![]() |
This discussion is absolutely painful. Go to bed, you're all cranky.
|
found this. learned a lot. supports pretty much what I already said, but did it in less of a stubborn ******* way. Exhaust noises and defining rasp. - MY350Z.COM Forums
chose the next closest thing to a 370 thats not a 370, its little bro 350. and dont say G...... in my mind those dont exist. |
Quote:
|
Wow... Absolutely some good readings here!! I tend to agree with synolimit's theory on Helmholtz resonators. I thought they are mainly used to cancel out the drone, but this "restore air pressure" thing totally makes sense to me.:tup: And that's why it makes the HKS Hi Power THE best exhaust out there because it has Helmholtz resonators!:tup: JK JK...:p
I also agree with Chii on the exhaust piping diameter theory. The bigger piping and less restrictive exhaust systems aren't always good for NA cars. It's not like the bigger the better. It has a limit. I learned this in a hard way.:) 2.5 inch piping is close to the optimal for the NA setup on our car. |
Quote:
Okay guy. Having a "vacuum" chamber hanging off your exhaust will improve scavenging, but also cause a flow inversion, so it's great for low to middle RPM range but does nothing positive for high rpm operation, which is all i care about. Of course a vendor is going to say that their expensive new product is great in every way. I can tell you right now, you don't make more power, but it doesn't matter. Bring your money down here and we'll set up on a mustang dyno back to back if you really want to 'bet' otherwise lets leave size out of this. Fact is, you've bought one of the least engineered and cheapest produced exhausts, then butchered it up with extra tubing, then paired it with the lowest-flowing longtube headers available, and now are preaching to someone who has spent far longer in the search for power in this platform. I'm done with the subject, do what you want, I'll keep doing what I'm doing. |
so you proved my point. this is beneficial for you. but most of the Z community doesnt have their car at 7500 rpm all day long every day. im sure you would be very interested in race cams too "if it wasnt for vvel" as they completely destroy every day usefulness of a car in benefit to one very specific scenario, racing. the whole point of the argument was showing the science behind it for what is better OVERALL, not just for you you you.
and just to toss this out there, price doesnt matter. my ark was 1700. is it 1000 better than some of the cheaper exhausts? no. is the amuse 3000 better than my ark? no. it doesnt work that way. its not a ******* scale. yes their are engineering differences, but aside from build material, quality, pipe diameter, shape, bends, welds and so on they are all functionally the same. and no ones to say a MORE expensive model couldnt in fact be out performed by a less expensive one. thats a rich douchbags way of looking at things. just move your slider from one side of the bar to the next. lemme just buy all the most expensive parts and that = im the fastest best mechanic in the world. durp. I can see you do EXACTLY that, as you bought the nismo R tune intakes "twice the price means better". guess what, the stillins gen 3s are cheaper and they perform much better. so shut up. according to your logic they are not engineered as well. due to price. |
Quote:
Try again? |
shock. you do have some common sense. But it still goes against your own way of thinking in your blind charge for OMGZOR infinite HP. your willing to have an exhaust setup that sounds like rotten asshats for extra ponies, but not willing to change out something that would still give you more HP and NOT make the car sound worse lol. counter intuitive ftw.
|
Quote:
I'm sorry you're so easily convinced by marking fluff, but if this worked, everyone would be doing it, including every racing team in every racing series the world over. |
Quote:
Actually I didn't read anything from a vender. and tony refuses to post his own testing. It's only customer dyno's and magazines that were curious about new and interesting looking projects so they tested also. Tony is some rocket scientist or something so I tend to believe a guy that knows what he's doing and then refuses to post results and tells buyers, "you post results so people believe you and don't think I'm lying or changing dyno graphs." If I had a second car I'd totally ship my CBE to you!! You do 3 runs with yours, do 3 with mine with zero rasp and ill bet. I'm not trying to compare size, I'm simply trying to tell you about physics. Lol and yeah that's all true about my products. Cause an exact copy of some one else's stuff is going to be so much worse than the original since it's an exact copy. You know what? Going to the dyno right now to show you a before and after eBay LTH with my CBE. |
:wtf2:
|
Boom!!!!
As promised. stock header and cats with a muffler that bends into the mufflers then bends out to the tips vs garage line LTH (looks like a eBay obx header), my Helmholtz welded in at the x pipe and straight pipes. No tune, still running rich! 13hp, 17tq peak, 18-19hp, 11-17tq mid range. http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...ps65d85e9b.jpg http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...ps3096e23d.jpg http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...psa0643479.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
N/A and supercharged cars: what you want with an exhaust is maximum scavenging, minimal exhaust back pressure, and the biggest possible exhaust size that will provide the most flow but wont cause the exhaust to cool before it leaves the tail pipe what happens when people slap 4in exhausts on a N/A honda is that the exhaust gas cools half way through the pipe slowing down the velocity thus creating a restriction, but at the same time you dont want a 2in exhaust because it is too small and can cause a restriction basically you want to find a good diameter sized pipe that not only allows the most flow, but one that will keep exhaust gases heated until it leaves the tail pipe Turbo: bigger diameter is always better and the shorter the distance, the better the turbo will perform, exhaust doesnt work the same way on a turbo car as it does on N/A and supercharged vehicles, on a turbo car, the more flow, and the shorter the piping, the better the turbo will spool turbos in a sense are exhaust restrictions, and the scavenging effect is more or less negated, you want to flow as much exhaust out of the turbine as quick as you can because the better the flow, the better the spool, and faster the spool, the faster you make max boost, and the faster your car goes. a popular mod for people to do on their turbo cars is an electric cutout on the downpipe so the turbo spools as quickly as possibly when racing, but when on the streets, you have a tame exhaust that is quiet im not trying to start an argument here, just stating that you're not 100% correct about bigger being worse and the reasons that you are giving are incorrect(to a point again) |
jeez, thats not half bad. I would have never called THAT much. I have absolutely NO IDEA if I gained anything with my ark dts or not. never had the 13 dyno'd and havent tuned it since install. to be honest, i HOPE it does but i really dont give a ****. when its TT it wont matter anyway.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2