Yeah, Tony is really stepping it up. He is giving Motordyne a great presence on the forums in a short amount of time.

Another +1 from me.

Thanks guys!

My objective is to make a complete line of NA bolt ons. Each of which is to be the best in its class. A little time and we will get there.

^atleast your starting early for the HRs compared to DEs. You should be okay in couple of years. :D

I plan to do it faster than that. ;)

I plan to do some further testing with nick on Sunday. Our cars were identical in speed if not me a touch quicket a few weeks back. Gonna go to the " local track " and see if it's any different this Sunday or monday.

I thought the loss at the top end was expected as the runners changed to give more mid range? So should the longer runners give gains from start to finish or just in the mid range where we lack a bit?

Tony backs up everything he produces out to the market, also has outstanding customer care. Good job Motordyne!!!!

Can’t wait for the Art Pipes and Exhaust!!!

On the data Tony provided there was no loss at the top end, it sort of leveled out with stock, the gains were expected from 3-6k give or take. I think I'm noticing the loss up top because my car was making more power than stock. I'm not all that surprised about it since it's somewhat expected when lengthening the runners. I was just hoping it wasn't the case since it didn't seem to happen on a stock car in Tony's testing.

Well then they should know with these cars 13:1 air fuel ratio is not the magic number on these motors as I've seen time after time with multiple tuned VHRs. They like the extra fuel, most power that was made for me was 12.4 - 12.5. I made 16whp+ over baseline on a 85 degree day with 60% humidity with a good amount of heatsoak.

Which is why independent dynos are always good to have. Top end loss isnt too bad with mid range gain but it would be nice to keep what you have and then gain too.

Sounds like you will need your ECU tuned, with all the Mods you have going.

yeah thats a great idea dude :icon14:

LOL. Maybe reading through the thread before posting should be a requirement.