![]() |
Ahh Man...Mustang 5.0 swap???
Went with a friend to test drive mustangs. He was interested in a V-6 price fuel all that jazz...while I was there I decided to test drive a 5.0 auto. Don't know if I have become soft but it was comfy and the exhaust note sounds just right and the thing will snap your neck back. From a dead stop it seemed really slow, could be the 6 speed auto or it was that smooth and deceptive, don't really know. But off a roll, it will get up and go with authority. The V-6 mustang is as fast as the nismo... And I can drop reg in the 5.0 and the insurance is cheaper...??? Ahh Man...I think I may be getting back into a stang.
|
Its ok nobody is perfect :)
|
That's why I advise that people that want to keep enjoying their Z don't test drive Mustangs.
|
So you figured out that bigger motors tend to make more power? The v6 mustang isn't remotely in the same league as a nismo, don't kid yourself. There is a lot more to performance than "snapping your neck back".
|
Quote:
:stirthepot: |
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... Really? The V6 Stang is as fast as the Nismo? Forget the fact that the V6 tops out at like 117mph it is in no way as fast or faster then any 370. I love CarandDriver but it has been proven that the Nismo they drove around in there Lightning lap was worn out (tires brakes etc) from being a slut for like a million other magazines.
|
Quote:
Dig up a V6 or even a V8 "stang" and let's test this theory at Roebling or Road Atlanta. :icon17: |
Quote:
$35 to remove the rev limited. With it off, the v6 knocks several seconds off the lap time, pushing it well below 3:12. |
i'm going to have to double check which episode it was but on Top Gear UK you catch a glimps of the 370's track time and the Roush 540 time, and IIRC the 370 was about the same around the their track as it was, so i don't think the v6 is going be be quicker then a Nismo on anyones track.
|
A V6 Mustang will not beat a 370z with the SP or a Nismo around a track. It lacks straight line and cornering abilities in objective terms, not to mention a slight disadvantage in weight (with the exception of the Nismo) and it is not like it has a better chassis than the Z either. This isn't fanboism, this is simply what is out there to be gathered from reviews and specs. Down in acceleration, braking, weight, and grip.
Now a 5.OH, that car is mightily impressive in many ways. It is INSANE what simple bolt ons can do for the GT. |
Woahhhh fellas. Not doggin on anything just saying the stang, modern 2011 version, is quite impressive. A 2010 gt forget it. Ford did good with their 5.0. And im not talkin track times. Nismo comes in 350hp 0-60 in 5.3sec 1/4mile in 13.8 those times are the same as the v6 mustang as some people have indicated. The 5.0 comes in at 4.4sec and 12.7. IVE SEEN IT in plenty of reviews and really didnt care when i got my nismo. Just sayin after a test drive....wow.
|
Quote:
You serious? |
Quote:
Quote:
3:12.0 - Nissan NISMO 370Z (2010) 3:12.5 - Ford Mustang V6 (2011) The mustang lost over a second due to the speed limiter. Probably closer to two seconds. |
Quote:
And it will be another replay.. I just pulled on the 2011 camero ss hard in third and he never had a chance.. NISMO FTW... |
Quote:
Wow man. You know what? Get rid of your Z and get a V6 Stang. Seems like thats what you want. I'm not going to sit here and do research to back my claim of the Z being beat to balls by several other mags. This was also the same Nismo I believe pulled off a 0-60 time of like 5.2 seconds and a mid 13 second quarter mile in CarandDriver mag and even they admitted the car was seeing signs a real bad abuse. If you really believe a V6 Stang is faster in any way especially around a track then a Z a car that was designed to be better the some Porches then you sir need to :gtfo2: |
Cool, 1 less Z on the road, and 1 more of the tens of thousands of Mustangs on the road.
