![]() |
I believe these intercoolers are more efficient.
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: KCMO
Posts: 1,597
Drives: 2017 ZL1 Camaro
Rep Power: 370 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I would have to agree. Instead of each turbo sharing a single inner cooler now each turbo has it's own inner cooler. Plus it also appears to allow more air to flow into the radiator due to the gap in between the two. Just a guess but seems right.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7335 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
The other intercooler is 3.5" thick, 13x24" and rated at 1000 bhp, I believe these are 3", 12x12 x2 and rated at 900hp. To keep the crash bar, they had to use two smaller ones to push these farther in and not get in the way of the radiator support beam (whatever it's called). I think it's a worthwhile sacrifice to keep the crash beam with the two smaller ones than the single large intercooler.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GTM Performance Engineering 370Z SUPERCHARGER KIT PRESS RELEASE | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 1161 | 02-16-2014 08:21 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering: Mild 7 A/T Twin Turbo Build | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 37 | 12-11-2013 12:23 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering: 370Z MHI Twin Turbo Pre-Release | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 120 | 09-06-2013 06:21 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering stage 2 600hp supercharger kits line-up press release | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 305 | 09-27-2012 03:23 PM |