![]() |
Originally Posted by gumpy i would take a lower cap v6 or 4 cylinder turbo in the z's body if it were say at least 4k less... I'm a person
|
View Poll Results: Interested in a 2.5 V6 Z? | |||
Not, not even the slightest bit |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
62 | 62.63% |
Intrigued, need more details (price, power, std equipment, mpg) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 25.25% |
Yes, I would pick a 250Z over a 370Z |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 2.02% |
Yes, but I would still take a 370Z over a 250Z |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 10.10% |
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 3,298
Drives: the 2 balled club
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
gtr
__________________
2010 LS3 C6 Silver coupe corvette |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 438
Drives: Mazda mx5 2007 6sp m
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
As some people here have already said, if this 2.5 L was along the same concept as an MX5 then yes, cause the performance would be good from lighter weight that would benefit performance, handling and braking.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 996
Drives: Sold!
Rep Power: 52 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
If that read VQ25DET(T) I'd be all for it.
__________________
Nismo Suspension: New Owners Check Here! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In the D
Posts: 3,732
Drives: v8 74 260z ;)
Rep Power: 7251 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I think your forgetting all about the vk56, or the direct injection version of it, or they could always go crazy and do up the vk56tt<------gets my vote
__________________
ANSWER PRICE LIST Answers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $0.75 Answers (requiring thought) - - - - $1.25 Answers (correct) - - - - - - - - - - $12.50 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: so cal
Posts: 793
Drives: 2009 370Z 6MT
Rep Power: 271 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
im down for a 250sx/silvia but not th z
__________________
![]() Stillen G3 CAI*Stillen CBE*Berk's HFC*Eibach Prokit*Hotchkis Sways*ichiba 15/20mm spacers*? Oil cooler*Stillen Pulley*Stillen Headers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Euless, TX [ DFW ]
Age: 42
Posts: 13,531
Drives: Nismo 09-0183 QAB
Rep Power: 49 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
As others have stated, a 2.5 RWD should be a <3klbs banger, not a V6. Take me back to my 240 days!
__________________
![]() 2009 NISMO # 0193 | QAB | Albums! | 05.04.10 (Dynojet) 291.94hp/248.28tq Oil Cooler (DIY) | Custom Headlights | GTSPEC Braces | F.I. Long Tube Headers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3886 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
So, I think I'd advocate a 270s or 270sx, smaller and with styling cues from the Z, a drop-top to directly compete with the MX5, maybe even undercut the price. If not a drop-top, then maybe a stable targa.
The problem with this approach is that so many roadsters have tried and failed to dethrone the little Mazda, and it's a niche market as it is, that the whole proposition becomes a huge risk. I don't know if it would compete, but I'd love to see what they stood up to attempt it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 (permalink) | |
Supporting Nissan Dealer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 56
Drives: Unreliable V8
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Brendan Dolan ![]() Internet Sales Boardwalk Nissan Check out my current 370Z inventory! Check out my Nissan Leaf Blog and help me pad the analytics with unique visitors... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I see this being a 240sx replacement not another Z. Keep this biootch 2700lbs get 250hp, get 220lbs tq minimum and I would be in it. The ft86 is rumored to weigh 2866lbs so... nissan needs to beat the comp.
Last edited by UNKNOWN_370; 05-10-2010 at 02:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,113
Drives: with his eyes close
Rep Power: 718 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
i think it would kinda defeats the whole reason why I bought a Z in the first place. With this heavy of a car, I think I need this big of an engine to match it. If I wanted a smaller engine, I would go with a FT86, S2000 or a Miata type of car. To be honest, if they had a production Twin Turbo Charge 370z, I would buy it in a heartbeat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|