after implementing it on a car for half a decade, would spend the time and money to get rid of it. That's all. Now if you want to go and add it to your Nissan because its not a GM and so no information pertaining to oil and engines that GM has is pertinent to you, go for it, man, I really don't give a damn, just trying to throw some info out there for people to ponder before they do something that they THINK is a good idea because IN THEIR OPINION 220* is TOO HOT for an engine.

Nissan put the limp-mode at 260. Probably put it at a safe point.

If you want to talk about trolling, lets talk about people encouraging others to spend money on **** they don't need because of their opinions.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079675)
im sure it is, I just find it hard to believe, I've seen oil temps drop as much as 30 degrees.

What kind of coolant temp drop do you see, and which one drops first?

Red__Zed 04-28-2011 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079615)
No, you shouldn't.

GM used to put a plate/fin style oil cooler in the Z06. They no-longer do. The ZR1 doesn't have one, either.

Oil coolers cause problems on the street. Now GM has an oil-cooler that uses the coolant to regulate oil temp. It lives by the oil-pan and has no fins, etc. It simply moves the coolant and oil near each other to keep them roughly the same temp.

A lot of Z06 owners from previous years are only hitting 135-155* on the highway oil-temp. My car runs 185-200* on the highway, depending on ambient temp.

So MUCH BETTER for the car.

I would suggest you take a note from GM who REMOVED an oil-cooler like the one you want to install and developed a different one that won't cause as much issue.


There's actually a lot about this I agree with.

A lot of Z owners jumped on the bandwagon, feeling the need to install an oil cooler on the car. It's simply not necessary for most users, and many street-driven cars won't get the oil up to proper operating temps with an oil cooler installed.

I've seen plenty of users bragging that their oil temps stay below 170 with their cooler. At that temp, most oils aren't properly protecting your engine. Ideally, you want temps of around 190 during commuting, and most synthetics these days work best between 220-250*, which is where you want to be during hardcore driving.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079677)
You missed the boat. I did not intend for you to undertake any such engineering. I simply posted that little-known information as a way of showing you how much issue a plate-style cooler can cause that a corporation as large as GM, after implementing it on a car for half a decade, would spend the time and money to get rid of it. That's all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert
I would suggest you take a note from GM who REMOVED an oil-cooler like the one you want to install and developed a different one that won't cause as much issue.

Right, you didnt exactly say "design a better system" you just said "dont run a system that has some drawbracks, even though there is no alternative."

220 oil temp is safe yes, but i easily saw 240+ on the street here in NY. While the temperatures wont damage the engine, they certainly resulted in noticeable performance loss, not to mention the fact that the oil itself will thin out and wear down faster at those temperatures.

daisuke149 04-28-2011 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079654)
Ok, let me put this more on your level.

Plate cooler gets oil too cold.
Manufacturer got rid of plate system and spent time/money to develop a cooler that would not make oil cold.
If oil not too hot, don't make oil too cold because of imagined problem.
Learn from big corporation. When big company spend money, usually viewed as a necessity.
Better?

Because the last 5 years have taught us that big companies will definitely spend money where they deem it necessary for the regular ol consumer.... yeah....

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079666)
-220* oil temps are just fine.

-This is a discussion about engines and oil and manufacturer names are just incidental.

-Plate style coolers tend to over-cool the oil. Further, unless you install a bypass for them, they aren't the safest setup. You can of course install a thermostat or buy a plate cooler with a thermostat in it, but the point remains that you are doing this because in your mind 220* oil temps are too hot.

-Check your "IMO" at the door IMO is worthless in a technical thread. For once try to support your emotionally charged BS with fact instead of Fanboi nonsense.

before your hashpoint of telling him to keep his IMO out (bolded for you), you simply stated your own opinion as well. Except for you didnt add "IMO". Otherwise as you told him, support your "tend" to statement.

Although I am sure that there are bad oil cooler setups out there. Same way there are situations where an oil cooler is also needed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079615)
No, you shouldn't.

GM used to put a plate/fin style oil cooler in the Z06. They no-longer do. The ZR1 doesn't have one, either.

Oil coolers cause problems on the street. Now GM has an oil-cooler that uses the coolant to regulate oil temp. It lives by the oil-pan and has no fins, etc. It simply moves the coolant and oil near each other to keep them roughly the same temp.

A lot of Z06 owners from previous years are only hitting 135-155* on the highway oil-temp. My car runs 185-200* on the highway, depending on ambient temp.

So MUCH BETTER for the car.

I would suggest you take a note from GM who REMOVED an oil-cooler like the one you want to install and developed a different one that won't cause as much issue.

