![]() |
Originally Posted by Motordyne Yes the exhaust is in work now. Working on routing tubing and testing various primary diameters. No release date yet, I will make a post on
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 4,776
Drives: Baby Shark
Rep Power: 701616 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Any chance you could spill a bit of info on this, even if it's just what your goals for the intake system are? I know I'm not the only one unwilling to go the route of the G3's, with the bumper removal issue etc, and I'm still not convinced the R2C's are worth the money or can outperform drop ins and PMTs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,393
Drives: 11 370 6mt pw w/sp
Rep Power: 17 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Has anyone looked at the front of a G37 lately? The whole front end is open for airflow! No wonder it can make power close equal to the G3's. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 4,776
Drives: Baby Shark
Rep Power: 701616 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I hope Tony makes a kick a$$ intake that will post repeatable good gains etc and not be a pain in the a$$ requiring bumper removal and have fitment issues ala G3 and a/c lines etc. I'm willing to wait and see what Tony comes up with and then hopefully by then be able to compare his dyno results ot R2C and see which comes out on top. (I was about to go ahead and plan to order the R2Cs in a few months but now I will wait since motordyne makes such good products) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,393
Drives: 11 370 6mt pw w/sp
Rep Power: 17 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Framingham MA
Posts: 2,732
Drives: 2014 Q50 AWD
Rep Power: 20 ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I have been thinking about TP's or HFC's get closer to 320WHP,
__________________
14 Q50 AWD, ARK, ECUTEK (SEB), Takda, ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 279
Drives: '11 Gunmetal 370Z MT
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I've heard a lot of good things about these pipes, and they look really amazing. Personally I don't care a whole lot about how they affect the sound, but I'm curious about the power gains.
The skeptic in me is still having a hard time believing how it can produce gains over regular test pipes. Dyno tests seem to show improvement over the whole rpm range (in comparisons to regular test pipes). But if it uses resonance to produce gains, then my brain is telling me that any gains should be limited to a specific resonant frequency. I like understanding the technology behind stuff before pulling the trigger on a purchase. Any chance Motordyne can chime in on how exactly that is possible? Or is it a trade secret? ![]() I'm also kinda torn because I want these, but I also want long tube headers. Are you guys planning on making headers with these built in? Last edited by ChipsWithDips; 08-03-2011 at 02:30 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: Motordyne M370 Manifold w/ Comparisons | Staples | Intake/Exhaust | 66 | 06-21-2014 01:35 PM |
Motordyne test pipes? | Dan Z Man | Intake/Exhaust | 37 | 12-15-2010 09:12 PM |
Motordyne Intake Manifold on the way!! | GZ3 | Intake/Exhaust | 67 | 09-16-2010 12:49 AM |
another FI 18" CF CBE review w/ test pipes | mrdino77 | Intake/Exhaust | 9 | 05-27-2010 12:13 PM |