Awesome, thanks for the pics. It looks like a great size, and the price seems like a pretty good deal.
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-17-2010, 07:58 PM | #467 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 4,391
Drives: your mom to church
Rep Power: 296 |
Quote:
Kel-Tec P-3AT .380 pistol blue for Sale at Buds Gun Shop $272.00
__________________
2011 Mustang 5.0 | 3.55's | Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe | Magnaflow Muffler Delete | JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs |
|
04-17-2010, 08:03 PM | #468 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: utah
Posts: 781
Drives: my z every day
Rep Power: 17 |
^I have the .32 Kel-Tec, these things are crazy small. Wouldn't recommend the .32 for carry tho - get the .380 for sure.
__________________
my journal | 2009 370z touring | 6mt | platinum graphite | my album
second skin | mr works | fast intentions | ssr | eibach | hotchkis | spc | toyo | bluebatmobile | v-led | jwt | ventureshield | tinted tails |
04-17-2010, 08:33 PM | #470 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 4,391
Drives: your mom to church
Rep Power: 296 |
as with double action only pistols, the reset is always going to be long. The trigger on it actually acts as a safety mechanism, being that there isnt a safety switch. The pull is long so as to not accidentally go off when youre carrying with a round in the tube. This isnt a once a week range gun, its for self defense and self defense alone.
__________________
2011 Mustang 5.0 | 3.55's | Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe | Magnaflow Muffler Delete | JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs |
04-17-2010, 08:34 PM | #471 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 4,391
Drives: your mom to church
Rep Power: 296 |
__________________
2011 Mustang 5.0 | 3.55's | Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe | Magnaflow Muffler Delete | JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs |
04-17-2010, 08:37 PM | #472 (permalink) | ||
Retired admin
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-17-2010, 08:45 PM | #473 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany
Posts: 4,391
Drives: your mom to church
Rep Power: 296 |
__________________
2011 Mustang 5.0 | 3.55's | Lethal Performance off road H-Pipe | Magnaflow Muffler Delete | JLT CAI/Bama tuned 417whp/ 404 ft/lbs |
04-22-2010, 11:35 PM | #474 (permalink) |
Retired admin
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0 |
State plan fines feds $2,000 over gun rules
2 years in jail also possible for agent enforcing U.S. regulations on firearm Wyoming has joined a growing list of states with self-declared exemptions from federal gun regulation of weapons made, bought and used inside state borders – but lawmakers in the Cowboy State have taken the issue one step further, adopting significant penalties for federal agents attempting to enforce Washington’s rules. According to a law signed into effect yesterday by Democratic Gov. Dave Freudenthal, any agent of the U.S. who “enforces or attempts to enforce” federal gun rules on a “personal firearm” in Wyoming faces a felony conviction and a penalty of up to two years in prison and up to $2,000 in fines. WND reported just days ago when Utah became the third state, joining Montana and Tennessee, to adopt an exemption from federal regulations for weapons built, sold and kept within state borders. A lawsuit is pending over the Montana law, which was the first to go into effect. But Wyoming’s law goes further, stating, “Any official, agent or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be subject to imprisonment for not more than two (2) years, a fine of not more than two thousand dollars ($2,000.00), or both.” Gary Marbut of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, who has spearheaded the Montana law, now describes himself as a sort of “godfather” to the national campaign. He said the issue is not only about guns but about states’ rights and the constant overreaching by federal agencies and Washington to impose their requirements on in-state activities. He said South Dakota, Oklahoma, Alaska and Idaho also appear to be close to adopting similar legislation, and several dozen more states have proposals in the works. According to an analysis by Michael Boldin at the Tenth Amendment Center, the federal government has used the Commerce Clause, which authorizes the regulation of commerce that crosses state lines, to regulate just about anything. In the Montana lawsuit, the federal government’s brief argues it can regulate intrastate commerce because of the Commerce Clause. But the analysis said what the states are doing is simply a nullification. “Laws of the federal government are to be supreme in all matters pursuant to the delegated powers of U.S. Constitution. When D.C. enacts laws outside those powers, state laws trump. And, as Thomas Jefferson would say, when the federal government assumes powers not delegated to it, those acts are ‘unauthoritative, void, and of no force’ from the outset,” Boldin wrote. “When a state ‘nullifies’ a federal law, it is proclaiming that the law in question is void and inoperative, or ‘noneffective,’ within the boundaries of that state; or, in other words, not a law as far as the state is concerned. Implied in such legislation is that the state apparatus will enforce the act against all violations – in order to protect the liberty of the state’s citizens,” he