Originally Posted by Phimosis Don't mean to be argumentative, but 108 trap seemed way too fast for a Z, so I googled MT and 370z and I see 13.3 @
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-16-2009, 10:28 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
2009 Nissan 370Z Automatic - Short Take Road Test - Auto Reviews - Car and Driver
__________________
Last edited by SnakeBitten; 07-16-2009 at 10:39 AM. |
|
07-16-2009, 10:55 AM | #17 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594 |
A bone stock 370 straight off the showroom floor, of either transmission type, isn't going to hit 12's even in ideal circumstances. I find the C/D numbers questionable honestly. My runs were 13.4xx in the 7AT, and that was with bolt-on power mods (Gen 3 intake, headers, HFCs, CBE) at a DA of ~1500, on a really good track (Houston Raceway Park). Granted, I had some extra junk in the car (large bag of tools, etc) and didn't mess with my tire pressures, but still ...
|
07-16-2009, 11:10 AM | #18 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 16 |
Soo you got two tests. One with manual and the other with auto and both are low 13's at over 107 mph, on a typical unprepped non 1/4 track surface, and you still dont think this car has a probable 12.9 in it on a prepped track? All it has to do is knock out a good 60' time. 108-110 mph can be enough to hit a 12.9 if you kill the 60'. It may take one hell of a launch but its at least "possible" imho. But until its done cant really disregard what you have said either. I guess time will ultimately tell.
BTW you have Sport/Touring and auto. Maybe that little extra weight cost you a few 10ths? Maybe? Car in this test I believe only had the sport package I believe and I have no idea what the da was where they ran.
__________________
Last edited by SnakeBitten; 07-16-2009 at 11:19 AM. |
07-16-2009, 11:19 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594 |
Quote:
|
|
07-16-2009, 11:27 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Midwood
Posts: 232
Drives: 05 DBZ M6
Rep Power: 16 |
You may be right Ive heard one of them uses some form of correction factor. Not sure on the particulars of that other than it sounds liek they make up numbers based on variables instead of cold hard test numbers.
__________________
|
07-16-2009, 04:14 PM | #21 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 103
Drives: 2012 sti
Rep Power: 16 |
1/4 mile times depend alot on the climate, grip from the tires, reaction times and optimal rpm launch. I would say with the mods I listed earlier that from a roll it would give alot of cars on the road a run for their money. Very few cars weigh under 3400 pounds let alone under 3300 and push 400 hp. I'm not a drag king but it would seem obvious that itd be scary fast from a roll gunning it around 6000 rpm on the highway, hitting close to max hp at the 8k rpm rev limit and being able to use the cars max torque to catapult you through the next gear. Assuming the hp/tq curves from the dynos I've seen are correct and obeying speeds limits of course.
|
07-16-2009, 07:39 PM | #22 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: La Mirada, ca
Posts: 40
Drives: 2011 370z
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
|
|
07-17-2009, 03:42 AM | #25 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 103
Drives: 2012 sti
Rep Power: 16 |
I'm pretty sure reaction times make a difference when you're quibbling over 1/10ths of a second in a 1/4 mile. A 2.1 vs 1.9 r/t could mean the difference between breaking the 12 sec. barrier and not. My point is that 1/4 mile times are too dependent on outside factors and nuanced skill. Case in point many 1/4 mile times in the track thread on this site in the upper 13's and even 14+. I can't say on this site that I'll be able to prove a modded 370's pulling power compared to an m3 but I can tell you it'd certainly be close.
|
07-17-2009, 08:56 AM | #26 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,659
Drives: 370 Z 7AT Sports
Rep Power: 19 |
I took my 370 Z to the track for the Ontario Z Drag day at St. Thomas Dragway ( Canada) 2 weeks ago. My average pass was 13.42 @ 107.9. Its a 7 AT.
My car had 286 RWHP with a Stillen G3 intake. Base line was 266. Elevation was 785 ft. If you look at the article were the car ran 13.1?. They rolled the car for the first foot. The more runs i made the higher the times went. Having nitrogen filled tires I watched the tire presure go to 40 lbs. I did not let the nitrogen out as i have no way to replace it. When i let the car cool for 1 hour it ran a 13.201 @ 103. ( i hit the limiter in 4th.) My fault!!. If i ran the tires at 26 psig it would have gone 12's easy. ) My slicks from my 2003 Z do not fit. 60 ft times!!!! 2.09 to 2.19 and higher. There is no way to get traction of the line. My 0 to 60 mile times based on the 1/8 mile and trap times. 4.41 seconds with a 2.09. 60 ft time. I have another modifation to the car. It has 4.08 gear in the diff. (i changed differenatal) My next upgrades will be the stillen CBE, berk cats, headers, and a tune from Cob. Sam at GTM will be making me a custom tune for my car when i send him the data. I also removed the spare tire, tools and anything else that i could to lighten the car. I tried to fit my RO Ja formula 5's on the car with 275 toyo's and i have to change the valve stem to clear the calipers. once this is done I can lower the air preasure in the rear tires and we will see what the car will do. I can cut189 to 1.90. 60 ft times with these tire.s With slicks my best time is 1.86. Lets get back to the 13.1? run done by the magazine. Did they start there run 1 foot back of the startng line and tripped the lights from a moving start ? That would make a big difference!!! I would love to post my time slips but i do not know how to do ? My time for the 370 is the quickist one to date. Mt times are certified by the Ontario Z club of Canada. The next drag day is in Septmber it will run 12's. But its not a stock car from the dealer show room. My current Z is a 2003 stillen 5 At that runs 13.09s It is currently being updated to a GTM 4.2, stroker with 850 wolf TTBB with a SFR 5 AT. tuned with a haltec. Sam at GTM is helping me with this project and he is agreat guy. Sam has my dyno charts for the 370 ( i emailed them to him). he did not belive that I got19.9 RWHP from the intake. He will be more that glad to back me up. I feel that the 13.1? is not a true indication of what this car run's 13.4 to 13.5 is more like it. My oil temp was 104 C (217 F) the car needs an oil cooler. Last edited by Z eliminator; 07-17-2009 at 09:12 AM. |
07-17-2009, 12:19 PM | #29 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So Cal baby!
Age: 51
Posts: 5,964
Drives: with passion
Rep Power: 321 |
You all need to have a little more faith in yer car! Besides, it's not a drag car. When I hear "track", I'm thinking something entirely different and frankly much more exciting.
|
07-17-2009, 12:37 PM | #30 (permalink) | ||
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3594 |
Quote:
Quote:
But a stock 370Z, even with the most professional of drag racers behind the wheel, will not hit the 12s, period. |
||
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ordering w/ Nismo Exhaust & Air Intake | hey32g | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 22 | 01-29-2018 09:28 PM |
Induction parts + ECU reflash dyno results | Phimosis | Tuning | 88 | 03-06-2010 04:26 AM |
HFC + Exhaust + Intake = 12's? | VertigoZ | Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip | 95 | 09-05-2009 05:13 AM |
Nismo Z Intake Question | GnmtGTR | Intake/Exhaust | 15 | 06-20-2009 02:25 PM |
Got Stillen G3 Longtube intake & Exhaust.. What next? | Dino 54 | Intake/Exhaust | 22 | 06-10-2009 08:23 PM |