Since you seem to be so passionate and informed regarding that style cooler, why not develop it yourself? sell it to everyone and make a killing on it? That is unless, its not gonna be easy to develop, take too much time and money, isnt worth it. And so we are left with the options presented to the OP in the first place.. a 19 or 25 row with a thermostatic plate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079650)
So your suggestion is for us to not use oil coolers because GM doesn't, and come up with a custom system similar to what GM uses. Great, we'll get right on that.

Yah its funny that we should follow in GM's footsteps.. since they obviously employee the best engineers in the world. Definitely better than BMW, who does use a oil cooler on their cars instead of a "lets put coolant near oil!" box.

Dark Sarcasm 04-28-2011 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079666)
-220* oil temps are just fine..

maybe, but installing an oil cooler to keep temps at 200 is fine also

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079666)
--This is a discussion about engines and oil and manufacturer names are just incidental. ..

no, its not incedental, you placed GM into this thread as if no one should use oil coolers b/c of GMs crap.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079666)
--Plate style coolers tend to over-cool the oil. Further, unless you install a bypass for them, they aren't the safest setup. You can of course install a thermostat or buy a plate cooler with a thermostat in it, but the point remains that you are doing this because in your mind 220* oil temps are too hot. ..

^ NOW THAT ^ would be a great post that brings a good technical point to the thread. And yet it had nothing to do with Corvette ********.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079666)
---Check your "IMO" at the door IMO is worthless in a technical thread. For once try to support your emotionally charged BS with fact instead of Fanboi nonsense.

ok

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079693)
Right, you didnt exactly say "design a better system" you just said "dont run a system that has some drawbracks, even though there is no alternative."

220 oil temp is safe yes, but i easily saw 240+ on the street here in NY. While the temperatures wont damage the engine, they certainly resulted in noticeable performance loss, not to mention the fact that the oil itself will thin out and wear down faster at those temperatures.

Oil gets well over 300* in the engine at certain points in its cycle. 240* in the pan isn't going to kill it. Yes, it will break down a touch faster, but with a good oil that shouldn't be an issue. It's well within the oil's designed operating parameters.

On the flip side, if you put a cooler in there, during the rest of your normal driving the oil might well be 150-170* and not protect nearly as well as it is thicker, has more resistance to flow, hurts fuel economy, and is not up to it's designed operating point.

There is a reason GM went to the trouble of preventing their cars from running around with mid 100* oil-temps.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Sarcasm (Post 1079703)
maybe, but installing an oil cooler to keep temps at 200 is fine also



no, its not incedental, you placed GM into this thread as if no one should use oil coolers b/c of GMs crap.



^ NOW THAT ^ would be a great post that brings a good technical point to the thread. And yet it had nothing to do with Corvette ********.



ok

Well noone gives a damn that Nissan refuses to put a cooler in the car. I figured if I introduced the fact that another company actually spent R&D money to REMOVE one half a decade into the production cycle, maybe people would take note. Nah. People still want to buy a damn oil-cooler when the needle crests 220*.

You can turn this into a brand-war all you want. I really don't care. I provided you with a real-world example of a manufacturer changing production 5-years in, and spending money to do it. You want to make it a pissing contest? Have at it. Everyone else can take the point as it was meant.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigZ (Post 1078898)
If I do not intend on bringing my 370z to the track should I still invest in an oil cooler?

I intend on buying headers, high flow cats , intake, cat back and a tune for the car over the next year. SHould I budget an oil cooler too?

Dave B

THAT is who my post was aimed at. The OP.

If you track your Z, by all means, I think it should have an oil-cooler. One with a bypass and thermostat.

If you don't track it, and aren't hitting limp mode, don't get one.

My posts in this thread have been about people who want an oil-cooler "just because they think...". Not people who actually tap the limp-mode.

-------

As to GM and their engineers, there is a reason Ferrari and a lot of others pay GM royalties for the technologies they have developed. Say whatever you want, but Nissan had to rent their engine technology from Ford. Ferrari gets their active suspension from GM, and lots of others barrow from elsewhere.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079704)
Oil gets well over 300* in the engine at certain points in its cycle. 240* in the pan isn't going to kill it. Yes, it will break down a touch faster, but with a good oil that shouldn't be an issue. It's well within the oil's designed operating parameters.

On the flip side, if you put a cooler in there, during the rest of your normal driving the oil might well be 150-170* and not protect nearly as well as it is thicker, has more resistance to flow, hurts fuel economy, and is not up to it's designed operating point.

There is a reason GM went to the trouble of preventing their cars from running around with mid 100* oil-temps.