continued. “By signing H.B. 95, Gov. Freudenthal places Wyoming in a position of proper authority while pressing the issue of state supremacy back into the public sphere,” he continued. On a blog, one commentator noted, “This is a healthy sign. Legislators in several states working to take back sovereignty and restore constitutional government. The next step that has to be taken is to replace representatives and senators who don’t support states rights. Then, the House needs to introduce impeachment proceedings against Supreme Court justices who exhibit bad behavior. Contrary to popular belief, Supreme Court justices do not serve lifetime appointments. They serve for periods of GOOD BEHAVIOR. I contend that erroneous decisions constitute bad behavior.” Learn what you can do about your nation. Get “Taking America Back,” Joseph Farah’s manifesto for sovereignty, self-reliance and moral renewal According to the Casper, Wyo., Star-Tribune, the law takes effect in July and consumers could purchase guns immediately under the exemption from the state’s sole firearms manufacturer, Freedom Arms, which makes revolvers in the $2,000 price range. The newspaper reported authorities already have discussed the possible scenario of a local Wyoming sheriff arresting a U.S. marshal. “That’s a question we’ve sort of asked ourselves,” John Powell, a spokesman with the U.S. attorney’s office in Cheyenne, told the paper. “We’re not exactly sure how this is going to play out.” State Rep. Alan Jaggi, R-Lyman, told the newspaper there could be confrontations. “I think it could be a possibility if we had some overzealous – do I want to say bureaucrat? – that would just say, ‘Hey, we’re going to show these states we have all the authority,’” Jaggi said. “States’ rights – I’m willing to say that’s important enough to us to do it.” In signing Utah’s law, Gov. Gary Herbert said it was time to act. “There are times when the state needs to push back against continued encroachment from the federal government. Sending the message that we will stand up for a proper balance between the state and federal government is a good thing,” said Herbert in a statement. The Montana lawsuit was filed by state officials against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and others seeking a court order that the federal government stay out of the way of Montana’s management of its own firearms within state borders. In a subsequent filing, the federal government demanded dismissal of the action, explaining it can regulate in-state commerce under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. As WND reported, the action was filed by the Second Amendment Foundation and the Montana Shooting Sports Association in U.S. District Court in Missoula, Mont., to validate the principles and terms of the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, which took effect Oct. 3. Marbut argues that the federal government was created by the states to serve the states and the people, and it is time for the states to begin drawing boundaries for the federal government and its agencies. The government’s filing in the case demands its dismissal, citing a lacking of “standing” for the plaintiffs and the court’s lack of “jurisdiction,” as well as the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. The government filing argues, “The Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit have repeatedly held that even purely intrastate activities, such as those the MFFA purports to exempt from federal law, do affectinterstate commerce and thus are within Congress’ power to regulate. As a result, even if plaintiffs had standing and jurisdiction existed, plaintiffs’ amended complaint fails to state a claim and must be dismissed.” The Commerce Clause, however, can be interpreted to have been amended by the 10th Amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, adopted subsequent to the U.S. Constitution, Marbut explains. His organization said, “The Commerce Clause was amended – by the 10th Amendment. It is a bedrock principle of jurisprudence that for any conflict between provisions of a coequal body of law, the most recently enacted must be given deference as the most recent expression of the enacting authority. This principle is ancient. Without this principle, laws could not be amended or repealed.” For example, U.S. courts repeatedly affirmed slavery before it ultimately was rejected. There’s no question that the components of the Bill of Rights have authority: just look at the First Amendment, Marbut explained. The federal government had written gun dealers in Montana as well as in Tennessee when it adopted its own version of the same law that warned against following the state laws. The letters were distributed to holders of federal firearms licenses. In the Tennessee case, Carson W. Carroll, the assistant director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, told dealers the adopted Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act “purports to exempt personal firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition manufactured in the state, and which remain in the state, from most federal firearms laws and regulations.” The exemption is not right, the federal agency letter contends. Full story found here at State plan fines feds $2,000 over gun rules |
04-22-2010, 11:49 PM | #475 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Arrakis
Posts: 7,952
Drives: giant sandworm
Rep Power: 36 |
lol @ states trying to flex their muscle.
