Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   K&N Typhoon Release (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/18350-k-n-typhoon-release.html)

Ct Chip 04-28-2010 08:55 AM

K&N Typhoon Release
 
69-7078TS - K&N 69 Series Typhoon Kits, Performance Intake Kit

vipor 04-28-2010 09:01 AM

3 Attachment(s)
http://www.knfilters.com/images/l/69-7078TS.jpg

Estimated Horsepower Gain: 14.2 HP @ 5600 RPM
Street Legal In All States: No
System Type: Cold-air intake system
TUV Approved (Europe): No
Weight: 11.7 lb (5.3 kg)

http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1272463271

http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1272463271

Doesn't look very "Cold Air"

EDIT: :rofl2: @ "4th gear"

G Fo12ce 04-28-2010 09:06 AM

It may be prove to be a good intake but to me it seems dumb to have used filters with capped tops since they sit right behind the fresh air ducts in the core support. I know they have versions with filtered tops like this:

http://www.knfilters.com/images/xtsream-clampon.jpg

Maybe it doesn't make a difference, who knows...

Vegitto-kun 04-28-2010 09:50 AM

they should call intakes like this

EAI


Engine air intakes

370zFORme!! 04-28-2010 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegitto-kun (Post 516783)
they should call intakes like this

EAI


Engine air intakes

But intakes are made for the engine, so that would actually be correct nomenclature.

LaSeeno 04-28-2010 12:20 PM

Do they retail for 1k?

Has anyone done temperature analysis in these areas? I was under the impression that our cars had passages which led cool air to these areas. I read somewhere that the stock air boxes are already cold air intakes.

Could it be possible that there isn't much of a difference between temperatures in the grill and engine bay due to the 370's design?

toxik 04-28-2010 03:31 PM

yeah where to buy? i wanna see the price

Michael@TheZStore 04-28-2010 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxik (Post 517204)
yeah where to buy? i wanna see the price

It will be availble on our website by this weekend.
Somewhere around $300-$315 range.

Michael

fuct 04-28-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370zFORme!! (Post 516829)
But intakes are made for the engine, so that would actually be correct nomenclature.

HAI

hot air intakes

kenchan 04-28-2010 04:27 PM

data taken with the hood open?

kevin.z 04-28-2010 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuct (Post 517257)
HAI

hot air intakes

this is probably has the same gains as the top secret air intake.

6spd 04-28-2010 06:49 PM

that much power and the temp went up 7 degrees?!?! que? seems to good to be true!

redroadster10 04-30-2010 09:47 AM

14.2 hp with shorter tubing compared to the injens 15 hp an stillens 18 hp longer tube intakes......... is this even true ? i like opening the hood an being able to see the filters an with gains that good for a shorter tube intake i would def be interested in this only if this is true

NXTAZEE 04-30-2010 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redroadster10 (Post 519681)
14.2 hp with shorter tubing compared to the injens 15 hp an stillens 18 hp longer tube intakes......... is this even true ? i like opening the hood an being able to see the filters an with gains that good for a shorter tube intake i would def be interested in this only if this is true

Me too but those gains seem quite optimistic.

ilive2win 04-30-2010 12:31 PM

i have them installed, i like them, but i doubt its gains above 7 hp. i havent done any dyno runs with them installed but def doesnt feel like 14hp. i was one of the test cars used by k&n. great product but i dont think the gains are that much in reality, but i dont feel any heat soak, and the intakes do have heat shields. i didnt want to get any crazy intakes though because i want to maybe supercharge it later, so i went with free intakes :tup:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...n/00610000.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...00710000-1.jpg

NXTAZEE 04-30-2010 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilive2win (Post 519865)
i have them installed, i like them, but i doubt its gains above 7 hp. i havent done any dyno runs with them installed but def doesnt feel like 14hp. i was one of the test cars used by k&n. great product but i dont think the gains are that much in reality, but i dont feel any heat soak, and the intakes do have heat shields. i didnt want to get any crazy intakes though because i want to maybe supercharge it later, so i went with free intakes :tup:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...n/00610000.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...00710000-1.jpg

A free intake is a good intake ;). Honestly though can you feel any improvement? Also, how does it sound?

ilive2win 04-30-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NXTAZEE (Post 519881)
A free intake is a good intake ;). Honestly though can you feel any improvement? Also, how does it sound?