Now you can wave at 10-20 Mustangs a day as you pass them throughout your daily routine. There is something to be said for exclusivity, this is why the mustang will always be a fail in my eyes. |
:drama:
When it comes down the Z is a more nimble car where as the stang puts it down on the straights. Now if you are a gearhead you would choose your own poison. Most of us on the forums will go boost hopefully. :tup: |
Quote:
|
This is a forum for everyone and just because some decide to go in another direction? Doesn't make them traitors or any less a good owner or person. I suggest that folks hold off on the name calling and such since it's only going to lead to the thread to be locked. I personally don't mind other brand owners as this is a forum for all enthusiast.
|
:iagree:
|
thats funny, I was just reading an article that about a 2010 Mustang GT Premium vs 2009 370Z. here is the link
2010 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z Comparison Test on Inside Line |
Quote:
Quote:
OP: If Mustangs float your boat, then make the move. One of my boys is looking to get a 5.0 GT and we are usually pretty competitive. Our last rivalry was his '88 5.0 LX vs my '89 CA-powered S13. Should be fun....... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Totally agree. But when people start saying stupud stuff like 117mph V6 Stangs are faster or as fast then a 370Z people get a little mad. |
Quote:
|
There is a little too much fanboyism going on on both sides here.
First, the V6 with the performance package (summer tires, GT suspension) can get very close to the GT's times on certain tracks where speeds don't exceed its limiter, and the GT is faster than the 370Z on most all road courses, so I don't think it's too far fetched to think the sport version of the V6 could be quicker than a NISMO on some tracks. Plus, we all know that outright speed doesn't really matter as the Z would be in limp mode after one lap without an oil cooler ;) :p. Second, if you think the 370Z is "exclusive" you are sadly mistaken. What are the barriers to entry that make it "exclusive?" It's a very inexpensive sports car that anyone can buy. The correct word is rare. There are far fewer 370Zs than there are Mustangs around (~10,000 370Zs sold a year vs. ~30,000 Mustang 5.0s). There's absolutely nothing "exclusive" about a $30k car. Third, everything Trips said is correct. Instead of bashing people for their choice of vehicle, focus on being happy with yours. |
Quote:
Bottom line, buy what you like. The Z is still a fantastic and fast car. The Mustang is simply as fast or faster. There's no shame in that. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The GT-R is their halo car. That's the one that will stick around regardless of whether it makes money, IMO.
I think the Z could go the way or the dodo bird, they could keep it around in it's typical 2-seater configuration, or they could try to reinvent it as a 2+2 to compete better with the other 2+2s on the market. I hope they don't, but it's a definite possibility. Then there's obviously Nissan's green initiative... I could see a hybrid Z or full electric Z in the near future. :/ |
Hopefully Nissan does not throw in the towel on the Z. It is an icon. The have the GT-R, but the Z is pretty much what defines NISSAN. Other than the Maxima and Altima, what is left?
I would be interested to see some of the Mustang owners once I return from "hell", just to get a grip on how great they are as opposed to the lowly Z (sarcasm). Maybe I will go to a Ford dealer and test drive one for giggles............. |
Quote:
It definitely could happen, but it would look bad. |
The problem is I am not sure if Nissan cares about the Z's heritage. They are trying to push a very green lineup so I wouldn't be surprised to see them just use the name to help promote some new lame electric car. :/
|
Quote:
Plus, like I said, with Nissan trying to reinvent itself as a future-looking, green brand, I think any good PR from that would outweigh whatever bad PR castrating the Z might bring. |
Quote:
Still, they're certainly not keeping it around because it's exclusive like the Reventon. The Nissan 370Z does not come with a helicopter delivery option or take prizes at the Concours D'Elegance. lol it weighs down showroom floors :roflpuke2: |
Bottom line is we are a dying breed. Not by our own choice, and we probably haven't seen the peak yet, but I think we're very close to the end of the high-powered, gas slurping cars we love so much. This is why I am a big proponent of enjoying it while we still can instead of fanboy fighting like we tend to do on these forums. ;)
332 hp 3.7L, 412 hp 5.0... we're all going to end up in some 1.8L gas/electric hybrid nanny-mobile. Drive like you stole the god damn thing, fellas. Enjoy it while you still can. ;) |
^^^
I agree with all of that.. I just got a new STi and it gets an awesome 17mpg :shakes head: but im going to drive the hell out of it! |
Quote:
There is obviously still a large enough demand for faster/exciting cars. Mustangs, STI, EVO, Corvettes, CTS-V, Porsche, etc that the exciting cars will not die off. Sure it may be a 2.5 liter with some awesome technology that produces a ton of hp with low gas consumption, or a hybrid that is a torque monster, or even a pure electric that goes like hell. If anything it seems that at some point people started getting more attached to the Big Engine Number vs the actual experience of driving the car. Aka, its a 6.3 liter oh baby yeah vs.. This car is awesome to drive. One thing that will be missed personally though is the sound that the big v8's can make.. I still miss the sound my GTO made. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2