__________________
"Once you go Asian, you never go Caucasian." "I talk to myself, and when I do that, I know I'm talking to an intelligent person." |
04-23-2010, 02:04 AM | #476 (permalink) | |
Grand Prix of Endurance
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,476
Drives: Mulsanne Straight
Rep Power: 26 |
Quote:
All it took was 1, to get the wheel rolling!
__________________
We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary. |
|
04-24-2010, 12:33 PM | #478 (permalink) |
Retired admin
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 106,613
Drives: Your Wife Crazy
Rep Power: 0 |
If Guns were Treated Like Cars
(C) 2000 Ron Miller 1. You could get a simple license from the State for a nominal fee and only have to take a test that any idiot could pass. You'd only have to renew it every 10 years for 40 years and maybe retake the test if you move out of state. 2. You could kill and injure people with your gun while drunk and still have your lawyer get your gun back because you need it for work. 3. You'd have half the tax burden of the county and State dedicated to improving the shooting ranges and facilities. The public agrees this is never good enough to suit them and with all the gunowners from California moving in, the range capacity will never catch up. Lines at the range are always shown on TV with the newsies deploring the crowding. 4. You could carry in any State at any time because carry and possession of your gun is honored nationwide and is considered a basic American civil right. 5. You would see commercials on TV pushing the newest, latest guns which you could lease for just $25 per month subject to the fine print. 6. You could finance a fancier gun than you can really afford by taking a 5 year loan with approved credit. 7. You would have a gun safe built into every house. In the upscale houses you would have 3 gun safes. Inexpensive houses and mobile homes would just have a gunrack by the door. 8. You'd have gun storage lockers at the shopping mall in which to store your rifle while shopping. This in order to free your arms for packages. The convenience of the shopper is paramount. 9. You could buy ammunition at the 7-11. Full-service station means they'll reload your magazines for you. 10 The news would stop reporting gun accidents unless more than 10 children were killed at one time. Onesy-twosey would only be notable in small towns or if Princess Di's bodyguard shot her while aiming at paparazzi. 11 If the price of ammunition rose 20% the Federal Government would release war reserves of ammo to bring the price back down to the consumer's comfort level. Ammo would carry a 50% tax to finance public shooting ranges. The Teapot Dome scandal would have been about a lead mine. 12 We'd teach gunsmithing in vocational-education programs. 13 Every 16 year old would be looking forward to the day when he could take the family revolver to school. The rich kids would get a high capacity semi-auto pistol on their 16th birthday and endanger everyone when they learn to use it in public. 14 High schools would have large gun lockers to store student's arms while they attend classes. Administrators would try to charge for the service to discourage teen-age gun carrying to school. 15 Schools would have shooter's education classes to make sure the kids could pass the test. They would show gory films of gunshot wounds. The squeamish would throw up. 16 Old people who can hardly see would still be permitted to shoot in public because to disarm them would be to damage their self-esteem. Families would wring their hands over holes in the walls and ceiling. Occasionally an oldster would fire into a schoolyard when they mistake the trigger for the safety. Legislators would refrain from criticizing because of the AARP's influence. 17 Congress would be debating alternative weapons systems for people who can't afford their own guns. 18 There would be such a thing as "public weapons" for the masses. 19 Congress would be subsidizing weapons for people too limited in means to afford their own. 20 Congress would be willing to float a loan to Colt's in order to ensure the survival of an American company against unfair foreign competition. (Think "Chrysler") 21 We, except for Ralph Nader, would dismiss 40,000 deaths and 500,000 injuries per year as "the price of freedom." 22 You would have MADS. Mothers Against Drunk Shooters (instead of HCI). MADS would conduct a campaign of public education instead of trying to use the force of government to prohibit irresponsible drinking and shooting. 23 You could rent a gun at any airport if you are over 25 and have a credit card. 24 You would have the fringe-greenies advocating bows and arrows because they think gunsmoke is damaging the environment. Al Gore would write a book about the damaging effects of gunsmoke. Al Gore would also claim to have been a handloader before his sister died in a powder fire. 25 You'd have huge outcry in the Press and Congress over our dependence on cheap, imported, foreign ammunition. 