nismo dyno numbers

vipor · 11-17-2009, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1slow370

no no no lets not degrade ourselves to that and keep this nissan. All i have to say is there are guys here with just the sport package and three mods later are are near 320-330. Really the nismo isn't all that great

the nismo was marketed slightly wrong is the issue. it's strictly looks and suspension. the exhaust and "ecu reflash" is very minor.

Matt · 11-17-2009, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vipor

the nismo was marketed slightly wrong is the issue. it's strictly looks and suspension. the exhaust and "ecu reflash" is very minor.

I would have seriously considered the Nismo even if all it had were the cosmetic differences (inside and out). The other stuff was just a bonus for me!

vipor · 11-17-2009, 09:36 AM

me dos

Lug · 11-17-2009, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ

I would LOVE to see what a normal 370z puts out on that dyno, because their stock 350z put out 257whp. So that's roughly a 30whp difference. Which is pretty close to the difference that a normal 370z has over a stock 350z. It is a bit higher though, so the numbers make sense. I think a normal 370z would've read in the 290 range on that dyno on that day.

254 + 26 (350Z to 370Z HP gain) = 280

280 + 18 (Nismo gain) = 298

w/o even taking in any drive train loss factor on the additional HP, the numbers add up pretty close.

Assuming 17% loss

254 + 22 = 276

276 + 15 = 291 - or about what the OP got.

MindFusion FX · 11-17-2009, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ricky bobby

maybe so but how does that camaro handle at 155 cuz the Z is pretty impressive

and how far til it breaks down?

Slynky · 11-17-2009, 11:32 AM

IMHO, the Camaro is butt-fugly in design to the 370. And, it's near comparing apples to oranges considering 2 seats > 4 seats.

Not saying the Camaro is a total waste. It can compare against other long-lived similar cars--to wit, the Mustang. But to put it in the same showcase as the 370... I don't think so.

The G35/G37 and 350Z/370Z series designs are, well, just great. Not perfect, but great. When those designs came out, Nissan scored big.

ZKindaGuy · 11-17-2009, 12:21 PM

what does the 370 Nismo have that the Base or Touring doesn't have by way of power modifications?

Matt · 11-17-2009, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKindaGuy

what does the 370 Nismo have that the Base or Touring doesn't have by way of power modifications?

A tune and CBE that, on paper, generate the 18 hp difference.

AndyO · 11-17-2009, 12:26 PM

Ugh I hate these threads, I dont own a new camaro but seriously this ricer logic is somewhat bothering me. Because its American doesnt mean it sucks. Your logic is that American sucked in the past, for the most part this is true, but the LSX engine is proven.....Its a fantastic engine, thats great for mods, and has just as much reliability as a VQ...... if you leave both stock of course. Now I make this assumption on STOCK stats. IMO the camaro is a massive improvement over the old one and many other cars. Oh and also if you are under the impression that they cannot turn youd be wrong on that too. Now they are not a Z in handling but again HUGE improvment. The people that are bashing are the same people that bash on vette handling when a vette would DESTROY a Z in all performance aspects.

wishihadnav · 11-17-2009, 12:35 PM

camaro vs 370?..lol. i like the camaro but its just a bad comparison imo.

MindFusion FX · 11-17-2009, 12:38 PM

i like the style of the camaro...but don't like the performance. aside from the handling factors..it takes a 6.2L v8 making 426hp to match the speed of the Z. Their 0-60 times are very close...5sec for the camaro and 4.7-5.1 for the Z

Edit: is it just me or does someone else see a problem with needing a 6.2L engine to make that???? waste of liters.

wishihadnav · 11-17-2009, 12:50 PM

^^camaro weighs at least 500lbs more than our cars..actually the ls motor is very light for its size..same motor as in the c6 vettes..anyhow it produces 420lbs tq...not too shabby..its a fun drive!

AndyO · 11-17-2009, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wishihadnav

^^camaro weighs at least 500lbs more than our cars..actually the ls motor is very light for its size..same motor as in the c6 vettes..anyhow it produces 420lbs tq...not too shabby..its a fun drive!

yes camaro weighs more, If u put the VQ in there it would be a 15 sec car. Not a waste of liters. Plus, just breath on the LSX and it will make more hp lol. The Camaro SS is no joke.

semtex · 11-17-2009, 01:57 PM

Nice numbers! (Be careful about posting that link to another 370 forum tho.)

ricky bobby · 11-17-2009, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyO

Ugh I hate these threads, I dont own a new camaro but seriously this ricer logic is somewhat bothering me. Because its American doesnt mean it sucks. Your logic is that American sucked in the past, for the most part this is true, but the LSX engine is proven.....Its a fantastic engine, thats great for mods, and has just as much reliability as a VQ...... if you leave both stock of course. Now I make this assumption on STOCK stats. IMO the camaro is a massive improvement over the old one and many other cars. Oh and also if you are under the impression that they cannot turn youd be wrong on that too. Now they are not a Z in handling but again HUGE improvment. The people that are bashing are the same people that bash on vette handling when a vette would DESTROY a Z in all performance aspects.

easy easy im not saying the camaro sucks but at speed and on the run aerodynamics come into play. im sure the camaro would be great in the 1/4 mile but who drives a 1/4 mile at a time(except for Vin Diesel). The camaro n vette are great american cars and i agree the newest models are the best yet. But if not going in a straight line and if i could get my Z past 155-157 im gonna give the vette a helluva run. Besides that i dont think anyone here would dispute the beauty of the 370Z compared to the others. i'd rather build the Z and outrun them all.

