![]() |
I've scoured our Forums for about 3 hours and can not find anything regarding the differences / pros and cons of a 300 Cell Substrate HFC compared to a 200
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lithia, FL
Age: 51
Posts: 552
Drives: 09 Nissan 370z CS M6
Rep Power: 187 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I've scoured our Forums for about 3 hours and can not find anything regarding the differences / pros and cons of a 300 Cell Substrate HFC compared to a 200 or 150. Can any of your experienced guys give me the pros and cons of each? Ie I would assume that a 300 Cell HFC should be quieter and less rasp, while a 150 Cell HFC could potentially have more flow and thus might make 1 or 2 more HP or Torque. Am I correct with those assumptions?
The reason is that I am trying to determine which HFC I would like installed ont he Z. Obviously, I will get a different CBE at a later time. Just wanted to know the pros and cons of the different HFC's out there. Thanks, TipsZ
__________________
Dynojet 285 HP/245 TQ (pre CBE)// Agency Power CBE // GTM Test Pipes // JWT Pop Chargers // B&M Short Shifter // Eibach Springs // Powder-coated Akebono's // Powder-coated Strut Bar // Black Chromed 19" Rays // // Redline Designs Graphics TipsZ journal |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|