![]() |
So my first post here (other than the intro) is sure to spark a debate but I feel it's a legit question. I have been doing a lot of research
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 3
Drives: 370Z
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
![]()
So my first post here (other than the intro) is sure to spark a debate but I feel it's a legit question.
I have been doing a lot of research on the Nismo Z, as I'm 90% sure it will be my next car. But I can't understand why it's 0-60 performance is slower than other cars that have less power and/or lower HP to weight ratios. The various magazines like the handling and that is a good thing. But most will complain that it's under-powered while also complimenting the VQ as one of the best V6's ever built (I agree). Years ago the Z was described as a beast. Now it doesn't even make the list of top sports cars. What happened? Personally, I love the looks of the Nismo and I can always increase the performance. But I also wonder what happened to the once, almost legendary reputation of this car. I still want one. |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Koni at comparable stock setting? | victorofhavoc | Brakes & Suspension | 12 | 03-06-2015 09:38 PM |
slower and slower cranking up times | shfeddy | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 08-15-2014 01:56 PM |
[WTB] Stock Rear Tires or Comparable | NoVaZ | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 06-21-2013 10:20 AM |
Seems slower - is it in my mind? | intrigue | Intake/Exhaust | 19 | 04-03-2012 03:23 PM |