Deciding between s2000 and 370z.

SkyZ · 05-30-2010, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilive2win

check out the best times at the end between the s2k and the z here in this video...

heyyyy the guy in the Z is using syncrorev match

frost · 05-30-2010, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6spd

personally, i would take internet comments/opinions with a grain of salt... except this one, and this one, and this one...................

test drive both, good night.

What?!?!? I get all my advice off the interwebz. Think of all the time I save not having to think for myself!

daleks · 05-30-2010, 01:08 PM

I cross shopped the S2000 when purchasing my old 350Z. Coming from a Civic Si I liked the high red-line, but knew I needed more low-end torque for a daily driver. Now the 370Z has a better interior and more modern tech, but you should be able to pick up an S2000 for significantly cheaper.

DarkZide · 05-30-2010, 01:39 PM

A friend of mine just put a turbo kit on his s2000 and made 300whp and 198wtq. Not even as much wheel tq as a stock 370 and about the same whp as a 370 with full exhaust. While it weighs 300~ lbs less, that still pretty weak.

I think guys look like homo's in a 2 seater convertible anyway.

Vegitto-kun · 05-30-2010, 01:41 PM

I personally love the S2000's look but I prefer the 370

also don't want to buy second hand cars since you never know what happened to them

Zsteve · 05-30-2010, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkZide

A friend of mine just put a turbo kit on his s2000 and made 300whp and 198wtq. Not even as much wheel tq as a stock 370 and about the same whp as a 370 with full exhaust. While it weighs 300~ lbs less, that still pretty weak.

I think guys look like homo's in a 2 seater convertible anyway.

198 tq sounds kinda off. I had a 4 cyl turbo and with a chip it had 300 tq and that was a small turbo for low end power. I dont think he matched the right turbo for the car.

DarkZide · 05-30-2010, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zsteve

198 tq sounds kinda off. I had a 4 cyl turbo and with a chip it had 300 tq and that was a small turbo for low end power. I dont think he matched the right turbo for the car.

I dont remember the exact trims of what he bought but they did sound way too big for such a small motor.

You made 300wtq out of a 4cyl? Which one?

Zsteve · 05-30-2010, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkZide

I dont remember the exact trims of what he bought but they did sound way too big for such a small motor.

You made 300wtq out of a 4cyl? Which one?

Audi TT 2.0T. It had 280 hp and 300 tq with a chip and downpipe. But it was FWD so it had to be feathered off the start.

UNKNOWN_370 · 05-30-2010, 03:17 PM

Don't go by what you hear. Lat acceleration is way higher on the Z, ridgidity is higher. The S2000 is dated imho. Roadsters are not my cup of tea.
But hey... test drive em both instead of getting opinions. Make your own opinion. But just remember, when someone can't say something nice about a car with a legendary reputation? That's called HATE and there opinions are worthless. And that goes for all brands, I'm not saying that cuz we in the Z forum.

JACKPAC · 05-30-2010, 03:23 PM

I didn't have an S2000, but I did have a RSX type S, which is a honda 4cl with a high rev line. It was fun, but to get anywhere quick you really have to ring out each gear. Same as in the S, I would assume. The Z is so much more effortless and more fun to drive on a day to day basis.

DarkZide · 05-30-2010, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zsteve

Audi TT 2.0T. It had 280 hp and 300 tq with a chip and downpipe. But it was FWD so it had to be feathered off the start.

I knew it wasnt a honda

I even think the NSX is a waste of money. a C6 z06 is superior in basically every way, and for less money.

chuckd05 · 05-31-2010, 05:59 PM

I had a 01 s2000 and a 03 s 2000 ( one was totaled out, and I got another , I was T boned at an intersection while waiting to make a left by a drunk ) Held up REALLY well I was impressed, I walked away fine and the guy was going 40ish mph Id guess ( he fell asleep )

S2000 is a sick car to drive, but its slower and smaller.

I loved the s2000 but I think I love my 370 more than the s2000.

But neither of them dissapointed...

I am also willing to bet that 97% of the guys on s2ki are talking out of their *** and have no real experience behind the wheel of 370s because the car has a ton more than just power. Most honda guys are nissan haters so its to be expected.

Red370 · 05-31-2010, 06:27 PM

im still trying to figure out why these cars are even being compared, the Z is in a completely different class. Period.

DarkZide · 05-31-2010, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red370

im still trying to figure out why these cars are even being compared, the Z with sport package is in a completely different class. Period.