well i had my hks exhaust and hfc installed right at the same time the intakes were installed so of course i felt more power. with the exhaust, the intakes sound great. not that loud though. i think the injens are louder. def louder than stock. sounds good though.

i lucked out on this deal with the intakes, i was in the market for some intakes when thisdeal popped up. i was about to get the injens. i wasnt going to pay 900-1000 bucks for intakes, thats rediculous, especially if your not going to keep them on forever and going a different route later on

6spd 04-30-2010 04:36 PM

The welds make them look really cheap, like APC kinda cheap. Maybe its just the pics, IDK.

tjlazer 04-30-2010 04:52 PM

I think I might get these if the price is right...

Tresfr 04-30-2010 07:57 PM

Definatley good for 3 heart stopping horsepower
 
I have been happy to see companies like F1,Stillen, and Invidia comment on power gains and when independent dynos come out they are really close to the claims. Large aftermarket companies like K&N and many others are notorious for outrageous claims and I have no doubt this K&N won't make close to the claimed HP and on a hot day I would not be surprised if it were lower than stock.

Buy these for looks and sound but not power. I think there are better looking short ram intakes out there.

Nikon FM 04-30-2010 09:16 PM

Interesting detail. Look at the diameter change between where the sensor plugs in and downstream to where the intake connects to the engine. Essentially the step change would slow the flow down compared to the sensor location and then the step would induce turbulence in the flow to the engine………….new science for gains? :ugh2:

ZKindaGuy 04-30-2010 09:19 PM

I'm reading the responses and I am getting the impression that folks here think that if a car runs air intakes with no box enclosure or shields that form an enclosure with the hood that the temperatures of the air are going to be outragiously high. I believe this is coming from a lack of detail understanding in regards to the dymnamics occurring with the air under teh hood. There are alot of things coming into play that impact the intake air temperatures.

I have performed air intake temperature tuning while collecting and analyzing the ECU data for ambient and air-intake temperatures as measured by a function of the MAF sensor when aggressively tuning my various Mustangs and using air kits composed of various materials and physical configurations. I found the following results when doing the testing:

If I used a kit having titaneum piping + air cones with shields, I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature consistently stayed within 4 degrees of each other.

If the titaneum piping was replaced with a chrome plated pipe I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature stayed consistently 15 to 30 degrees apart from each other. BTW the chrome plated test actually had the air intake out in the wheel well. I was expecting cooler intake-air temperatures and found instead the chrome completely saturates the incoming air with heat.

If the titaneum or chrome plated intake piping was replaced with a rubber pipe I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature stayed consistently within 2 degrees of each other.

If the shielding was removed on any of the above configurations I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature consistently stayed within 4 to 6 degrees of each other.


So a couple of things I concluded about judging air intake kits in terms of the overall performance of each or compared with each other:

1. Consider the materials used to construct the kit as this is usually the major factor (versus containment OR location) that causes the air temperatures to rise. CHROME plated piping is the worst piping material one can construct an air intake kit from. Titanium is usually better and rubber intake piping is usually the better of either of the other two. The question you need to ask yourself for this one is "Do I want performance gains or do I want the engine bay catch the onlooker attention at the expense of potential performance?"

2. The location of the air cone is important (inside the bay v. outside the bay)....HOWEVER...it's position is NOT going to mean jack-squat if you disregard #1 above (what are the materials comprising the piping?). In the case of exterior bay located air cones, if the air kit uses CHROME PLATED pipes then they will not soak heat to warm the air intake air IF THE CHROME PLATED PIPING IS ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BAY. However expect that that portion of CHROME PLATED PIPE that is running inside the engine bay to get hot and heat the air intake temperatures which can result in some temperature-gain offsetting of some temperature loss made from the exterior locatied portion of the intake-piping.

3. Notice in the testing I had done I kept emphasing "WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING".....the air-intake and ambiant temperatures will stay within a close range of each other (except CHROME intakes) if the car is MOVING. The moment the car stops at a light or something and begins to sit for more than 10 seconds the air intake temperatures will begin to rise fast and continue doing so until the air starts moving again through the engine bay when the car is moving. Depending on the weather outside and how long the car sits still, I have seen the air temperatures arise as much as 75 degrees above the ambient air temperatures. And then expect a good five to ten minutes of continuous moving of the car to get teh air-intake and ambient temperatures back within a reasonable proximity of each other.

