Originally Posted by MaDMaXX Sorry, transposing them in my head, yes, i meant spark advance, point still remains Let me explain again. The dyno sheet from SZ shows two plots.
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-16-2012, 11:43 PM | #121 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
The dyno sheet from SZ shows two plots. Blue is the SZ tuned map and red is Church tuned map. If the the dyno sheet from Church shows gains, the same gains should show in the SZ dyno sheet. Both dyno sheets are comparing the same two tuned maps, which were completed in the same day within hours of each other.
__________________
Top Secret | EVO-R | Fujimura Auto | Shine Auto | Seibon | MRWorks | Swift | SPC | SSR | UpRev | Project Kics | NST | Titek | Eibach | Nismo | Whiteline | Quaife | Invidia | Fly1 | CF Element | Carbon Signal
|
|
03-17-2012, 12:24 AM | #122 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 292
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 13 |
Maybe i misunderstood what you wrote;
1) You had it tuned at Chruch, showed gains over the pulls on the same dyno moments earlier with the SZ tune on it. 2) You went to SZ, ran it on their dyno, showed ~same numbers. 3) You re-loaded the SZ tune whilst still on the SZ dyno and pulled it again. 4) There was no apparent difference between the two tunes on the SZ dyno. If all of the above is correct, what i'm suggesting, is that because the car already has the spark advance from the Church tune, then reloading the SZ tune (which didn't touch the advance) would not load any advance change because it doesn't contain spark advance in the SZ tune. That is what i believe the tune at Chruch was to show (gains possible with Shockwave & advance) So i'm saying that it looks like the reason you showed no change between the tunes when going back to the SZ tune, is because it still has the spark advance set from the Church tune. Make sense? |
03-17-2012, 12:47 AM | #123 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Quote:
1. At Church, the church tuned map showed gains over the baseline (specialty tuned map). 2. Drove to SZ, ran the car on dyno with Church tuned map. (red curve) 3. Then reflashed the ecu and ran the SZ tuned map. (blue) 4. Correct. Do you see how we're comparing the same maps? Only difference is the dyno machine. Do you see why gains seen at Church, should also be seen when I was at SZ?
__________________
Top Secret | EVO-R | Fujimura Auto | Shine Auto | Seibon | MRWorks | Swift | SPC | SSR | UpRev | Project Kics | NST | Titek | Eibach | Nismo | Whiteline | Quaife | Invidia | Fly1 | CF Element | Carbon Signal
|
|
03-17-2012, 01:20 AM | #124 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 292
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 13 |
Yes, that's how i understand what you did.
The point i'm making, is that the SZ map doesn't contain the "change" to the spark advance. Therefore, having had the Church tune on the car (which does contain the spark advance) and *then* putting the SZ map back on (which doesn't contain the spark advance details) The end result would then be that the spark advance would remain the Church setting even though the rest of the map would be on the SZ settings. That's why i suspect you wouldn't see a change when going back that way (Chruch to SZ) |
03-17-2012, 01:47 AM | #125 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
Ok I see why you are misunderstanding. You do know the timing settings do not jump from map to map right? The timing settings are exclusive to each map.
At Church, the timing settings with the Church map showed gains over the timing settings with SZ map. AT SZ, the timing setting with the Church map did not show gains over the timing settings with the SZ map. Do you see why I am confused why gains are seen at Church, while not at SZ?
__________________
Top Secret | EVO-R | Fujimura Auto | Shine Auto | Seibon | MRWorks | Swift | SPC | SSR | UpRev | Project Kics | NST | Titek | Eibach | Nismo | Whiteline | Quaife | Invidia | Fly1 | CF Element | Carbon Signal
|
03-17-2012, 02:03 AM | #126 (permalink) | |
Track Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 546
Drives: '08 Infiniti G37s
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
__________________
'08 Infiniti G37s - Forced Induction Fed |
|
03-17-2012, 01:00 PM | #129 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 345
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
__________________
GTM Twin Turbo Stage 2|GTR Turbo/Engine Gauges|KW V3 Coilovers|HKS Exhaust|Oil Cooler| Vossen CV1 |
|
03-17-2012, 01:21 PM | #130 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 292
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 13 |
This is why i posed it as a question, i'm not 100% sure how the uprev tune works, but in some tunes, only the altered values are loaded with a tune.
For example, and in this case, the suggestion i'm making, is that the SZ tune doesn't contain the spark advance change value, therefore, loading the SZ tune over the Church tune, results in the spark advance not changing. This was the way my SCT tune on the Mustang worked, i'm questioning whether the uprev works the same way. |
03-17-2012, 05:37 PM | #131 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 345
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
__________________
GTM Twin Turbo Stage 2|GTR Turbo/Engine Gauges|KW V3 Coilovers|HKS Exhaust|Oil Cooler| Vossen CV1 |
|
03-17-2012, 05:52 PM | #132 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 345
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 16 |
I dont want to jump to conclusions prematurely, but i want to applaud the OP for taking matters into his own hands. Instead of accepting the dyno showing gains from Church, he took the car to another shop to verify the gain at his own expense. I think the least we can get out of this story is that you cant always trust the hp gains on a dyno graph. I'm sure there are things that a tuner can do to make it seem like your car gained hp after tuning.
Product reviews are often swayed by partial sponsorship and/or discounts given on their purchase. Dont see many reviews based on true performance numbers like this one.
__________________
GTM Twin Turbo Stage 2|GTR Turbo/Engine Gauges|KW V3 Coilovers|HKS Exhaust|Oil Cooler| Vossen CV1 |
03-17-2012, 06:38 PM | #133 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,300
Drives: 2013 FBO E85 GTR
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
__________________
Scott |
|
03-17-2012, 07:45 PM | #134 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 345
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 16 |
Not saying that it happened in this situation, but it's definitely possible when people come back from tuners with 20-40 whp gains.
__________________
GTM Twin Turbo Stage 2|GTR Turbo/Engine Gauges|KW V3 Coilovers|HKS Exhaust|Oil Cooler| Vossen CV1 |
03-17-2012, 08:18 PM | #135 (permalink) |
Premium Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 |
Even the manufacturer said the gains from wouldn't be significant from one CBE to another
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review MOTORDYNE SHOCKWAVE E370 | quagmire87 | Intake/Exhaust | 84 | 05-11-2023 02:30 PM |
Ongoing Review For The Motordyne M370 ... | birdmanx1 | Engine & Drivetrain | 42 | 11-08-2017 11:42 PM |
MOTORDYNE ART Pipes - Review | Kastley85891 | Intake/Exhaust | 1193 | 08-24-2017 03:22 PM |
Motordyne ART pipes review | Methodical4u | Intake/Exhaust | 21 | 02-17-2017 11:11 AM |