Fixed.

AK370Z · 05-31-2010, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyZ

heyyyy the guy in the Z is using syncrorev match

That guy is Seiji Ara, winner of 24 Hours of Le Mans ('04)

05-31-2010, 05:59 PM	#27 (permalink)
chuckd05 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NY Posts: 2,391 Drives: No longer a Z Rep Power: 20	I had a 01 s2000 and a 03 s 2000 ( one was totaled out, and I got another , I was T boned at an intersection while waiting to make a left by a drunk ) Held up REALLY well I was impressed, I walked away fine and the guy was going 40ish mph Id guess ( he fell asleep ) S2000 is a sick car to drive, but its slower and smaller. I loved the s2000 but I think I love my 370 more than the s2000. But neither of them dissapointed... I am also willing to bet that 97% of the guys on s2ki are talking out of their *** and have no real experience behind the wheel of 370s because the car has a ton more than just power. Most honda guys are nissan haters so its to be expected. __________________ 09 370Z 6M PW - FBO Best 1/4 mile = 12.926 @ 109 SOLD -- 08 BMW 135i - FBO 12.1@120mph SOLD -- white 09 e92 335 Coupe Mtech - 11.9 @ 119 :-)

05-31-2010, 06:27 PM	#28 (permalink)
Red370 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany Posts: 4,391 Drives: your mom to church Rep Power: 296	im still trying to figure out why these cars are even being compared, the Z is in a completely different class. Period. __________________ 2011 Mustang 5.0 \| 3.55's \| Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe \| Magnaflow Muffler Delete \| JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The 370Z vs. the Honda S2000	avitech	New 370Z Owner	37	06-02-2010 07:39 AM
Deciding what car to get	Andrew62	Introduction	13	07-27-2009 10:23 AM
Best Motoring Brake Test: 370Z vs 135i vs S2000 vs Cayman S	AK370Z	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	10	03-20-2009 04:51 PM
S2000 owner, just admiring the new 370z	RayYay	New 370Z Owner	23	03-20-2009 10:29 AM
Best Motoring 370Z Accelaration 0-400m vs 135i vs S2000	AK370Z	Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery	10	02-10-2009 07:44 PM

05-30-2010, 01:08 PM	#18 (permalink)
daleks Enthusiast Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: St. Louis Posts: 424 Drives: 2011 Evo X MR Rep Power: 15	I cross shopped the S2000 when purchasing my old 350Z. Coming from a Civic Si I liked the high red-line, but knew I needed more low-end torque for a daily driver. Now the 370Z has a better interior and more modern tech, but you should be able to pick up an S2000 for significantly cheaper.

05-30-2010, 01:39 PM	#19 (permalink)
DarkZide Enthusiast Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: TN Posts: 291 Drives: 2010 370z BC M6 Rep Power: 15	A friend of mine just put a turbo kit on his s2000 and made 300whp and 198wtq. Not even as much wheel tq as a stock 370 and about the same whp as a 370 with full exhaust. While it weighs 300~ lbs less, that still pretty weak. I think guys look like homo's in a 2 seater convertible anyway.

05-30-2010, 01:41 PM	#20 (permalink)
Vegitto-kun A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: USA Posts: 2,011 Drives: 09 370Z Rep Power: 262	I personally love the S2000's look but I prefer the 370 also don't want to buy second hand cars since you never know what happened to them

05-30-2010, 03:17 PM	#24 (permalink)
UNKNOWN_370 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: ny'r livn in tx Posts: 8,687 Drives: well over 130m.p.h. Rep Power: 14858	Don't go by what you hear. Lat acceleration is way higher on the Z, ridgidity is higher. The S2000 is dated imho. Roadsters are not my cup of tea. But hey... test drive em both instead of getting opinions. Make your own opinion. But just remember, when someone can't say something nice about a car with a legendary reputation? That's called HATE and there opinions are worthless. And that goes for all brands, I'm not saying that cuz we in the Z forum.

05-30-2010, 03:23 PM	#25 (permalink)
JACKPAC Track Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Kentucky Posts: 516 Drives: MB 370z Rep Power: 17	I didn't have an S2000, but I did have a RSX type S, which is a honda 4cl with a high rev line. It was fun, but to get anywhere quick you really have to ring out each gear. Same as in the S, I would assume. The Z is so much more effortless and more fun to drive on a day to day basis.