26 Ted Kennedy would have shot Mary Jo Kopekne instead. Ted would be a few thousand dollars richer (bullet:$0.25 vs car:$3000) Ted would stop carrying his own gun and instead, hire bodyguards to carry fully-automatic weapons under their coats for him. 27 You'd have businesses like "Jiffy Gun-Clean" to make life convenient. But you'd always worry that they might not have gotten the magazine fully seated afterwards. 28 You'd have "Classic Gun Events" with parades on public roads as everyone with such a classic carries it for all the public to see. 29 You'd have huge eyesores where piles of guns are left to rust in the open at "Gun Junk Yards". They would charge you outrageous prices to go out back and pick off a hammer or sear which is probably also worn out like the one you want to replace. 30 There would be a booming business and debate about substituting non-OEM parts in the gun repair business. 31 You'd have TV news crews going under cover with hidden cameras to ferret out "unscrupulous gun smiths." This story would be "old reliable" and works every year. 32 The Japanese would be trying, and succeeding, at taking over the market for efficient, reliable high-quality guns. The Koreans would be trying to sneak in at the low end of the market. The Germans would be selling premium brands based on better workmanship, longer life, and brand cachet. But their guns would require you to take it to a gunsmith every 3 months for a complete tear-down and dimensional inspection at outrageous labor rates. The Italians would paint their guns flaming red and they would have a reputation for being finicky. The State Department would be applying pressure to get Japan to allow more US-built guns into their country. The Japanese would resist the US by saying that Japanese shooters have extra-special safety requirements that only Japanese manufacturers can meet. 33 You'd have an entire section of the Saturday Coloradoan devoted to ads for new and used guns. 34 You'd have a pair of fun-loving gunsmiths on Public Radio doing a show on gun problems. They'd be named "Tap & Rack" 35 There would have been a terrible TV show back in the black & white days named "My Mother - The Gun". It starred Jerry Van Dyke and ran just one season. 36 Dean Jones would have made a series of stupid movies starring Herbie the Love-Gun. Herbie was an adorable anthropomorphized cheap German Saturday Night Special. Dean Jones would never show his face in public again after these movies. 37 Competition would be carried on TV all day on Saturdays. The Daytona 500 would be round-count instead of miles. There would be speed contests, endurance contests, and off-range marksmanship events. NASGUN would create big heroes in the South and extravagant marketing opportunities. 38 High-schools would paint up a gun in the colors of the opposition and charge $.25 for you to swing a sledge hammer at that gun during pep rallys. 39 John Elway would own half the gunstores in the Denver Metro area. 40 Wellington Webb's wife would be carrying the finest English Double shotgun money can buy while Wellington has body guards to carry his semi-auto pistols 41 Back in the 1970's during the ammo crisis, Congress would have set a maximum cyclic rate for autos and semi autos in order to conserve ammo. 42 After Iraq was pushed out of Kuwait, the national cyclic rate was raised to something all semi-autos can be comfortable with. 43 The Coloradoan would be publishing the locations of range repair work every week to be sure no one would be inconvenienced. 44 The Beach Boys would have released some songs about guns: "Spring little Cobray gettin' ready to strike..... Spring little Cobray with all your might....." "She's real fine my Wonder Nine, she's real fine my Won-der Nine." "Fun, fun, fun 'til Daddy takes her Kel-Tec away......" 45 Letters to editors would be written decrying that all those Soccer Moms are lugging .50 cal machine guns around town, wasting ammo and getting in everybody's way. 46 Letters to editors would be written responding that putting one's beginning driver son or daughter behind a .50 cal would mean that the writer's offspring would survive any conflict with lesser armed individuals. 47 Al Gore would claim he invented the .50cal cartridge and say he was sorry. 48 Cities would be experimenting with electric guns but would be surprised to find that people would step in front of them at the range because they were too quiet so no one knew the electric gun was there. 49 President Clinton would demand that electric gun manufacturers put a cowbell on each one to prevent senseless accidents. 50 The National Rifle Association would be reduced to selling travel insurance for your guns because the rest of society will have seen to it that there would be no chance that firearms would ever be banned. |
04-24-2010, 01:24 PM | #479 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gold Coast CT
Posts: 10,599
Drives: 2019 Corvette G.S.
Rep Power: 43 |
x2, that didn't go over very well in 1860 and the seditious traitors were pounded into total submission by the Patriots.
__________________
SOLD MY Z MARCH 2018 - another Core OG moves on - new ride 2019 Z Corvette Grand Sport - no mods necessary but already have eyes on HFC and intakes LOL IT NEVER ENDS. |
Bookmarks |
|
|