AUDI TT RS vs Nissan 370Z

shabarivas · 12-23-2009, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j.arnaldo

I know Mr. José Ordéix, V.P. and General Manager for Nissan at P.R. (Motorambar); I asked him about the 370's prices. What he told me is what I posted, amigo! I possess no ESP capabilities. BTW, the used 350 I bought ('04.5 Touring Coupe) cost $42, 975 its original owner, on November of 2003.

LOL thats a joke right?

Horseface · 12-23-2009, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang

Am I crazy for liking the first gen TTs best?

Not at all! The original (before the addition of the spoiler) was the best. Silver. Lovely looking thing. Audi has lost its mind. Now, it's too aggressive with too many angular folds.

FuszNissan · 12-23-2009, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shabarivas

LOL thats a joke right?

Don't even get him started.

Modshack · 12-23-2009, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FuszNissan

Don't even get him started.

I heard those 2004.5's were FLAWLESS...and cheap too!

FuszNissan · 12-23-2009, 02:04 PM

Mod...you had to go there.

shabarivas · 12-23-2009, 02:06 PM

uh ohs!!

nicknick · 12-23-2009, 04:39 PM

Guys the Zed was only .5 secs behind the ttrs and given they only got 5.9 secs to 100km/h for the Zed, I think they probably could've squeezed out a bit more form the Zed. The MOST BASIC of TT's in australia cost approx 70,000 and that is for a 4 cylinder. 70,000 is the price for a Zed with virtually all the fruit in australia. Now for very little if any performance gains from the TT RS you are paying approx double what the Zed is worth. I prefer the looks of the Zed hands down, performance is really on par, interior is good too. What is it with people going on about Audi interiors, i have sat in a tt, good but please take a pill, it's not heart stopping. All in all the Audi is just way too overpriced for what you are getting. Someone else here said 'Mafia prices"

BTW, the "fit" of panels etc on Japanese cars is second to none. I wish all these people who go on about the fit of German cars would suddenly become objective.

galtamar · 12-23-2009, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j.arnaldo

I know Mr. José Ordéix, V.P. and General Manager for Nissan at P.R. (Motorambar); I asked him about the 370's prices. What he told me is what I posted, amigo! I possess no ESP capabilities. BTW, the used 350 I bought ('04.5 Touring Coupe) cost $42, 975 its original owner, on November of 2003.

Ok, just go to a Nissan dealership and see the MSRP price on the car window.

P.S. I too know people at Motorambar, people who actually make the orders to the factory and have a spreadsheet with the dealership price (invoice?) and MSRP of every 2009 370Z model that is offered on PR . A close Family member used to be the one that placed the orders. Document is dated 7/31/09
370Z Base MT DNP 35,061 / MSRP 37,500
370 NISMO DNP 47,000 / MSRP 50,550

MightyBobo · 12-23-2009, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FuszNissan

Mod...you had to go there.

Ken · 12-23-2009, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC

usually german car testing is metric so

it was 0-62mph (100kmph) so thats more like 5.7 0-60... still seemed off

That's what I was thinking initially but the Z should be around 5-5.2 sec for 0-60 and to get to 62mph maybe 5.3???

Plus, they got a 4.5s with the Audi???

I think they just effed up the 0-60 run and didn't bother to redo it.....

carlos3366 · 12-24-2009, 02:32 PM

isn't the audi a 4 banger 2.0? how can you compare it to a v6 3.7.?

MightyBobo · 12-24-2009, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlos3366

isn't the audi a 4 banger 2.0? how can you compare it to a v6 3.7.?

Its...turbocharged?

370Z_Fan · 12-24-2009, 03:14 PM

Something's not right with the 370Z's 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds. All the magazines' I've read have gotten the Z to 60mph in the range of 4.6-5.2 seconds but almost a full second with these amateurs??? Either they're not pushing the car hard enough or they don't know how to drive.

kevr6 · 12-25-2009, 02:09 AM

I can tell you this....the new TT is hands down much better then the orig TT. I have a 2002 here parked in my garage! I hate driving it cause it's just a VW with an award winning body!
The new TT actually doesn't look like a chick's car and uses the Audi parts bin. Now I've only driven the VR6 models because they have always been lower maintenance then the turbos. My wife's is a 1.8T has been flashed with some suspension mods and wheels and tires. She loves her car!! I feel it suits her...being a chick.
I've noticed that the folks who talk crap about the TT probably haven't owned it(or even driven it). That's the only real way to do a comparison. Drive them back to back and you'll understand! Also everyone keeps ignoring all the features the TT has that the Z doesn't have! I've notice that the Z is extremely flexy even though I've stiffened up the susp. The stock TT is three times as stiff (0 body flex). I miss all the room I had in the TT compared to the Z (6'3" 230 lbs).
I think the TT styling is better (classy) then the Z. The Z just screams "all business" in the looks department!
And 0-60 times are really not that important when so many cars on the street are within a second of us. I'll never understand the penis size thing!
Now if they import the TTRS and I have an opportunity to purchase through work....hmm...it's all about the dollar. Even though business didn't slow down like I expected!

