Wow...where did this thread go
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-13-2009, 01:08 PM | #62 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4210 |
Where do you want it to go?
I am sure we could go down a new street this forum has not seen.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
10-13-2009, 01:16 PM | #65 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,389
Drives: American
Rep Power: 28 |
Quote:
I'm just wondering why you brought another thread into here... This thread isnt about our 'dream' car being better than anyone elses. This thread has gotten its popcorn viewers because of ignorance...
__________________
2009 PW Nissan 370Z with Sports Package
Last edited by TX_370; 10-13-2009 at 01:19 PM. |
|
10-13-2009, 01:19 PM | #66 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 53
Drives: 05' BMW 330Ci ZHP
Rep Power: 16 |
....
I can appreciate the points that the "chief" is trying to make, but the car isn't going to be hundreds of pounds lighter,200+ lbs, period. If for some reason it is, you wont see it in the 370 price range. This can be exemplified in several car manufacturers. Subaru has a Spec C STI which utilizes a "lighter" aluminum trunk then the US Spec GDB-D/E/F/G chasis. It reduces the trunk lid weight by an extremely generous, maybe 4-5+ lbs(Check Japanparts.com). The seats may be lighter as well, but overall you might shed 60-80, maybe even 100lbs at most, collectively, with the trunk, seats, etc. BMW actually went pretty extreme with the CSL, but the weight reduction, I believe, wasn't sevreal hundred lbs. The CSL utilized a carbon roof, a plastic trunk, carbon shell'd seats and door panels...no a/c or power seats, radio, etc. The end result was maybe 100-150lbs, net loss. Keep in mind the car gained weight from the SMG transmission, larger more aggressive brakes, and larger wheels / tires as well. So collectively you're net weight loss isn't insane, but it's definitely there. Again, I appreciate the points being brought up, and respect them. I, as a newer member on this forum, want facts. I'm aware some of my info may be slightly off, a couple pounds, maybe more, but I can assure you my accuracy is far closer than that of other presented information. Feel free to check Japanparts.com for info on the STI Spec C Parts, for weights, and check M3forum for info on the CSL. I've been a member of the BMW, Subaru, and Honda communities, again, feel free to search what I posted. I'm not seeking to disrespect anyone, not by any means, I just want the correct info. Thanks, -Chris Last edited by Technik330; 10-13-2009 at 01:27 PM. |
10-13-2009, 01:24 PM | #68 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CA
Age: 38
Posts: 9,513
Drives: Scoobaroo
Rep Power: 3406 |
^ ooh, a logical argument. It's spelled exemplified though
When you mention the Spec C STI aluminum trunk though, bear in mind (and tell me if I'm wrong on this!) that the Z is already largely built out of aluminum. Without going carbon fiber a la CSL, there really isn't a lot of weight reduction to be had without aggressively setting up the car for racing. Good man, Technik, welcome to the 370Z forum |
10-13-2009, 01:27 PM | #69 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 352
Drives: Mustang GT
Rep Power: 237 |
Quote:
__________________
Project オレンジ 2009 (FUGLY) Grabber Orange Mustang GT // SLP loudmouth axle back // JLT intake // BamaChips Tunes // ... TheDreamer's personal mechanic |
|
10-13-2009, 01:32 PM | #70 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CA
Age: 38
Posts: 9,513
Drives: Scoobaroo
Rep Power: 3406 |
I'm thinking that's a cost cutting measure for Nissan. They produce the lightest vehicle possible that conforms to safety regulations throughout the world. One set of tools instead of worrying about getting carbon fiber this, differential that, etc. etc.
Again, the body is already aluminum, so you're pretty close to the edge as you can get in terms of shedding weight without going crazy with carbon fiber. |
10-13-2009, 01:33 PM | #71 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 53
Drives: 05' BMW 330Ci ZHP
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I believe there's some, I'm not going to say "a couple hundred pounds," but enough to notice a difference. I agree sort of gutting the car, killing the daily status of the car, you wont get extreme amount of weight reduction. Sorry, I didn't read over the whole post before starting a response, I'm at work at the moment, incognito posting is FTW.....haha not really though Thank you for the welcome, I appreciate it! Last edited by Technik330; 10-13-2009 at 01:46 PM. |
|
10-13-2009, 01:33 PM | #72 (permalink) | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 495
Drives: Z
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
In his nonsensical tirade, he mentioned cars over-seas being 300-500 lbs. lighter due to the "lack of safety regulations" and "metallurgy." He really is under the impression that cars in Japan don't have bumper-supports, side-impact beams, or perhaps even frame-rails. You are correct, though...there are lighter, more race-oriented trims levels sold elsewhere, and the Spec-C and CSL are good examples. They are not, however, related to his profound and eloquent points of view. |
|
10-13-2009, 02:01 PM | #73 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 53
Drives: 05' BMW 330Ci ZHP
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I should've posted a little more specifically, the cars I mentioned are cars that aren't available here due to our DOT regulations, which make them lighter, more agile, quicker etc becuase they can avoid these regulations. I was going to use the glass in JDM Hondas; of which I wouldn't call safe glass, like we have here. It's lighter, but breaks into sharper pieces, not like DOT glass here. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong- The cars I noted are cogent examples of what he's eluding to, less safety, better materials, higher cost Thanks, -Chris |
|
10-13-2009, 02:05 PM | #74 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greenville NC
Posts: 2,883
Drives: 370Z Sport
Rep Power: 976 |
Since this thread has deteriorated into a discussion of weight, you might want to see what it really means in real life application. 100lbs = only a tenth of a second in the quarter.
Per the calculator it takes 10hp to make up that 100lbs...Drop a few lbs or add a few HP, it's all the same in the end.. Play with your own numbers here: 1/4 Mile ET Calculator Last edited by Modshack; 10-13-2009 at 02:09 PM. |
10-13-2009, 02:14 PM | #75 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 53
Drives: 05' BMW 330Ci ZHP
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I agree add a little power, take some weight out, and you get |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airport Nissan Photoshoot (Z33 NISMO, Z34 NISMO, R35 GTR) | HKYStormFront | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 58 | 01-30-2010 12:10 PM |
Base (w/Nismo Parts - Non Nismo Z) vs Sport Package | kraphy | Engine & Drivetrain | 10 | 09-24-2009 01:15 PM |
Nismo and Nismo S-tune confusion | phantom21 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 16 | 09-20-2009 10:38 AM |