![]() |
Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks The loophole is that they can state that the car is a continuation of an existing or previous road going model, doesn't seem to matter how
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 382
Drives: 09 370z PG M6
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
![]()
The loophole if i understand correctly was that the car had to be production READY, in which it is. Apparently nowhere in the rules does it say the car actually has to be in production.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DannyGT's Journal/Progress | DannyGT | Member's 370Z Gallery | 174 | 10-17-2017 10:25 AM |
RCZ's 370Z Journal. | RCZ | Member's 370Z Gallery | 1743 | 08-09-2013 11:55 PM |
Edmonton Journal Review of the 370Z | BanningZ | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 13 | 08-09-2009 05:44 PM |