AMUSE 370z puts down 403 hp 342tq

Jordo! · 04-27-2013, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RSZED

Dynapack are the most acurate of dynos compared to mustang dynos that aren't relatively accurate. since dynapacks are connected to the wheel hubs and not rollling on a roller.

Accuracy in terms of repeatability can be gotten on any dyno -- HOWEVER, there tends to be greater variability from shop to shop (i.e., dynamometer unit to unit of same brand) in dynapacks, mustangs, and other load holding dynos, which tend to have a great deal of variation in calibration parameters.

I personally prefer dynojets simply because the degree of variance from unit to unit is negligible. It just calculates speed of rotations of the known and constant weight of the drum (roller) and then interpolates torque.

That means (transient factors, such as ambient heat and humidity not well accounted for by correction factors, notwithstanding) a dynojet reading from one part of the world is much more comparable to findings from any other dynojet anywhere in the world, whereas the same is not found to be true for most other dynos, all of which may be calibrated a bit differently.

deuce189 · 04-28-2013, 03:57 PM

I'd be pretty happy with 400 crank hp on a NA bolt on Z. These things react to mods equivalent to a V8. Exhaust, intake, and tune... boom. That will hold me over until the decision to go FI.

6MT-Z34 · 02-25-2014, 07:34 PM

I know this is an old thread but I saw this video on their Facebook page:https://m.facebook.com/powerhouseamuse
It says it puts down 400ps with just an exhaust and their hi-tech ROM

How legit u think this is?

KaienZ34 · 02-25-2014, 07:40 PM

Not at all.....

Riptide67 · 02-25-2014, 07:56 PM

Seems legit.....

Eclipz · 02-25-2014, 08:52 PM

Its probably power at the crank, not the wheels. Makes more sense that way. Plus its Dynapack

BTW I think my headphones are broken from listening to that video...

Sh0velMan · 02-25-2014, 09:46 PM

Not even crank HP with exhaust and tune only. Total bullshmidt.

edub370 · 02-26-2014, 09:01 AM

400 crank hp = 352whp with 12% drivetrain loss. no way is that car making 352 with just exhaust and tune. i think the highest NA on this forum was 342 and that was with a lot more than that

Minato · 02-26-2014, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edub370

400 crank hp = 352whp with 12% drivetrain loss. no way is that car making 352 with just exhaust and tune. i think the highest NA on this forum was 342 and that was with a lot more than that

where are you getting only a 12% drivetrain loss? That seems awfully generous. Looking at stock dynos drivetrain loss seems more like ~18%

synolimit · 02-26-2014, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edub370

400 crank hp = 352whp with 12% drivetrain loss. no way is that car making 352 with just exhaust and tune. i think the highest NA on this forum was 342 and that was with a lot more than that

Wouldn't the loss be more like 18%? 332 chp stock but we normally put down low 270's. So 400chp would be 328whp. 328 is more likely.

A lot more parts but also incorrect correction factor. That 342 is more like 328 if you want to get technical.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minato

where are you getting only a 12% drivetrain loss? That seems awfully generous. Looking at stock dynos drivetrain loss seems more like ~18%

Lol beat me to it.

edub370 · 02-27-2014, 12:57 PM

lol hey i'm trying to help them justify that 400 number.

so 18% loss then.

400 crank hp = 328whp... idk this number might be attainable with those mods and a generous dyno.

Minato · 02-27-2014, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edub370

lol hey i'm trying to help them justify that 400 number.

so 18% loss then.

400 crank hp = 328whp... idk this number might be attainable with those mods and a generous dyno.

hey you got 398 crank hp then lol

synolimit · 03-01-2014, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edub370

lol hey i'm trying to help them justify that 400 number.

so 18% loss then.

400 crank hp = 328whp... idk this number might be attainable with those mods and a generous dyno.

Someone just reminded me about something. You might be right on the 12% loss. We only assume 18% because everyone dyno's in 4th which is the wrong gear. If everyone did 5th the stock numbers would be higher since its a 1:1 gear and 12% would be right since you'd probably put down around 280-290 stock.