This is the one point I find most people just don't get. The air-intake and ambiant temperatures stay within very reasonable and close proximity of each other while the car is moving. WHY? Because you just wouldn't believe how torrent the air flow is from the free flowing air entering the air-damn areas and being deflected off the various angles of the engine part assemblies. And yes I actually did a study of this as well when I was trying to decide between using a "no-shield" versus a "shield" configuration for that particular Stang....so yes there is HOT air occurring under the hood produced by the engine BUT when the car is moving the HOT air is being continuously flushed out of every crevise the air can get through by the torrent currents of air caused by the air entering the air-damns while the cars is moving. This is a good reason to have heat extractors as part of the external hood surface design.

And this brings me to point #4: From what I determined from teh shield testing the shields are there more to mitigate the torrent air flow happening as explained in #3 and just about zero in regards to functioning to control the rise in air-intake temperatures. In fact, I don't call these shields "HEAT" shields...I refer to them as "DEFLECTOR" shields or "WASH" shields as their function is mostly about controlling currents of air around the air-cone so a smooth induction of air can take place before being measured by the MAF sensor.

So my point I am trying to make here is there is alot of myth wrapped up in the various discussions about CAI kits because people are just repeating hearsay again and again from others without realizing the true nature of the complex dynamics occurring under the hood in regards to the CAI kit material design and its functional physics.

So I hope this provides a basis for understanding your car in this particular area of interest a little better.

Nikon FM 04-30-2010 10:17 PM

^ Thanks! Having an understanding of the data is key!

6spd 05-01-2010 06:33 AM

bravo! I remember guys doing this same test on the clubrsx forums. the results can be disheartening to say the least. with the plethora of materials available and each with its own distinct cost factor, usually the more expensive "exotic" type materials have better overall performance. but like zkindaguy said, plain old rubber hoses do their job just fine. it would be neat to see carbon or fiberglass boxes like Mugen makes for hondas!

tjlazer 05-01-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKindaGuy (Post 520456)
1. Consider the materials used to construct the kit as this is usually the major factor (versus containment OR location) that causes the air temperatures to rise. CHROME plated piping is the worst piping material one can construct an air intake kit from. Titanium is usually better and rubber intake piping is usually the better of either of the other two.

2. The location of the air cone is important (inside the bay v. outside the bay)....HOWEVER...it's position is NOT going to mean jack-squat if you disregard #1 above (what are the materials comprising the piping?). In the case of exterior bay located air cones, if the air kit uses CHROME PLATED pipes then they will not soak heat to warm the air intake air IF THE CHROME PLATED PIPING IS ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BAY. However expect that that portion of CHROME PLATED PIPE that is running inside the engine bay to get hot and heat the air intake temperatures which can result in some temperature-gain offsetting of some temperature loss made from the exterior locatied portion of the intake-piping.


So what you are saying is that the Stillen G3 CAI would be a lot better with rubber piping instead of chrome? WOW :ughdance:

G Fo12ce 05-01-2010 11:58 AM

Have you ever seen the Password JDM intake for the S2000? Something like that would be cool. Expensive, but they it sounds like they put a lot of engineering in the design and nice materials.

PWJDM S2K Intake

Pic of the kevlar version (the make dry carbon too)
http://passwordjdm.com/images/Products/2437_2.jpg
http://passwordjdm.com/images/Products/2437_5.jpg
http://passwordjdm.com/images/Products/2437_3.jpg

frost 05-01-2010 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 517266)
data taken with the hood open?

With a fan blowing cold air on them.

vipor 05-01-2010 12:50 PM

That's like a stomach and liver for a s2k or somethin

ZKindaGuy 05-01-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6spd (Post 520741)
bravo! I remember guys doing this same test on the clubrsx forums. the results can be disheartening to say the least. with the plethora of materials available and each with its own distinct cost factor, usually the more expensive "exotic" type materials have better overall performance. but like zkindaguy said, plain old rubber hoses do their job just fine. it would be neat to see carbon or fiberglass boxes like Mugen makes for hondas!

Carbon fiber piping works well in terms of mitgating heat however the carbon pipe over time has a problem of sliding out of place at its connecting intersection with the intake plenum from vibrations because of the carbon-fiber smoothness. If it wasn't for that one flaw the use of carbon-fiber would be more prevalent in the making of the piping.

