Originally Posted by Kingbaby 3 would be sweet! if you have time send an invoice to 2amrvq@gmail.com to Hawaii lol... I'll just email you instructions on how to make them.
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-15-2013, 09:54 AM | #422 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 2amr.net
Posts: 1,756
Drives: a car I know about..
Rep Power: 19 |
...
__________________
07 Silver Alloy Nissan 350Z Nismo #0191 "Lin'da" 2amR--------------------> VQ I.N.C. - Like us! Quote:
Last edited by Kingbaby; 08-15-2013 at 12:18 PM. |
|
08-18-2013, 11:54 PM | #426 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Put about 80 miles on the Z this weekend with the cage and all.
Wow. All I can say. Cage + Bracing + Harness + New Bars = Holy crap. Can not wait to get the coilovers and some real rubber. |
09-11-2013, 11:42 AM | #427 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Just got back from the dyno touching up my tune.
I picked up 1hp on the top and 4-6 throughout the entire rev range. Here's a comparo of the best old run vs today's final product... notice the curious humps in torque with the FI exhaust vs the OEM Nismo (the only meaningful change in the engine). Keen eyes will notice the large difference in AFR. Let me just say, that the difference in AFR is not where the power difference came from. When the car was at Uprev being tuned (by the guy who created Uprev) there were zero (0) gains in going from the low 12's to the 13's on the car. We ran the AFR up to almost 14:1 and saw zero change in the power delivery, just higher coolant and oil temps. Knowing that (at the time) the cooling system in the car was woefully inadequate, we decided to keep it rich and call it a day. Now with different parts and a larger radiator (to put it mildly) the AFR naturally ran up higher (and I boosted it a bit as well) and we see the gains we have here. To qualify that a little, look at the chart where the two traces nearly intersect, note the large gap in AFR? If it were just running leaner making the difference, one power curve would be higher than the other... this isn't the case. Anyway, I think I'm running into some kind of flow limit. I'm not sure which part is causing the limit.. I hope it isn't the headers (collectors, really) but I suspect it may be. You can see how changing the exhaust really let them honk up at 6k+ but then they fall back on their *** right away. If I can figure out what is slowing the system down above 7k, I think I could get some pretty insane numbers. We'll see, for now, the car is much happier feeling and I'm satisfied with where I'm at (especially since I tuned it myself and only had to pay for an hour's dyno time).
( Click to show/hide )
Last edited by Sh0velMan; 10-04-2013 at 04:48 PM. |
09-11-2013, 12:32 PM | #428 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,156
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 24 |
Quote:
I dont know what is the diameter of those Nismo Intake but you might want to look into a bigger TB and intake tubbing if they are too small. If you remember, I mentionned all of this in my thread and at both occasion where I tested back to back , there was gain of 7-9whp with a bigger TB & CAI & Maf Tube. |
|
09-11-2013, 01:29 PM | #429 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,051
Drives: 2013 Silver 370z
Rep Power: 3389 |
Does it matter where the main hoop is mounted? Like 2-3" further back or forward? Mind taking close ups of the other mounting locations?
Have you weighed your car yet?
__________________
13 370z- Last edited by synolimit; 09-11-2013 at 01:36 PM. |
09-11-2013, 02:35 PM | #430 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
The "cut" so to speak, is between 6200 and 6400 RPM. This corresponds with the point at which the MAF flow #'s clip. Basically it hits like 266 G/Sec and stops. (I think it's 266, it's been too long since I looked at it, I need to start logging that stat now I guess) Problem is, I don't know how that reading possibly affects anything when the MAF Volts continue to climb/index on the table. I may need to send some data to a pro tuner and see what they think might be happening... if the lump at the end there extended from 6100RPM and then rolled off closer to redline, I think we would see much more impressive top end numbers. It seems aborted, the way it is right now. |
|
09-11-2013, 03:36 PM | #431 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,051
Drives: 2013 Silver 370z
Rep Power: 3389 |
Quote:
__________________
13 370z- |
|
09-11-2013, 03:43 PM | #432 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
There's a dynamic around that area that I don't understand, and I honestly don't know if any of the tuners really understand it either, because I'm pretty sure it all revolves around VVEL. I didn't log VVEL position (You always think of these things afterwards, not while you're sitting in the car sweating) so I can't try and correlate any of it to that. Maybe a pro tuner can help me figure it out... It may be as simple as a plumbing issue though. Definitely looks like there is a specific flow limit it reaches and from there on, it's down hill. It happens later in the rev range on the old exhaust/tune than it does now, but it's the same limit. |
|
09-11-2013, 04:41 PM | #433 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,156
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 24 |
Quote:
the 266G/sec is the max number on the Uprev table. the way it was explained to me in the beginning was that as long as you can give fuel with the MAF Table the G/sec is kind of useless this is a copy/paste of one of my concern on this topic with Jared @ Uprev I don't think I've ever seen the g/sec go down while the V was rising, but I honestly don't usually look at the g/sec since that parameter becomes totally meaningless once you change the K fuel multiplier for a different MAF or injectors. Last edited by Megan370z; 09-11-2013 at 04:43 PM. |
|
09-11-2013, 04:44 PM | #434 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
Yeah I need to start logging manifold pressure, sounds like. |
|
09-11-2013, 04:49 PM | #435 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,156
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 24 |
Quote:
it will be better with an actual gauge that can read vacuum properly. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wh1te370z - BMW 328is Track Car Build | wh1te370z | Other Vehicles | 25 | 03-22-2012 11:21 AM |
United touge/track drivers Streets of Willow Track Day | K.R.O.P.S. | Southern California Region | 0 | 10-05-2011 08:25 PM |
Forged Performance: R35 GT-R Track Day Build | ChadB@Forged | Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip | 2 | 06-10-2011 10:40 PM |
Datsun Roadster 1600...To build or not to build | motoextreme | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 66 | 02-13-2010 01:40 AM |