![]() |
Hell yeah...nice #s!
|
OMG.. :eekdance:
Those numbers are awesome..!!!!! |
+20hp for just catback! sweet! I love the VHR!
|
forgive me if I missed this but this is 2.5" correct? If so, any plans on making a 3" for FI setups?
|
Quote:
We already have a 3" available for the VQDE/VQHR 350Z. But that does you no good! |
Quote:
|
Exciting numbers. Looks like you have one killer setup. Glad to see the performance came in so strong to match the awesome sound and looks. Throw in the strong weight savings and it looks like I finally will have to break down and order a cat back.
Kudos to the great engineering and design. You had to be damn proud when the numbers came up on the dyno. |
I am VERY happy I ordered this exhaust. Great #'s.
|
w00t ! I can't wait for the video with some HFC since a lot of us will be running those..I was gonna hold out on buying until someone posted a vid with their HFC on until I bought mine but if FI gets the vid up sooner then I may have to buy sooner !:driving:
|
what did it put down w/ the HFCs?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
UPDATE-
Here is where we are at so far: Baseline (Stock) Run 1- 281.94 RWH / 241.25 RWT Run 2- 276.51 RWH / 241.52 RWT Run 3- 284.12 RWH / 240.89 RWT Baseline Average: 280.86 RWH / 241.22 RWT F.I. TDX Cat Back 12" Resonators / Stock Cats Run 1- 300.81 RWH / 251.08 RWT Run 2- 301.62 RWH / 252.11 RWT Run 3- 301.30 RWH / 253.89 RWT F.I. TDX C.B. 12" Res. Average: 301.24 RWH / 252.36 RWT F.I. TDX Cat Back 12" Resonators / F.I. Resonated Test Pipes Run 1- 308.99 RWH / 259.05 RWT Run 2- 310.24 RWH / 258.32 RWT Run 3- 305.37 RWH / 258.70 RWT F.I. TDX Cat Back 12" Res. / F.I. R.T.P. Average: 308.20 RWH / 258.69 RWT F.I TDX Cat Back 12" Resonators / F.I. HFC's Run 1- 304.35 RWH / 258.33 RWT Run 2- 304.19 RWH / 258.25 RWT Run 3- 305.79 RWH / 258.50 RWT F.I. TDX Cat Back 12" Res. / F.I. HFC's Average: 304.78 RWH / 258.36 RWT During the dyno runs of the HFC's & R.T.P's I started the think as to why it wasn't making more power. Then I reviewed the numbers and realized that they were pretty standard as far as gains go. Remember that this car has stock air boxes and stock air filters. The car is only taking in so much air so it can only let out so much exhaust. Now, I am confident that the HFC's and R.T.P.'s will play much more of a part when a good cold air intake setup is on the car. The cat back itself, blew away our expectations! We are extremely pleased with the results. Bottom line, our cat back gave a bone stock 370Z 6MT an average of 20 RWH more and 11 FT LBS. of torque over stock. |
I told all of you from the beginning that we would be true with the numbers regardless of how good or bad they turned out!
After seeing gains like that for the cat back, if there was any critics, I think it put them to rest! I have the dyno charts and I will try to post them sometime tomorrow. Thank you all for being patient... Tony |
Good Sh!t :tiphat:
|
Bravo to rigid testing parameters!
I applaud you for great sound and great gains! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2