Nissan 370Z Forum
Page 6 of 11 « First 45 6 78 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   How is there not a class action against Nissan yet? Anyone want to step up? (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/35386-how-there-not-class-action-against-nissan-yet-anyone-want-step-up.html)

shadoquad 04-26-2011 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1074715)
Yep. It always drives me nuts when people reference that McD's lawsuit without understanding what actually happened.
Well, it doesn't help that every coffee cup bears a "contents may be hot" warning, which is patently obvious to anyone who enjoys hot coffee.

The lawsuit itself may not have been frivolous, but the resultant disclaimers are silly.

KillerBee370 04-26-2011 11:54 AM
Oh yeah... as far as this thread is concerned, the OP needs to learn about what constitutes a class action lawsuit. This doesn't even compute and in no way would a judge ever even hear such a matter.

Bodily harm or actual breaking a contract are usually in order just as a starting point...

Lug 04-26-2011 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad (Post 1074717)
Well, it doesn't help that every coffee cup bears a "contents may be hot" warning, which is patently obvious to anyone who enjoys hot coffee.

The lawsuit itself may not have been frivolous, but the resultant disclaimers are silly.
Also, the fact that the temp of the MickyD coffee was identical to many of it's competitors AND the same as many home coffee makers on the market suggests the lady's lawer wwas very good at jury selection. :D

KillerBee370 04-26-2011 12:22 PM
http://www.palmbeachlawyer.info/wp-c...t%20coffee.jpg

b1adesofcha0s 04-26-2011 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerBee370 (Post 1074771)
:icon18:

happytheman 04-26-2011 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerBee370 (Post 1074771)
ROFLMFA0!!:bowrofl:

dad 04-26-2011 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerBee370 (Post 1074721)
Oh yeah... as far as this thread is concerned, the OP needs to learn about what constitutes a class action lawsuit. This doesn't even compute and in no way would a judge ever even hear such a matter.

Bodily harm or actual breaking a contract are usually in order just as a starting point...
What?

GZ3 04-26-2011 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6MT (Post 1074716)
:iagree: Grow up people. If the Z is so bad, why do you own one?
??

Nobody buys a car knowing all the trouble its gonna give them, that doenst make any sense!? I would have never bought mine if i knew it was gonna be a total failure consuming oil. I think its good that there are laws that protect the consumer, but a class action lawsuit for a gas guage deficiency is a little extreme

VCuomo 04-26-2011 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frost (Post 1073889)
This is a worse idea for a lawsuit than the bish who spilled the coffee in her lap.
Go read the facts of that case and you may change your mind...

semtex 04-26-2011 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerBee370 (Post 1074721)
Oh yeah... as far as this thread is concerned, the OP needs to learn about what constitutes a class action lawsuit. This doesn't even compute and in no way would a judge ever even hear such a matter.

Bodily harm or actual breaking a contract are usually in order just as a starting point...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad (Post 1074802)
What?
I think KillerBee is pointing out that in order to have a cause of action, one must show that s/he has either actually suffered damage (i.e., some sort of loss), or that a contract has been breached.

kenchan 04-26-2011 12:39 PM
i LOL'ed at blazing hot coffee. :D

kielbasa16 04-26-2011 12:44 PM
Well the new one (not sure how new) McDonalds is facing is a claim that they should not have toys in their Happy Meals. I dont have all the facts, but the basic premise is that because the Happy Meal has toys that appeal to children, it forces parents to buy their kids the food.

shadoquad 04-26-2011 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kielbasa16 (Post 1074832)
Well the new one (not sure how new) McDonalds is facing is a claim that they should not have toys in their Happy Meals. I dont have all the facts, but the basic premise is that because the Happy Meal has toys that appeal to children, it forces parents to buy their kids the food.
I hope that suit goes down in flames. Happy Meals are marketing, but is McD's alone in this? And so what if they are? If kids say they want McDonald's for food, the adult of the household can still say "no". You know, the adult, the legally responsible one? That party can dictate what the minors eat, after all it is their job.

GZ3 04-26-2011 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kielbasa16 (Post 1074832)
Well the new one (not sure how new) McDonalds is facing is a claim that they should not have toys in their Happy Meals. I dont have all the facts, but the basic premise is that because the Happy Meal has toys that appeal to children, it forces parents to buy their kids the food.
:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::thumbsdown:[

are you serious? wow

b1adesofcha0s 04-26-2011 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kielbasa16 (Post 1074832)
Well the new one (not sure how new) McDonalds is facing is a claim that they should not have toys in their Happy Meals. I dont have all the facts, but the basic premise is that because the Happy Meal has toys that appeal to children, it forces parents to buy their kids the food.
That's just retarded. If they stop selling toys with the Happy Meal, it will kill most of their sales.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.
Page 6 of 11 « First 45 6 78 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2