Nissan 370Z Forum - 2011 Mustang GT... I think I need to re-think my next car

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)

- Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)

- - 2011 Mustang GT... I think I need to re-think my next car (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/16799-2011-mustang-gt-i-think-i-need-re-think-my-next-car.html)

Interior? I hear the corvette has crappy interior? I would still own one any day of the week soon as I feel like shelling out 45k and one day I might. My 350z had hard plastic interior, definitely not the best! Never stopped me once.
Not rare? I buy things because I like them. Rare factor is nice but come on really we are not driving 100k cars. Only reason this car is rare is because it only has 2 seats and is not practicable for most people.
The mustang v6 and v8 are nice cars. I am glad to see a American company make a good product. competition is good.

Don't even bother with Pharmacist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 474109)

Don't even bother with Pharmacist.

Pharmadouche is more like it.

You can't park within two spaces of the guy without him getting all upset about how you parked your hoopty too close to his F1-inspired 370Z.

I wish they put the motor from the FX50 into the 370z...the FX50 is about the same to 60 than the current mustang GT..and it weighs 1200lbs more than the Z...FX50 with FI would be the seks...

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarf (Post 474128)

I wish they put the motor from the FX50 into the 370z...the FX50 is about the same to 60 than the current mustang GT..and it weighs 1200lbs more than the Z...FX50 with FI would be the seks...

Anything can be done with enough money.

Except for making the Mustang into a track-able machine. That, however, is impossible. Dont even think about it. DURRRRR HURP DURP. IM PHARMACIST. DUR DEE DURP

Quote:

Originally Posted by MightyBobo (Post 474134)

Anything can be done with enough money.

Except for making the Mustang into a track-able machine. That, however, is impossible. Dont even think about it.

Its possible. I have seen it. Its the cost that gets you!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MightyBobo (Post 474134)

Anything can be done with enough money.

Except for making the Mustang into a track-able machine. That, however, is impossible. Dont even think about it.

this is a ridiculous statement. :shakes head:

the new mustang is badass. i will likely buy one when i get bored with my Z, which usually takes about 2 years for me...

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSnakeJake (Post 474156)

this is a ridiculous statement. :shakes head:

the new mustang is badass. i will likely buy one when i get bored with my Z, which usually takes about 2 years for me...

The sarcasm was obviously NOT ridiculously thick enough in my statement. Let me fix it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MightyBobo (Post 474163)

The sarcasm was obviously NOT ridiculously thick enough in my statement. Let me fix it.

Forum sarcasm flies right over my head! Sorry about that.

:bowrofl::bowrofl:

:drama:

All I know is when I was at my HPDE and a Mustang got on the track, everyone was just wondering when it was going to see the dirt. Didn't take long. I think it happened almost every session :rofl2:

EDIT: The 2 65's that were there were not the ones being talked about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MightyBobo (Post 474056)

Hey, look! Our favorite misinformed domestic basher has arrived!

Weird, I thought comparing two $30000 cars next to each other was a valid comparison, but apparently, only the V6 version of the GT...a solid $8000 less (more than likely) than the 370Z is only good enough for you.

Look, you're out of your league with mechanical knowledge, and you talk out of your *** in ALL of these conversations - please, spare us from yet another horrible read-a-thon that involves you?

if dont like what i have to say, you don't have to read it, you can go back to shoving your head up your arse.

Quote:

You can't park within two spaces of the guy without him getting all upset about how you parked your hoopty too close to his F1-inspired 370Z.

I can't wait for the day someone parks a rustbucket right next to your car in an EMPTY parking lot and kicks the door open, leaving a nice juicy scratch on your car, only for you to come to this forum and whine about it, just so i can bitchslap ur arse. now :gtfo2: and go back to your rathole

Quote:

Except for making the Mustang into a track-able machine. That, however, is impossible. Dont even think about it. DURRRRR HURP DURP. IM PHARMACIST. DUR DEE DURP

wow, you're dripping with IQ right there :rolleyes: anything can be made to be trackable even a camry with enough money. what's your point?

We will see what happens at the drag strip this summer. Im sure that i will give the stang a run for its money.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKindaGuy (Post 473961)

I don't think you are Mustang bashing...however I can say that what some folks believe is based on a lack of information about the suspension and steering configurations of Mustangs between various 2005 and 2010 models.

The Shelby GT500 did not have the same rear end suspension and steering configuration as the Roush did. In fact the Roush Mustang had the identical rear end suspension and steering configuration as the 2007 and 2008 Shelby GT (which is not the GT500). And it was the Roush Mustang with the identical 2007 and 2008 Shelby GT (not GT500) suspension and steering configuration that did indeed out-handle the 370Z on the worst curve on a special head-to-head slalom course test performed in Great Britain last summer of 2009 which was caught on video (and later used by Roush as a promotion) and I believe presented on the Roush site (and YouTube) at one time. I think it is the test you noted in your Wiki reference.

The most interesting thing about the video is that the driver of the various cars was at one time in the past an original muscle-era GT500 owner and thought the new GT500's being much better designed that the original GT500's would dominate the newly introduced 370Z. Instead the 2007/08 GT500 was dominated by the 370Z in all the runs. The 2007 GT500 just could NOT hold the curves of the track and failed miserably. However, once this proved to be the case the man put the 370Z against the Roush Mustang 427R thinking the same would happen. And to his surprise he found that the Roush repeatedly came very close to beating the 370Z in the slalom course. The difference between the 2007 GT500 and the Roush was that the Roush had the same steering and suspension as the Shelby GT (not the GT500).

It wasn't until 2010 that the Shelby GT500 was given the same suspension and steering configuration as the Shelby GT (and Roush Mustang). Also the Ford production 2010 Mustang GT is the first time the regular production GT ever received this same Shelby GT suspension and steering configuration which caused the 370Z to be nearly out-handled on the slalom course.

So your straight line thoughts may have been true for Ford production GT's and GT500's between 2005 and 2009 but it is no longer a thought or reason that can just be so leisurely assumed any more. I'd like to see the test against the 370Z redone now that the 2010 Shelby GT500 has the same suspension as the Shelby GT and Roush.

i cant find said video of the roush so if you can link it that would be great. but what you say does seem to make sense. i do remember the top gear episode the gt500 was spinning all over the place while the roush was a lot more stable in cornering and handling and was actually faster despite the power disadvantage.

edit: found this vid http://www.motortrend.com/av/roadtes...deo/index.html

numbers on paper, not the same as the z but still pretty close. still a lot of money just to make the mustang handle decently.

E bitch slap me all you want, but you were parked on the line and therefore had no right to complain. If I get hit while parked centrally in my space, I can complain all I want!