11-17-2009, 09:36 AM	#18 (permalink)
vipor A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Euless, TX [ DFW ] Age: 42 Posts: 13,531 Drives: Nismo 09-0183 QAB Rep Power: 49	me dos __________________ 2009 NISMO # 0193 \| QAB \| Albums! \| 05.04.10 (Dynojet) 291.94hp/248.28tq Oil Cooler (DIY) \| Custom Headlights \| GTSPEC Braces \| F.I. Long Tube Headers

11-17-2009, 11:32 AM	#21 (permalink)
Slynky Track Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: McDonough, GA Posts: 595 Drives: 2010 Red 370Z T/S/N Rep Power: 17	IMHO, the Camaro is butt-fugly in design to the 370. And, it's near comparing apples to oranges considering 2 seats > 4 seats. Not saying the Camaro is a total waste. It can compare against other long-lived similar cars--to wit, the Mustang. But to put it in the same showcase as the 370... I don't think so. The G35/G37 and 350Z/370Z series designs are, well, just great. Not perfect, but great. When those designs came out, Nissan scored big. __________________ A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life."

11-17-2009, 12:26 PM	#24 (permalink)
AndyO A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Fort Worth, TX Posts: 1,530 Drives: 05 6spd Nissan 350z Rep Power: 19	Ugh I hate these threads, I dont own a new camaro but seriously this ricer logic is somewhat bothering me. Because its American doesnt mean it sucks. Your logic is that American sucked in the past, for the most part this is true, but the LSX engine is proven.....Its a fantastic engine, thats great for mods, and has just as much reliability as a VQ...... if you leave both stock of course. Now I make this assumption on STOCK stats. IMO the camaro is a massive improvement over the old one and many other cars. Oh and also if you are under the impression that they cannot turn youd be wrong on that too. Now they are not a Z in handling but again HUGE improvment. The people that are bashing are the same people that bash on vette handling when a vette would DESTROY a Z in all performance aspects. __________________

11-17-2009, 01:57 PM	#29 (permalink)
semtex A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Behind enemy lines Age: 54 Posts: 5,995 Drives: People to drink Rep Power: 32	Nice numbers! (Be careful about posting that link to another 370 forum tho.) __________________ "There are no small accidents on this circuit." -- Ayrton Senna 316.8whp & 248 ft/lbs (Dyno Dynamics) \| 319whp & 256 ft/lbs (DynoJet) (04/23/10) Stillen G3 CAI, CBE, Pulley / F.I. LTH / GTSpec Ladder Brace / Setrab Oil Cooler / UpRev-tuned by Forged Perf.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Nismo Numbers - Check In	mdbrich	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	20	06-23-2010 09:01 AM
My numbers are bad....	HT Rambler	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	12	10-19-2009 09:09 PM
NISMO 370z DYNO SPECS	Nismo_370	Engine & Drivetrain	127	10-13-2009 01:16 AM
stock 370z dyno numbers	bmarcinczyk14	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	7	09-04-2009 10:24 PM
NISMO Body Part Numbers request	Scribe	Exterior & Interior	6	05-12-2009 01:01 AM

11-17-2009, 12:21 PM	#22 (permalink)
ZKindaGuy Track Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Ohio Posts: 699 Drives: 370Z-AT7 Tour+Sport Rep Power: 375	what does the 370 Nismo have that the Base or Touring doesn't have by way of power modifications?

11-17-2009, 12:35 PM	#25 (permalink)
wishihadnav A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: 90090 Posts: 1,851 Drives: Force Fed Nismo Rep Power: 184	camaro vs 370?..lol. i like the camaro but its just a bad comparison imo.

11-17-2009, 12:38 PM	#26 (permalink)
MindFusion FX Base Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Hollywood, FL Posts: 132 Drives: Getting a 370 Soon Rep Power: 16	i like the style of the camaro...but don't like the performance. aside from the handling factors..it takes a 6.2L v8 making 426hp to match the speed of the Z. Their 0-60 times are very close...5sec for the camaro and 4.7-5.1 for the Z Edit: is it just me or does someone else see a problem with needing a 6.2L engine to make that???? waste of liters.

11-17-2009, 12:50 PM	#27 (permalink)
wishihadnav A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: 90090 Posts: 1,851 Drives: Force Fed Nismo Rep Power: 184	^^camaro weighs at least 500lbs more than our cars..actually the ls motor is very light for its size..same motor as in the c6 vettes..anyhow it produces 420lbs tq...not too shabby..its a fun drive!