04-28-2013, 03:57 PM	#32 (permalink)
deuce189 Base Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Charleston, SC Posts: 142 Drives: 09 370Z MB M6 sport Rep Power: 14	I'd be pretty happy with 400 crank hp on a NA bolt on Z. These things react to mods equivalent to a V8. Exhaust, intake, and tune... boom. That will hold me over until the decision to go FI. __________________ 2K9 MB M6 Sport Touring \| Stillen lip \| Motordyne CB \| Swift spec-R \| Up-Rev Tune

02-25-2014, 07:40 PM	#34 (permalink)
KaienZ34 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: LA. not L.a. Posts: 21,652 Drives: Z34 Tour/Sport Rep Power: 178	Not at all..... Megan370z, edub370, FPenvy and 2 others like this. __________________ *"These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends"* http://www.the370z.com/members/kaienz34-albums-z34.html

02-25-2014, 07:56 PM	#35 (permalink)
Riptide67 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Oak Harbor, WA Age: 37 Posts: 1,610 Drives: 09 Nismo #0483 PW Rep Power: 69	Seems legit..... __________________ 2009 Nismo 370Z and 1975 Datsun 280Z 2+2 - PNW_INC - Legacy_Ohana Follow me on Instagam @s3zero_z3four

02-25-2014, 08:52 PM	#36 (permalink)
Eclipz Enthusiast Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Tampa Posts: 360 Drives: 06 Eclipse GS Rep Power: 12	Its probably power at the crank, not the wheels. Makes more sense that way. Plus its Dynapack BTW I think my headphones are broken from listening to that video... Last edited by Eclipz; 02-25-2014 at 08:54 PM.

02-25-2014, 09:46 PM	#37 (permalink)
Sh0velMan A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth Posts: 3,349 Drives: Noisily. Rep Power: 20	Not even crank HP with exhaust and tune only. Total bullshmidt. Riptide67 likes this. __________________ Buy My Car! \| Build Thread

02-25-2014, 07:34 PM	#33 (permalink)
6MT-Z34 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: NJ Posts: 1,726 Drives: PW Z Rep Power: 15	I know this is an old thread but I saw this video on their Facebook page:https://m.facebook.com/powerhouseamuse It says it puts down 400ps with just an exhaust and their hi-tech ROM How legit u think this is?

02-26-2014, 09:01 AM	#38 (permalink)
edub370 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2011 Location: KCMO Posts: 3,458 Drives: 09 370z S/T 6MT Rep Power: 20	400 crank hp = 352whp with 12% drivetrain loss. no way is that car making 352 with just exhaust and tune. i think the highest NA on this forum was 342 and that was with a lot more than that __________________ 09 370Z ST 6MT//Injen CAI//Greddy CBE//TP//TSW's//Swifts//Stillen lip//Whiteline sways 326whp/268tq

02-27-2014, 12:57 PM	#41 (permalink)
edub370 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2011 Location: KCMO Posts: 3,458 Drives: 09 370z S/T 6MT Rep Power: 20	lol hey i'm trying to help them justify that 400 number. so 18% loss then. 400 crank hp = 328whp... idk this number might be attainable with those mods and a generous dyno. __________________ 09 370Z ST 6MT//Injen CAI//Greddy CBE//TP//TSW's//Swifts//Stillen lip//Whiteline sways 326whp/268tq

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Now That's Just COLD! Girl Puts Up Her GIFT (Nissan 370Z Roadster) For Sale	DeLRo	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	51	01-26-2011 11:22 PM
crazy drift, puts car in reverse	Jeffblue	Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip	31	01-07-2011 09:35 PM
How does Nissan puts a Turbo....	PapoZalsa	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	31	10-21-2010 08:52 PM
Amuse Autobac testing new Amuse exhaust on 370Z 01.21.09	AK370Z	Intake/Exhaust	8	06-22-2010 09:28 AM
Powerhouse Amuse RS Silent Exhaust with Amuse Cats & Amuse Front Pipe	abgyak	Intake/Exhaust	3	04-14-2010 05:43 AM