![]() |
Okay, hope THIS hasn't been posted: Road & Track Magazine - Clash of the Coupes: 2009 Nissan 370Z vs. 2008 Porsche Cayman S (4/2009)
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 278
Drives: ‘14 370Z, Black, 7AT
Rep Power: 6727 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Okay, hope THIS hasn't been posted:
Road & Track Magazine - Clash of the Coupes: 2009 Nissan 370Z vs. 2008 Porsche Cayman S (4/2009) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]()
I am rather happy with the results. I still think the Z is the better choice regardless of price. The Cayman is too bland...it handles well and looks good, but its too mainstream and the interior isn't exactly astonishing. Porsche needs a serious update to their interiors...the flat pannel isnt cutting it.
I think the Z is a lot more fun around a track AND around town. Its more special too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco
Age: 57
Posts: 551
Drives: 06 350 ZR CS
Rep Power: 300 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Chef Greg At Your Service ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kommie kali
Posts: 1,238
Drives: 2015 Audi S5; 6spd.
Rep Power: 10325 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Well when they test the new 09 cayman i'm pretty sure it will out perform the 370z. If I could afford the 09 cayman I would probably get it, but then again I I would spend an extra 10k or so to get the GTR.
![]() Quote:
__________________
Mudders milk ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Paradise
Posts: 133
Drives: Z34 future owner
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
If they tested against the 2009 Cayman S, the Z would have been creamed. Against the 08 Cayman S it was able to hold its own. But it would have been more competitive if not for the heat issue.
R&T exposed the Z's overheating oil issue. As noted in this thread, this issue is the Z's "achilles heel": First track experience today ! Some good, some really bad It seems this test car was not one of the early "ringer" press cars which had oil coolers installed. Nissan needs to fix this on the 2010 cars, otherwise the Z will not be track competitive! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: nj
Posts: 177
Drives: RRSC
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
You clearly missed my point - all I am saying is that 2009 cayman would have performed even better than 2008. 0.2 secs could mean one or two car lengths, perhaps even more by the time they hit 100mph. BTW, I am NOT a fan of cayman. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 352
Drives: 09 370Z / 91 300ZXTT
Rep Power: 186 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Magnetic Black 2009 370Z / Pearl Yellow 1991 300ZXTT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Paradise
Posts: 133
Drives: Z34 future owner
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
OTOH, the Z is marketed as serious sports car. This heat issue is a weak spot that Nissan knows about. Having the car go into limp mode and lowering the rev limit to 6500 is Nissan's fix, but it cripples the car's performance. You don't need to add oil & diff coolers to most other cars if you want to track your car. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 221
Drives: Very slow Nismo 370
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
I'm kind of surprised on acceleration numbers on the Z when it comes to 100mph and up. I would think it would be faster than the 2008 Cayman S when it comes to tripple digits.
Z is begging for a shorter FD. 3rd gear on that car is just too long. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 20 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I found a 0-60 at 5.2 kind of odd. We've already seen 5.1, 4.9, 4.8, 4.7 and 5.3. This range is pretty extreme even taking into account variations due to elevation and temp.
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Road & Track gets it wrong | semtex | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 45 | 05-02-2009 08:28 PM |
Road and Track tests 370Z (no 56K) | Namir | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 20 | 02-23-2009 09:50 AM |
ROAD & TRACK Video - Full Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | sbsmoov | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 12-01-2008 11:05 PM |
Road and Track: Top 5 Twisty-Road Tamers, Nissan 370Z | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 2 | 11-28-2008 03:51 PM |
Road and Track Magazine recent news on the 370Z | admin | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 0 | 09-26-2008 03:55 AM |