ZKindaGuy 05-01-2010 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjlazer (Post 520884)
So what you are saying is that the Stillen G3 CAI would be a lot better with rubber piping instead of chrome? WOW :ughdance:

Well I think the majority of the piping of the G3 piping lies outside the engine bay doesn't it? Any portion of the piping lying inside the engine bay will be subject to heat however. Remember I stated that there would be some amount of temperature raising from inside piping that would offset some amount of temperature lowering that occurs from the outside piping. Overall the G3 would and appears to still produce a performance gain because the lowering in temperature exceeds the raising in temperature degrees so the final temperature being measured at the MAF is still an oveerall net lowering.

There is a problem with using all rubber however that I failed to say in my first posting. And that is the coefficient of friction is greater for rubber than metal. So the "fluid" air flow running through the rubber pipe will be slower than in metal pipe. However the air temperatures in a rubber pipe will be maintained to be much lower than in metal pipe.

This speaks directly to my exact point I am making when I said there are alot of dynamics going on regarding the air flow and temperature and that it isn't just a simple straight matter of fact when comparing CAI kits.

ZKindaGuy 05-01-2010 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vipor (Post 520959)
That's like a stomach and liver for a s2k or somethin

:icon18::icon18::icon18:

Zsteve 05-01-2010 06:00 PM

And this is why the stock CAI and drop ins do very well. Im 8-10 degrees abov e ambient with this setup.

batman_4 05-01-2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZKindaGuy (Post 520456)
I'm reading the responses and I am getting the impression that folks here think that if a car runs air intakes with no box enclosure or shields that form an enclosure with the hood that the temperatures of the air are going to be outragiously high. I believe this is coming from a lack of detail understanding in regards to the dymnamics occurring with the air under teh hood. There are alot of things coming into play that impact the intake air temperatures.

I have performed air intake temperature tuning while collecting and analyzing the ECU data for ambient and air-intake temperatures as measured by a function of the MAF sensor when aggressively tuning my various Mustangs and using air kits composed of various materials and physical configurations. I found the following results when doing the testing:

If I used a kit having titaneum piping + air cones with shields, I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature consistently stayed within 4 degrees of each other.

If the titaneum piping was replaced with a chrome plated pipe I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature stayed consistently 15 to 30 degrees apart from each other. BTW the chrome plated test actually had the air intake out in the wheel well. I was expecting cooler intake-air temperatures and found instead the chrome completely saturates the incoming air with heat.

If the titaneum or chrome plated intake piping was replaced with a rubber pipe I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature stayed consistently within 2 degrees of each other.

If the shielding was removed on any of the above configurations I found that WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING the air intake temperature and the ambient air temperature consistently stayed within 4 to 6 degrees of each other.


So a couple of things I concluded about judging air intake kits in terms of the overall performance of each or compared with each other:

1. Consider the materials used to construct the kit as this is usually the major factor (versus containment OR location) that causes the air temperatures to rise. CHROME plated piping is the worst piping material one can construct an air intake kit from. Titanium is usually better and rubber intake piping is usually the better of either of the other two. The question you need to ask yourself for this one is "Do I want performance gains or do I want the engine bay catch the onlooker attention at the expense of potential performance?"

2. The location of the air cone is important (inside the bay v. outside the bay)....HOWEVER...it's position is NOT going to mean jack-squat if you disregard #1 above (what are the materials comprising the piping?). In the case of exterior bay located air cones, if the air kit uses CHROME PLATED pipes then they will not soak heat to warm the air intake air IF THE CHROME PLATED PIPING IS ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BAY. However expect that that portion of CHROME PLATED PIPE that is running inside the engine bay to get hot and heat the air intake temperatures which can result in some temperature-gain offsetting of some temperature loss made from the exterior locatied portion of the intake-piping.

3. Notice in the testing I had done I kept emphasing "WHILE THE CAR IS MOVING".....the air-intake and ambiant temperatures will stay within a close range of each other (except CHROME intakes) if the car is MOVING. The moment the car stops at a light or something and begins to sit for more than 10 seconds the air intake temperatures will begin to rise fast and continue doing so until the air starts moving again through the engine bay when the car is moving. Depending on the weather outside and how long the car sits still, I have seen the air temperatures arise as much as 75 degrees above the ambient air temperatures. And then expect a good five to ten minutes of continuous moving of the car to get teh air-intake and ambient temperatures back within a reasonable proximity of each other.