Your "follow GM" solution holds no value here, GM did not just remove the cooler, they designed the engine in a way to keep oil temps inline. For those of us that dont want our oil temperatures in a range where it affects performance and breaks down oil faster, all we can do is run oil coolers with a thermostatic plate.

Dark Sarcasm 04-28-2011 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079708)
Well noone gives a damn that Nissan refuses to put a cooler in the car. I figured if I introduced the fact that another company actually spent R&D money to REMOVE one half a decade into the production cycle, maybe people would take note. Nah. People still want to buy a damn oil-cooler when the needle crests 220*..

oh thank you oh great Vette prophet for bestowing upon us great Chevy facts.

daisuke149 04-28-2011 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079708)
Well noone gives a damn that Nissan refuses to put a cooler in the car. I figured if I introduced the fact that another company actually spent R&D money to REMOVE one half a decade into the production cycle, maybe people would take note. Nah. People still want to buy a damn oil-cooler when the needle crests 220*.

You can turn this into a brand-war all you want. I really don't care. I provided you with a real-world example of a manufacturer changing production 5-years in, and spending money to do it. You want to make it a pissing contest? Have at it. Everyone else can take the point as it was meant.



THAT is who my post was aimed at. The OP.

If you track your Z, by all means, I think it should have an oil-cooler. One with a bypass and thermostat.

If you don't track it, and aren't hitting limp mode, don't get one.

My posts in this thread have been about people who want an oil-cooler "just because they think...". Not people who actually tap the limp-mode.

-------

As to GM and their engineers, there is a reason Ferrari and a lot of others pay GM royalties for the technologies they have developed. Say whatever you want, but Nissan had to rent their engine technology from Ford. Ferrari gets their active suspension from GM, and lots of others barrow from elsewhere.

yes in a world like we have today, companies always borrow things from others because its cheaper, not because its the best solution.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079717)
Your "follow GM" solution holds no value here, GM did not just remove the cooler, they designed the engine in a way to keep oil temps inline. For those of us that dont want our oil temperatures in a range where it affects performance and breaks down oil faster, all we can do is run oil coolers with a thermostatic plate.

Regular 'vette has no cooler. Does just fine with oil temps 220-240 all day long, but hey, you guys blow your $$ however you want. If you feel better getting groceries with an oil-cooler, knock yourselves out.

esfourteen 04-28-2011 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daisuke149 (Post 1079721)
yes in a world like we have today, companies always borrow things from others because its cheaper, not because its the best solution.

actually im sure what he is referring to is the GTR cylinder wall tech that someone developed at Ford, which is really bad *** :icon17:

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079729)
actually im sure what he is referring to is the GTR cylinder wall tech that someone developed at Ford, which is really bad *** :icon17:

yes, and MRC that everyone is borrowing from GM because they can't beat it.

daisuke149 04-28-2011 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079729)
actually im sure what he is referring to is the GTR cylinder wall tech that someone developed at Ford, which is really bad *** :icon17:

not doubting good things come from it. But when you compare what ford has (in your reference), which they found to work for what they wanted, versus spending time/money developing something better... that perhaps might have given the GTR a better edge? hypothetically there are thousands if not millions of scenario's to wonder about

Convenience is the thing though and big companies will always look after their pocket books first especially if they know the consumers will simply just sit back and take it.

Either way this is running very off topic.

If OP wants peace of mind, get a 19 or 25 row with a thermostatic plate. Even if you dont track it but plan to "enjoy" the car. Some people in our mountain run in 68-72 degree weather were hitting 260+. At the same time, a NISMO that tracked their car without the oil cooler didnt hit limp mode on a very hot track day. Every car, every day, every location is different and only you can judge what will be best for your situations, unless one of us is your twin and follows you around everyday

esfourteen 04-28-2011 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImportConvert (Post 1079728)
Regular 'vette has no cooler. Does just fine with oil temps 220-240 all day long, but hey, you guys blow your $$ however you want. If you feel better getting groceries with an oil-cooler, knock yourselves out.

That would be great if our cars stayed in the 220-240 range, I could only do that with the AC on. Oil cooler keeps me in the 170-220 range. Are you bored yet? I am.

ImportConvert 04-28-2011 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esfourteen (Post 1079741)
That would be great if our cars stayed in the 220-240 range, I could only do that with the AC on. Oil cooler keeps me in the 170-220 range. Are you bored yet? I am.

Everyone's situation is different I guess. However, OP has no problem. He was just asking if he should get it "just because".

My friend's 370Z gets the piss beat out of it and is totally neglected and does just fine with CAI and exhaust.

Like you said though, everyone's area is different. Here in the hot humid south it may be better than at altitude, for example.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2