![]() |
Originally Posted by dislimn Loudness aside, what would have the most bass and sound the best CF non-res - stock cats CF non-res - 300cell HFC from FI CF 12"
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | ||
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,132
Drives: '09 PW Nismo
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
This is my current setup. *Fast Intentions Resonated 300 cell HFCs (runs through the 300 cell cat, with an 8" resonator immediately following) *Fast Intentions SS Catback with NONresonated X I've had first hand experience with each resonator size in the Xpipe(18", 12", and non-res), and the DEEPEST, THROATIEST sound is by far the non-resonated. Rather then giving the exhaust note that steady note at idle....its more of a rumble pissed off sound...wuwuwuwuwuwuwuw. Sorry, only way to attempt to explain it in words. I ran 18" resonators in the Xpipe with OEM cats, and the entire time I just wanted that liiiiiittle bit more. The added low-end gains from the RHFCs are felt immediately, and the exhaust gets nothing but deeper and sexier! Less resonators in the X, lower the tone/"bass". You can literally "feel" the tone of my exhaust outside the car at idle. I LOVE IT!!!! Acceleration Vids (first pull to 3500rpms, 2nd pull WOT) COLD START(and yes, actually COLD, temp was about 43 degrees >>excuse the clutch/flywheel chatter |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fast Intentions exhaust is here! | F.I. Inc. | Intake/Exhaust | 8307 | 06-09-2012 02:32 PM |
Fast Intentions exhaust just ordered | Jmigs81 | Intake/Exhaust | 32 | 02-12-2012 03:39 PM |
Fast Intentions Exhaust | Mark Gomez | Intake/Exhaust | 13 | 05-19-2011 07:51 PM |
ARK Exhaust vs. Fast Intentions | dnasty370z | Intake/Exhaust | 61 | 09-06-2010 06:25 PM |