![]() |
Quote:
I do agree that buying a used Z w/o a warranty is risky business. |
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah dude, you're a clown. If you trust Carfax and/or private sellers ALL of the time, then everything I read on the internet just HAS to be true ALL of the time I guess. LOL And lazy? Really? Someone who's responsible and works hard for their money so they can support their family, buy nice things for their family and still have money left over to buy a nice new car and nice new expensive parts for it, I wouldn't exactly call lazy. Like an artist, I like starting with a new blank canvas, and buying a brand new car is just that. I don't have to go and undo a bunch of crap I don't want on that used car, and possibly find out that someone somewhere along the line cut corners and did a hack job on everything, possibly even making the car unsafe. The heck with that noise. You go ahead and buy your used cars and well... I won't. Because quite frankly, I don't give a rat's a$$ about depreciation and resale value. And next time, think ahead before shooting off your mouth about people being lazy. I could just as easily say that you're just cheap and lazy and want to buy an already modded car for a song. Mind you, modded to someone else's taste. But hey, whatever floats your boat. |
Quote:
|
^ look who is talking lol
|
Quote:
I saved about ten grand off the cost of an equivalent new model, and it has no "hack job mods" to undo. And now I can use that money on coilovers, suspension, and wheels. And my car is still under warranty. But hey, in your own words, you don't care about depreciation or resale value, so hey, go ahead and justify your purchase. If you can sleep at night, cool! awesome! i'm clapping right now and still laughing at you |
Quote:
Its a ridiculous assumption, so i'm gonna treat it like one. AND! this whole discussion is about STi's and Nismo Z's. My point is that NEITHER car is worth their MSRP, for the reason that clean used examples are available. I don't know how i could have spelled it out more clearly except ChopZ wants to take a pitchfork and light some torches to the used car market. HE can do whatever he wants with his money that makes him feel good. My point is the same: it's hard to justify $40k for an Sti or Nismo Z. |
Quote:
|
Three different tests, manual and auto, all Nismo, all reaching 105-106mph, all doing 0-60 in 5 seconds or less. the 1/4 time is out of the norm (13.3-13.6 avg), but overall, the numbers are fine.
0-60 in 5.0 13.5 @106.6mph Lotus Exige S 260 Sport vs. Nissan Nismo 370Z 0-60 in 4.9 13.5 @105.4mph 2015 Nissan 370Z Nismo First Test - Motor Trend 0-60 in 4.9 13.6@106mph 2015 Nissan 370Z NISMO Automatic – Review – Car and Driver |
Quote:
Also the new sti is 2.5??? Why's the WRX 2.0? They always been equal besides the turbo and IC layout. |
Quote:
the STI on the otherhand, great grip ofcourse, consistent clutch, fast throttle response (cobb stage1). easy to do fast launches. |
Quote:
The WRX engine is the new F20f, direct injection turbo. Bc it's new, folks speculated Subaru wasn't ready to push to 300 hp So they used the decade old 2.5 in the sti |
That makes no sense. Subaru has been pushing 2.0 engines to 300hp in Japan for YEARS. The JDM STi always had a 2.0L turbo.
|
The J spec STI has the new FA 2.0
The US spec STI has the old 2.5 FJ series. I have no idea why though. |
Quote:
On topic: These two first stated that the 370z has a 3.5 liter and then thought the "370" stands for 370 hp? Come on :facepalm: |
Quote:
I don't think that's right. It should be the same EJ20 that all jdm stis have been using |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2