08-01-2011, 12:06 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 4,776
Drives: Baby Shark
Rep Power: 701616
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methodical4u
Well no one has done an independent test on the 370... people keep trying to bring up the G37, and I said that I felt like the airflow for the G37 would enable the R2C's to produce more power and then a few people basically laughed it off.
Has anyone looked at the front of a G37 lately? The whole front end is open for airflow! No wonder it can make power close equal to the G3's.
|
I think you and I are looking at this the same way. I don't know enough about air flow and fluid dynamics to definitevly say that the G37 will post higher #s than the Z with the R2Cs, However, I do know that I'd like to see a dyno with an intake on MY friggin car before I drop 400+ bones on a part. that said, I do want to believe the R2Cs are better than the dropins/PMT option, if only so I can squeeze a couple more ponies outta the car.
I hope Tony makes a kick a$$ intake that will post repeatable good gains etc and not be a pain in the a$$ requiring bumper removal and have fitment issues ala G3 and a/c lines etc.
I'm willing to wait and see what Tony comes up with and then hopefully by then be able to compare his dyno results ot R2C and see which comes out on top. (I was about to go ahead and plan to order the R2Cs in a few months but now I will wait since motordyne makes such good products)
|
|
|
Similar Threads
13Likes
Threaded Mode