This is the one point I find most people just don't get. The air-intake and ambiant temperatures stay within very reasonable and close proximity of each other while the car is moving. WHY? Because you just wouldn't believe how torrent the air flow is from the free flowing air entering the air-damn areas and being deflected off the various angles of the engine part assemblies. And yes I actually did a study of this as well when I was trying to decide between using a "no-shield" versus a "shield" configuration for that particular Stang....so yes there is HOT air occurring under the hood produced by the engine BUT when the car is moving the HOT air is being continuously flushed out of every crevise the air can get through by the torrent currents of air caused by the air entering the air-damns while the cars is moving. This is a good reason to have heat extractors as part of the external hood surface design.

And this brings me to point #4: From what I determined from teh shield testing the shields are there more to mitigate the torrent air flow happening as explained in #3 and just about zero in regards to functioning to control the rise in air-intake temperatures. In fact, I don't call these shields "HEAT" shields...I refer to them as "DEFLECTOR" shields or "WASH" shields as their function is mostly about controlling currents of air around the air-cone so a smooth induction of air can take place before being measured by the MAF sensor.

So my point I am trying to make here is there is alot of myth wrapped up in the various discussions about CAI kits because people are just repeating hearsay again and again from others without realizing the true nature of the complex dynamics occurring under the hood in regards to the CAI kit material design and its functional physics.

So I hope this provides a basis for understanding your car in this particular area of interest a little better.

:tup:

6spd 05-01-2010 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zsteve (Post 521301)
And this is why the stock CAI and drop ins do very well. Im 8-10 degrees abov e ambient with this setup.

I just got the K&N filters too, love'em:tup:

Zsteve 05-01-2010 07:26 PM

I know some people with the G3s have measured their intake temps at 7 - 10 degrees above ambient temps so not all chrome are as high as others for what ever reason. So maybe the design Zkindaguy used was not as good as the G3s. What would be a good test would be to replace the G3 piping with rubber but with the same dsesign and length and see what the temp differences are.

Zsteve 05-01-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6spd (Post 521358)
I just got the K&N filters too, love'em:tup:

do the Modshack DIY and the temp might drop another 1 or 2 degrees.

RCZ 05-01-2010 07:34 PM

Which intakes are chromed?? Do you mean polished?? please tell me I'm understanding your post incorrectly and you mean chromed...

Stillen intake is polished...not chrome....as are almost all other "shiny" ones in the market. Chrome intakes = ghetto fabulous.

Anyway, nice to see KN jump into the mix, they had awesome intakes for the STI. As most have said and someone tested, the claimed hp gains are probably bogus....

Zsteve 05-01-2010 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 521373)
Which intakes are chromed?? Do you mean polished?? please tell me I'm understanding your post incorrectly and you mean chromed...

Stillen intake is polished...not chrome....as are almost all other "shiny" ones in the market. Chrome intakes = ghetto fabulous.

Anyway, nice to see KN jump into the mix, they had awesome intakes for the STI. As most have said and someone tested, the claimed hp gains are probably bogus....

Yea thats true, I wonder how much of a difference that would make between the two. I think the only thing the stock intakes need besides the drop ins are the smoother tubes and they would be great. Its just too bad the tubes cost so damn much for some rubber.

ZKindaGuy 05-02-2010 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 521373)
Which intakes are chromed?? Do you mean polished?? please tell me I'm understanding your post incorrectly and you mean chromed...

Stillen intake is polished...not chrome....as are almost all other "shiny" ones in the market. Chrome intakes = ghetto fabulous.

Anyway, nice to see KN jump into the mix, they had awesome intakes for the STI. As most have said and someone tested, the claimed hp gains are probably bogus....

I meant chromed not polished. The only picture I remember seeing of a Stillen G3 was one where the piping appeared in the picture to be chromed.

One particular manufacturer that I know makes chromed plated intake piping is MAC and this was the cullprit I had used on the Stang I referred to where the chroming made the piping get streaming hot.

Word of caution...don't read my OP response with any idea that I was targeting the G3 because I wasn't. The points I made about what any CAI is materially composed of is completely valid despite the apparent admission that the G3's are polished and NOT chromed.

k20z3 05-02-2010 03:09 AM

Very nice


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2