Originally Posted by zmyride To me, a Boxster is a poorman's Porsche. Aesthetically(spelling) , it's ugly. I'd take Z over Boxster anytime. In fact, if i see a Boxster on
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-12-2010, 10:21 PM | #46 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
You aren't one of those, "If its not a 911 or more expensive, its not a true Porsche" guys, are you? Because I have news for you on that whole "rear-engine layout" junk...
__________________
I don't own a car anymore. |
|
01-12-2010, 10:26 PM | #47 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So Cal baby!
Age: 51
Posts: 5,964
Drives: with passion
Rep Power: 321 |
Having owned (wifes car) and driven a Boxster for a number of years, I can give a simple point by point opinion of each.
Boxster: Pros-- - Great fair weather car (can't beat a convertible with the sun on your face).. however the 370z has this covered now as well. - Surprisingly comfortable on longer trips - Trunk space is a bit better than expected and for those really large items, you can always drop the top and use the passenger side to get that coatrack home - Superb handling in stock form. - Nice features, quality feel. Cons-- - Quick but runs outta steam compared to lesser priced cars (370z) - Chick car styling. Let's face it, this is a chick car. (The Cayman isn't much better as it's called the "Cockster") - Expensive upkeep. - For the price you pay, Porsche's ALWAYS need to come equiped with STANDARD things such as Xenon lights, multi-disc CD players, etc. They do not. - Did I mention it's a chick car? The only thing a guy could drive that looks more pathetic is a VW Beetle. 370z: Pros-- - Interior styling and quality is on par or better than that of the Boxster (well it is with my touring package anyway) - More powaa!! - I've seen women driving them and it's sexy but it's not a "chicks car" like the Boxster. - Lower maintenence costs. - Lot's more pro's... Cons-- - Small trunk space. It was better in the Boxster. - Same blind spots as a Boxster with it's top up. Porsche is a strong company but if I ever get a Porsche again (and I plan to), it will be a GT2 or GT3. Between the Boxster (or even the "Cockster") and a 370z... There's really NO comparison. 370z all the way. |
01-13-2010, 05:58 PM | #49 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida & SC
Posts: 86
Drives: 05 Tundra& 02 Subaru
Rep Power: 16 |
I still hear the same old theme
and that theme is that the Boxster and the Cayman are two different vehicles. Folks, they are not. Saying the Boxster is a poor man's porsche and buy the Cayman mentality just makes me wonder what folks are smoking. Also, saying if its not a 911 or more expensive p car then it is not worth having is absurd. I have driven the Boxster S enough to know that it handles as well as anything costiing thousands more does not run out of gas as you push it. Don't compare a new Boxster S to an older Boxster in terms of speed. They are quicker then the Z.
All cars are built to a price point and you usually get what you pay for. That goes for the Boxster or the 370Z. I guess, in hindsight, I should not have entered this post as everyone has their opinion and those do not change easily. To the original poster, buy the one that puts the biggest grin on your face. |
01-13-2010, 06:53 PM | #50 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 466
Drives: 370Z Roadster Black
Rep Power: 15 |
VW/Porsche should put the 3.8L 500hp twin turbo in the Boxster/Cayman and shake up the Super Car world. Cayman Turbo 4S. The 911 should have been killed a long time ago. Rear engine cars are really old school. Rear engine = Sh!tty design.
|
01-13-2010, 07:15 PM | #51 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14858 |
I'm sure the million dollar porsche carrera gt owners think 911 owners are a bunch of wannabe's 911 owners are probably saying 370 owners are wishin. 370 owners put down genesis coupe owners. And genny owners are putting down eclipse owners... in the end. Who gives a F*&K. Drive what you like. If u enjoy it? That's all that matters. Your neighbors garage or someones shallow opinions shouldn't even be a factor in your driving decision. Drive what you love.
|
01-13-2010, 07:24 PM | #52 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 449
Drives: 09 370z white manual
Rep Power: 16 |
I'd have to go the 370z cause I play golf and the car is useless to me if i can't take it to the course on the weekend.
However, if i was rich enough for two cars it would be the cayman... heard it's sick... |
01-13-2010, 08:25 PM | #53 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 466
Drives: 370Z Roadster Black
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
The problem is that some people don’t know what they like! All it takes for some buyers is a car commercial with hot music or a sexy car ad in a magazine with beautiful models. Some people look at the engineering and technology. When somebody asks for advice, it might aid the reinforcement needed to really enjoy the car. Shallow opinions are what some people are looking for! |
|
01-16-2010, 10:47 AM | #54 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 674
Drives: 2014 Porsche Boxster
Rep Power: 17 |
That is some statement...have you driven a Cayman? The engine placement makes a world for a difference. I love the the 370 and its front midship engine design, its a very balanced car. But the Cayman's mid engine setup is superior, drive one if you get a chance, its pretty amazing.
|
01-16-2010, 07:59 PM | #55 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 466
Drives: 370Z Roadster Black
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
A "mid-engine” car has the engine in front of the rear axle but behind the passenger compartment = best design. A “Rear engine” car = Sh!tty design. Yes, I have driven them. |
|
01-17-2010, 09:17 PM | #56 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 887
Drives: 09 NISSAN 370Z
Rep Power: 417 |
Quote:
If you actually owned one for some time, then I rest my case and I apologize. |
|
01-17-2010, 10:18 PM | #57 (permalink) | |
Grand Prix of Endurance
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,476
Drives: Mulsanne Straight
Rep Power: 26 |
Quote:
|
|
01-17-2010, 10:41 PM | #58 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 971
Drives: Nismo NO MODS!
Rep Power: 369 |
I owned a 2002 996TT (basically a 911TT). Absolutely loved it, feels small, super fast etc etc
BUT...I paid twice as much for that car then my Z (I bought it used). The mod parts are much more not to mention the maintenance! What's worse is the $ you will lose when you go to sell it regardless of what model you choose. I'm sorry to admit it but Boxsters really do seem like more of a girls car. If you don't do the 911 then do a 370, its my favorite car thus far and it makes me smile every time I start her up, you won't regret it.
__________________
Fast Intensions / NST / Mishimoto / Alpine / JDM / Volk / Brembo / Rotora / Seibon / Stillen / Password: JDM / KW / MR Works / RAW / Sun Auto / B&M / Amplified Motorsports |
01-17-2010, 11:41 PM | #59 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 466
Drives: 370Z Roadster Black
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
If the Boxster/Cayman and the 911 had the same engine/HP and raced on a road course, the 911 would finish in second place (first loser). |
|
01-17-2010, 11:55 PM | #60 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
The Boxster is only crippled because the 911 is Porsche's defacto standard as far as image goes. The sad truth is the Boxster is an optimal setup...if only it had the same engine offerings as in the 911...
__________________
I don't own a car anymore. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|