Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Intake/Exhaust (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/)
-   -   JWT Pop Chargers Coming Soon! (http://www.the370z.com/intake-exhaust/1429-jwt-pop-chargers-coming-soon.html)

M.Bonanni 01-19-2009 12:23 PM

JWT Pop Chargers Coming Soon!
 
Just got off the phone with Jim Wolf Technology and I will be bringing the Double Down Motorsports Shop 370Z down there soon for test fitment of their new 370Z twin pop-charger intake system!

Here is a shot of the G37 twin intake system for an idea as to what it will look like...

http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/ima..._INSTALLED.jpg

They have seen gains in the 6.5 - 10whp range with these intakes on the G37!

RCZ 01-19-2009 12:38 PM

Could you tell me what the difference between "pop chargers" and short-ram intakes is?

M.Bonanni 01-19-2009 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCZ (Post 21695)
Could you tell me what the difference between "pop chargers" and short-ram intakes is?

A fancy name. :)

AK370Z 01-19-2009 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDMotorsports (Post 21697)
A fancy name. :)

:icon17: good answer!

chubbs 01-19-2009 12:59 PM

...and they look so pretty :leghump:

Slidefox 01-19-2009 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDMotorsports (Post 21697)
A fancy name. :)

:icon18:

G in ny 01-19-2009 04:20 PM

was never a fan of jwt any new on any other brands? Injen?

Nismo 370z 01-19-2009 04:28 PM

Ooh nice. Wonder what it will sound like. I have the pop charger on my 350 and she screams above 4k.

Crash 01-19-2009 10:13 PM

You think getting rid of those corrugated would help performance?

ZforMe 01-19-2009 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crash (Post 21956)
You think getting rid of those corrugated would help performance?


I would think so, plus they look ugly.

Crash 01-20-2009 02:29 AM

^^^ Yeah, no matter the performance results, they're GONE! LOL

I'm still going to get the turbo kit, so they're gone anyway, but if I wasn't, those things would be left in a dumpster.

Zissou 01-20-2009 03:05 AM

i have a JWT pop charger on my 300ZX TT, but thats TT, these seem a bit short and appear to pull air from a rather stagnant and warm source, further up/in than the stock airboxes.

i believe a true CAI would yield better results for an N/A, i would wait for AEM or Injen if you're sticking with N/A.

RCZ 01-20-2009 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zissou (Post 22038)
i have a JWT pop charger on my 300ZX TT, but thats TT, these seem a bit short and appear to pull air from a rather stagnant and warm source, further up/in than the stock airboxes.

i believe a true CAI would yield better results for an N/A, i would wait for AEM or Injen if you're sticking with N/A.

Sorta, the airbox openings im sure are still drawing air into that area. Also the gain in intakes, in general, comes far more from the removal of restriction to make it more free flowing, rather than from a drop in intake temperatures. (although that helps as well). Its a trade off between cool air and restrictiveness. CAI's are obviously going to be more restrictive than SRI's. I do wish these removed the ENTIRE corrugated section to the TB.

ZforMe 02-28-2009 07:55 PM

Anyone know if there is any weight savings with using these over stock?

Frick@DDM 02-28-2009 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZforMe? (Post 36938)
Anyone know if there is any weight savings with using these over stock?


If there are any, maybe a pound from taking out the airboxes...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2