Supergoji · 12-25-2009, 03:17 AM

the TT-RS has a inline 5 with a single turbo.

12-23-2009, 02:04 PM	#50 (permalink)
FuszNissan A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2009 Location: St. Louis Posts: 14,275 Drives: Pure Sex Rep Power: 542	Mod...you had to go there. __________________ Mods: Too Many to list! LouFuszNissan ZDAYZ 2012

12-23-2009, 04:39 PM	#52 (permalink)
nicknick Enthusiast Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Australia Posts: 438 Drives: Mazda mx5 2007 6sp m Rep Power: 16	Guys the Zed was only .5 secs behind the ttrs and given they only got 5.9 secs to 100km/h for the Zed, I think they probably could've squeezed out a bit more form the Zed. The MOST BASIC of TT's in australia cost approx 70,000 and that is for a 4 cylinder. 70,000 is the price for a Zed with virtually all the fruit in australia. Now for very little if any performance gains from the TT RS you are paying approx double what the Zed is worth. I prefer the looks of the Zed hands down, performance is really on par, interior is good too. What is it with people going on about Audi interiors, i have sat in a tt, good but please take a pill, it's not heart stopping. All in all the Audi is just way too overpriced for what you are getting. Someone else here said 'Mafia prices" BTW, the "fit" of panels etc on Japanese cars is second to none. I wish all these people who go on about the fit of German cars would suddenly become objective. Last edited by nicknick; 12-23-2009 at 05:06 PM.

12-25-2009, 02:09 AM	#59 (permalink)
kevr6 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: N.W. Atlanta Posts: 1,515 Drives: '09 Graphite 370Z 6M Rep Power: 666	I can tell you this....the new TT is hands down much better then the orig TT. I have a 2002 here parked in my garage! I hate driving it cause it's just a VW with an award winning body! The new TT actually doesn't look like a chick's car and uses the Audi parts bin. Now I've only driven the VR6 models because they have always been lower maintenance then the turbos. My wife's is a 1.8T has been flashed with some suspension mods and wheels and tires. She loves her car!! I feel it suits her...being a chick. I've noticed that the folks who talk crap about the TT probably haven't owned it(or even driven it). That's the only real way to do a comparison. Drive them back to back and you'll understand! Also everyone keeps ignoring all the features the TT has that the Z doesn't have! I've notice that the Z is extremely flexy even though I've stiffened up the susp. The stock TT is three times as stiff (0 body flex). I miss all the room I had in the TT compared to the Z (6'3" 230 lbs). I think the TT styling is better (classy) then the Z. The Z just screams "all business" in the looks department! And 0-60 times are really not that important when so many cars on the street are within a second of us. I'll never understand the penis size thing! Now if they import the TTRS and I have an opportunity to purchase through work....hmm...it's all about the dollar. Even though business didn't slow down like I expected! __________________ *Beware...* Daily Sliding In My ZLED!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
911 Turbo vs Nissan GTR vs Audi R8 V10	AK370Z	Other Vehicles	12	12-14-2009 05:40 AM
Audi A5/S5	LETSGOEERS06	Other Vehicles	0	11-25-2009 10:38 AM
Audi TT-RS 340 BHP Fifth Gear	Asheth	Other Vehicles	6	09-03-2009 10:09 PM
Audi A5	tvfreakazoid	Other Vehicles	19	03-03-2009 09:50 PM
Audi TT	msl82	Other Vehicles	10	01-07-2009 06:27 PM

12-23-2009, 02:06 PM	#51 (permalink)
shabarivas A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sacramento, CA Posts: 2,188 Drives: 370z MB 6mt Rep Power: 914	uh ohs!!

12-24-2009, 02:32 PM	#56 (permalink)
carlos3366 Base Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Fort Worth, TX Posts: 54 Drives: 05 camry, 97 500sl Rep Power: 16	isn't the audi a 4 banger 2.0? how can you compare it to a v6 3.7.?

12-24-2009, 03:14 PM	#58 (permalink)
370Z_Fan Base Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, ON Posts: 238 Drives: 2010 MB ZR sport pkg Rep Power: 16	Something's not right with the 370Z's 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds. All the magazines' I've read have gotten the Z to 60mph in the range of 4.6-5.2 seconds but almost a full second with these amateurs??? Either they're not pushing the car hard enough or they don't know how to drive.

12-25-2009, 03:17 AM	#60 (permalink)
Supergoji Enthusiast Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Westchester NY Age: 36 Posts: 311 Drives: Z32tt / Supra tt Rep Power: 257	the TT-RS has a inline 5 with a single turbo.