yeah... thats what i was thinking for 422 hp lol... Another car by its own weight =(, oh wells i still think that car is beautiful
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-09-2009, 11:03 PM | #32 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Korova Milk Bar
Posts: 25
Drives: 06 S2000, 08 E90 M3
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I really like the new Camaro, but it's not for me. More for people cross shopping the Charger,Challenger, Mustang... Big engine, big chassis. |
|
01-09-2009, 11:12 PM | #33 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,940
Drives: Mag. Black 2009 370Z
Rep Power: 705 |
Quote:
|
|
01-09-2009, 11:12 PM | #34 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,940
Drives: Mag. Black 2009 370Z
Rep Power: 705 |
Quote:
|
|
01-09-2009, 11:52 PM | #35 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 100
Drives: 07 Honda Civic
Rep Power: 16 |
Really suprised me that one or two mentioned that skidpad results should not even be included in the discussion...Surely Car and Driver, MotorTrend, Edmunds, etc. etc. etc. have some sort of knowledge/credability somewhere along the lines of how to test and record these cars performance numbers. I would think they include skidpad for a reason, but what do I know, I'm only a Software Geek...
The only reason I'm shootin for something along the lines of the 370 and not the camaro because of basically what I see on a daily basis (driving around 40 miles to work and back): - Maybe 1 or 2 extremely nice last bodystyle SS Camaros with older dudes drivin em...they sound very nice btw... - Around 50, give or take 5, base Camaros (some with rust spots, some black cars with one tiel door, most with flowmasters ofcourse) with young kids and chicks drivin em. Again, it may be different in different areas of the US, but here that's all I've ever seen. As far as the 350z and 370z, I don't see a lot at all around here, and when I do it's usually an old dude. Nonetheless, both the camaro and 370z are great cars in each of their own categories and if one wants 4 seats and a bigger trunk, camaro is your baby, but if you want a 2 seater sports car get a Z. |
01-10-2009, 12:52 AM | #36 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 397
Drives: a car
Rep Power: 17 |
GM Delays 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Production by One Month
Source: MotorTrend.com
|
01-10-2009, 01:17 AM | #38 (permalink) | |
Retired admin
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2009, 03:54 AM | #40 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 2,875
Drives: E63 AMG
Rep Power: 228 |
I see the car is delayed, they are saying a one month delay, but I suspect it will be longer in reality. They also said that the SS (V8) model will take a lot longer to get to dealers due to the demand. Some people may not get the cars they ordered until next year. Glad I got my Z!
|
01-10-2009, 11:27 AM | #42 (permalink) | ||
Retired admin
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Quote:
Dont tell the camaro guys that. All they know is their 6 is the most powerful 6 they have ever had! And since it has high HP, it must be fast. |
||
01-10-2009, 01:45 PM | #43 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 2,875
Drives: E63 AMG
Rep Power: 228 |
Quote:
I think that GM underestimated the amount of enthusiast orders initially, which of couse will be the SS/V8 model. It's the one that I would have purchased too. From what I read over there even people with deposits may not see the cars they ordered until next year, as GM does not have the capacity to make that many SS models, plus I would imagine some of the dealers are going to slap a $10k++ mark upon some of the first models they receive. So in reality for an average Joe to buy an SS at MSRP might take 1-2 years. Who knows, by then I might be ready for a new car! |
|
01-10-2009, 02:28 PM | #44 (permalink) | |
Retired admin
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2009, 04:13 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 2
Drives: 06 GTO
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi guys, my first post in this site.
I've been very active over in the Camaro forums. I've come very close to ordering a 2010 Camaro SS. I was also pretty amazed by how many guys over in the Camaro forum think the Camaro SS will handle as well as the 370z. I posted over a Camaro5.com to try to bring them down to Earth. The 370z only weighs 3350 lbs and runs on 275 series rear tires (Touring). The Camaro SS weighs 3900 lbs and runs on 275 series rear tires. So which car do you think will handle the best? That along with the fact that the 370z is pulling .98 G's - .99 G's on the skid pad pretty much seals the deal. There's no way the Camaro SS is going to pull those kind on numbers on the skid pad. Drag strip- Camaro SS > 370Z Road course- 370Z > Camaro SS |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chevrolet Announces Pricing for the 2010 Camaro | AK370Z | Other Vehicles | 15 | 11-14-2009 12:53 PM |
370Z vs SS Camaro vs 135i | ohdeasu | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 50 | 12-15-2008 01:14 AM |