Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   From HFC to test pipes (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/75369-hfc-test-pipes.html)

Eighties Meta 08-15-2013 08:12 PM

From HFC to test pipes
 
Since next dyno will be adding additional parts along with going from HFC to test pipes does anyone know on average the hp/tq gain from hfc to test pipes? I assume fairly small?

Thanks
Kevron

Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2

roy'sz 08-15-2013 08:23 PM

I think you loose a little tq but gain in hp. That was the decision on my build.

1cleanZ 09-23-2013 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roy'sz (Post 2447990)
I think you loose a little tq but gain in hp. That was the decision on my build.

Do we know this for sure? This literally is the Q & A I'm looking for.

Trying to decide between Resonated TPs or Resonated HFCs

roy'sz 09-23-2013 11:13 AM

ARK test pipes up to 10hp and 9tq, up to 9hp and 12tq on resonated hfc's.

1cleanZ 09-23-2013 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roy'sz (Post 2500666)
ARK test pipes up to 10hp and 9tq, up to 9hp and 12tq on resonated hfc's.

hmm....That's interesting. I'm curious what differences it would make with say a Gen3 intake, giving it more breathing mods.

TPs, being more wide open, I would think it would gain more HP then just 1 doing TPs over HFCs?

Any other thoughts/dynos/results around this? My setup will be fully Fast Intentions, which my build date is coming up soon.

roy'sz 09-23-2013 11:55 AM

I would say my gain is about 30hp after hfc's, catback, gen 3's and m370 manifold. I have similar exhaust as what you are getting

You get more hp with test pipes but more tq with hfc's because of the slight restriction in flow.

Leuz 09-23-2013 12:03 PM

Around +25whp with my setup. See signature.

1cleanZ 09-23-2013 12:15 PM

Dang it, you guys definitely aren't making the decision any easier....

Even looking at the dyno charts, I might stick w/ my order of RHFCs and just do a non-resonated catback. The only hesitation on my decision was trying to get as much power as I possibly can NA. I almost feel like the TQ #'s would be more usuable power throughout the powerban. Hmmm....

Fast Intentions Resonated HFCS paired with a NONresonated Xpipe
or
Fast Intentions Resonated TPs paired with an 18" resonator in the Xpipe

Tazicon 09-23-2013 12:32 PM

You probably won't notice a differance either way you go...........Why is this such a hard decision? I would be looking at cost effectiveness not a gain of 2hp.......or 3foot pounds of torque. Plus if I had a choice I would take torque over horse power any day. That makes it an easy decision.

1cleanZ 09-23-2013 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tazicon (Post 2500848)
You probably won't notice a differance either way you go...........Why is this such a hard decision? I would be looking at cost effectiveness not a gain of 2hp.......or 3foot pounds of torque. Plus if I had a choice I would take torque over horse power any day. That makes it an easy decision.

These are things I don't understand sometimes. We purchase 30-40k cars, and then try and save $1-200 on a $2k setup and sacrafice hp/tq? :shakes head:


Not looking at the cost, looking 100% at:

#1 Gains (HP/TQ)
#2 Sound

Leuz 09-23-2013 02:19 PM

OP, when I ordered my HCF + CBE setup I started having your same doubts. Should I need to go with ART pipes or stay with HFC. I spent a month looking at videos, posts and specs and decided to stay with HFC for the following reasons:
- it's my DD and I prefer HFC over TP (mostly afraid of the smell)
- I wanted to go with the same manufacturer to couple HFC+CBE (as someone mentioned already)
Hope this helps making up you your mind. :tup:

BOLIO 671 09-24-2013 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1cleanZ (Post 2500795)
Dang it, you guys definitely aren't making the decision any easier....

Even looking at the dyno charts, I might stick w/ my order of RHFCs and just do a non-resonated catback. The only hesitation on my decision was trying to get as much power as I possibly can NA. I almost feel like the TQ #'s would be more usuable power throughout the powerban. Hmmm....

Fast Intentions Resonated HFCS paired with a NONresonated Xpipe
or
Fast Intentions Resonated TPs paired with an 18" resonator in the Xpipe

As per FI...resonators make no difference on HP/Power gains...The resonators only have an effect on the cabin noise/sound....the bigger the resonator the quieter it is...keep in mind that the 18" Resonated CBE is still louder than stock...FI offers a more deeper tone...Going with TP's will give u rasp/hissing noise and give the exhaust a higher pitched sound compared to running HFC's.

TP's will give u more HP but seen mostly on the top...ending up with u losing torque in the low to midrange area...I personally think that HFC's are the best way to go....I mean how often are u gonna be running ur Z on the top end? And honestly would u be running it at high rpms for long durations?

1cleanZ 09-24-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BOLIO 671 (Post 2503018)
As per FI...resonators make no difference on HP/Power gains...The resonators only have an effect on the cabin noise/sound....the bigger the resonator the quieter it is...keep in mind that the 18" Resonated CBE is still lounder than stock...FI offers a more deeer tone...Going with TP's will give u rasp/hissing noise and give the exhaust a higher pitched sound compared to running HFC's.

TP's will give u more HP but seen mostly on the top...ending up with u losing torque in the low to midrange area...I personally think that HFC's are the best way to go....I mean how often are u gonna be running ur Z on the top end? And honestly would u be running it at high rpms for long durations?

Yes, I 100% already know about the products themselves from Fast Intentions, I'm not asking about resonators. I ran RHFCs paired with an 18" resonators in the xpipe on my G37 for over 2 years. I'm very familiar with the products themselves.

I'm strictly asking TP's vs HFCs, benefits vs cons.

And no, test pipes will actually give you a lower, deeper tone, not higher. Yes they may create a bit of rasp, but that's the intent of having resonators in both the TP as well as the Xpipe IF going w/ that setup.

Thanks though. The TQ factor I'm definitely taking into consideration right now. I felt immediate gains on my G37 when installing the RHFCs, even after already having the catback previously over a year.

roy'sz 09-24-2013 07:25 PM

To answer your question for the 3rd time in this thread. More hp with testpipe or more tq with hfc.

Hotrodz 09-24-2013 07:46 PM

I guess I will add my two cents to the conversation as I am in agreement with Roy. I have a similar setup as the OP except I don't have an after market CAI. When considering all the options and not spending money where I didn't need too, I put my money into ART Pipes and M370 Manifold. I chased tq since the hp gains are not really usable unless running at the top end. If you look at others signature lines or treads they may get another 10whp but they will have almost that same number less in tq. Anyway, it really is about what makes you happy...that's why I decide to go FI and I'm sure there will be something else to want after that! LOL


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2