![]() |
Originally Posted by whoLEEoh Remember guys you pay extra for the quality/sound/power. Motordyne a exhaust is exceeds the quality of invidia in welds/looks/customer service and sounds sexier(IMO but it differs
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Beaverton, Or
Posts: 1,110
Drives: 2008 G37 S
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Juiced! That is all you need to know !! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 384
Drives: Z
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
While it will show similar results for NA, it won't be hindered at all in forced induction applications. The Shockwave))) allows more headroom and versatility for forced induction because of the modular and progressive expansion design.
If you were to install a turbo later on you won't need to buy another exhaust to accommodate it. It will produce excellent results with no changes needed up to the ~500-600 HP range. Shockwave))) covers both NA and most turbo applications because of its design and modularity. It certainly has more flow capacity than a dual 2.25" system. And in many cases, in the 5 PSI-12 PSI range , the E370 overall performance will be better than either a full dual 2.5" or full dual 3" exhaust. The Shockwave))) E370 is unlike any other exhaust in that it hits the sweet spot for both NA and most FI applications. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 384
Drives: Z
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
Here are the same runs plotted in their respective groups and a little more clearly.
These are the spark timing and A/F tuned baseline runs. They are inconsistent and lumpy which indicates it was tuned to the power limit and running on the edge of ping. ![]() These are the A/F only tuned Shockwave))) post dyno runs. A near perfect overlay. They are very smooth and repeatable. If these runs were tuned in the same manner as the baseline runs, it would have made additional power. This is actually a perfect tune. Although more power could be made by advancing the spark timing, you don't really want to push it beyond what you see here. The engine is very happy with this tune. ![]() Here are both sets of runs overlaid. This shows the relative difference in set to set repeatability. ![]() The pre and post dyno runs were in different states of tune. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,300
Drives: 2013 FBO E85 GTR
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Tony provided you with the logic behind your installation and tune and you continue to ignore it and cry about peak whp gain on a NA CBE INSTALL. Did you honestly expect a huge jump in power going to another aftermarket cbe???
__________________
Scott |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]() Quote:
As for Tony saying the baseline run with the Gemini was tuned for AFR and timing and showed a lumpy curve. The tune I had for the baseline included the Motordyne M370 manifold which I removed from the car 2 weeks earlier. Could this be the cause for the lumpy curve? Did this cause the Z to lean out a bit? Look at the AFR baseline. It was running lean. If the Invidia baseline was re-tuned do you think the curve will still be lumpy? And if the Invidia baseline was re-tuned, a few more HP would have been squeezed out. How would that make the E370 look then? Just a few points the Z community should consider. Edit: I also had a blown 3-bolt exhaust gasket for the Invidia baseline runs. LOL
__________________
Top Secret | EVO-R | Fujimura Auto | Shine Auto | Seibon | MRWorks | Swift | SPC | SSR | UpRev | Project Kics | NST | Titek | Eibach | Nismo | Whiteline | Quaife | Invidia | Fly1 | CF Element | Carbon Signal
Last edited by 370Z JT; 02-27-2012 at 11:13 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 384
Drives: Z
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Most won't build a data base of independent tests on a public forum for public distribution. We do. There is nothing to hold back or hide. We'll do our best on our side and encourage independent reviews and testing. Even yours. More independent tests and comparisons will be done over a range of conditions by various people and they will all be posted for everyone to see. Thank you for doing the dyno testing and review. Tony |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 345
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 17 ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
It's very apparent that youre a Motordyne fan boy and want to defend the exhaust. That's fine but there's no need to be taking it out on the OP.
__________________
GTM Twin Turbo Stage 2|GTR Turbo/Engine Gauges|KW V3 Coilovers|HKS Exhaust|Oil Cooler| Vossen CV1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 292
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
It sounds like he's already annoyed at not getting what he was hoping for and i agree with you, i don't think it could have gone any better than it did. However, as i pointed out, he's complaining over a few HP at the top end and yet he already admitted the base tune wasn't very well because he altered a major intake part without changing the tune just weeks before this. It was already stated that these are both open exhausts, they're isn't going to much much in the performance of a completely open system, it's going to be down to sound, quality and looks, which he's happy with. I do like Motordyne products, but i can't defend something based purely on that. I, like everyone else, can read what's been posted, i was just pointing out an inconsistency of the same level it's being complained about for the power. He seems quite upset that it's the same power as before, with a smoother curve and better sound, not to mention if it was tuned again with spark advance, he could get more power. But like i said, he still seems quite upset over it all, i'm just pointing out he shouldn't be so, when he didn't do the fullest possible in the circumstances. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]() Quote:
The power numbers for the E370 would not change. It is what it is.
__________________
Top Secret | EVO-R | Fujimura Auto | Shine Auto | Seibon | MRWorks | Swift | SPC | SSR | UpRev | Project Kics | NST | Titek | Eibach | Nismo | Whiteline | Quaife | Invidia | Fly1 | CF Element | Carbon Signal
Last edited by 370Z JT; 02-27-2012 at 11:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 292
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I'm only reading what's been posted here, i don't know/have any other info, but from what i've ready, those are the inconsistencies, and i think they're enough for a few ponies difference. *Baseline tune not matched to installed hardware. *Re-tune not comprehensive enough to include spark advance. *Resulting peek power was the same but with a smoother power curve. Just calling it how i see it from the info here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,300
Drives: 2013 FBO E85 GTR
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Scott |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 3,277
Drives: 2010 Z Coupe M6 SPT
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Unless Tony told you his exhaust was going to make a decent amount of power more I think looking for a gain going from one aftermarket exhaust to another is just silly. I picked my FI because of quality and looks, all exhaust in this price range make around the same power.
__________________
2010 Base+Sport 6spd: Stillen G3, FI Non-Resonated CBE, FI Non-Resonated Test Pipes, UpRev Tuned, Custom 24R Oil Cooler, JDM Rear Fog-OEM Harness. ???Whp ???WTQ (Will find out come spring time) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,300
Drives: 2013 FBO E85 GTR
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() these are "high-end" exhaust systems and you are paying for the superior sound, quality of the product and customer service. it seems OP has experienced the "intoxicating sound", and commented on the "superb" quality of the product, and Tony was present during install and now is here helping him with any concerns and questions he has. sounds like he's getting his money's worth if you ask me ![]()
__________________
Scott |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brunei
Posts: 1,515
Drives: 370Z, 180SX
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Tony himself was present during the install, what more can i ask for. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review MOTORDYNE SHOCKWAVE E370 | quagmire87 | Intake/Exhaust | 84 | 05-11-2023 01:30 PM |
Ongoing Review For The Motordyne M370 ... | birdmanx1 | Engine & Drivetrain | 42 | 11-08-2017 10:42 PM |
MOTORDYNE ART Pipes - Review | Kastley85891 | Intake/Exhaust | 1193 | 08-24-2017 02:22 PM |
Motordyne ART pipes review | Methodical4u | Intake/Exhaust | 21 | 02-17-2017 10:11 AM |