![]() |
Quote:
gtr |
As some people here have already said, if this 2.5 L was along the same concept as an MX5 then yes, cause the performance would be good from lighter weight that would benefit performance, handling and braking.
|
If that read VQ25DET(T) I'd be all for it.
|
250z?...hell 2 da no!..haha
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
im down for a 250sx/silvia but not th z
|
yah, make a silvia or a rear drive altima using 2.5 and compete against the FT86 or watever it was called.
|
As others have stated, a 2.5 RWD should be a <3klbs banger, not a V6. Take me back to my 240 days!
|
So, I think I'd advocate a 270s or 270sx, smaller and with styling cues from the Z, a drop-top to directly compete with the MX5, maybe even undercut the price. If not a drop-top, then maybe a stable targa.
The problem with this approach is that so many roadsters have tried and failed to dethrone the little Mazda, and it's a niche market as it is, that the whole proposition becomes a huge risk. I don't know if it would compete, but I'd love to see what they stood up to attempt it. |
Quote:
|
I see this being a 240sx replacement not another Z. Keep this biootch 2700lbs get 250hp, get 220lbs tq minimum and I would be in it. The ft86 is rumored to weigh 2866lbs so... nissan needs to beat the comp.
|
i think it would kinda defeats the whole reason why I bought a Z in the first place. With this heavy of a car, I think I need this big of an engine to match it. If I wanted a smaller engine, I would go with a FT86, S2000 or a Miata type of car. To be honest, if they had a production Twin Turbo Charge 370z, I would buy it in a heartbeat.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2