![]() |
Call these guys and order some straighteners cut to the diameter of the inlet pipes. Install (with epoxy) directly before the MAFs. That flutter will go away. Honeycomb for MAF
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Call these guys and order some straighteners cut to the diameter of the inlet pipes. Install (with epoxy) directly before the MAFs. That flutter will go away.
Honeycomb for MAF |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: http://www.cfzclub.com/
Posts: 1,524
Drives: Angry
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lexington Ky #BBN
Age: 48
Posts: 1,156
Drives: Supercharged
Rep Power: 17 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
the honeycomb may be the ticket to get the air going through the tubes right but I still believe blocking direct air especially to the lower filter is the real fix otherwise you will always have the lower MAF reading higher than the upper even though it will always be the same going into the engine.
__________________
MY 2009 SC BUILD. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Base Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 99
Drives: 13 370 6MT sport tou
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Sounds like a philosophical/existential debate! But I agree that honeycombs or extended intake tubes would probably help. I prefer the Honeycomb option theoretically if only because the added weight at the nose of this already nose heavy car would be less. BTW I am currently in communication with Stillen on this issue and they are working on it as we speak. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I plan on putting some 4:1 or 5:1's in my intakes when I rebuild them. Should clean up the idle. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Oh, and you'll probably need a re-tune, because likely your tuner has used fuel compensation to get around weird readings from your MAF sensors, so they'll need to kinda start over once you stabilize MAF response.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: http://www.cfzclub.com/
Posts: 1,524
Drives: Angry
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Base Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 99
Drives: 13 370 6MT sport tou
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth
Posts: 3,349
Drives: Noisily.
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
That's why he would have used fuel compensation to even it out. Or it may be identical, who can say without trying? haha Edit: To clarify what I mean, lets say that @ WOT you start at 1.2v around 2k RPM and by redline you're reading 4.6v. Then you straighten out your airflow and now you're getting 0.9v at 2k RPM and by redline you're at 4.8v. Because the turbulence compressed your delta V over the rev range, and now that the turbulence isn't there, you're getting accurate flow numbers. But because your tuner set up your fueling tables based on that 1.2v-4.6v spread, you've got inaccurate fueling data throughout the rev range. See what I mean? (this is all theoretical, numbers picked at random) Last edited by Sh0velMan; 02-19-2013 at 02:28 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pensacola Florida
Posts: 1,696
Drives: Awesome Car
Rep Power: 27 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
2 Inlets on the Y: Inside Dia 2 1/2 Outside Dia 2 7/8 Single outlet on the Y Inside Dia 2 5/8 Outside Dia 3 Reducer Boot from Y to SC intake: 2 1/2 SC outlet: Inside 2 3/8 Outside 2 7/8 Intake tube from SC to Throttle Bodies: From SC side 2 5/8 From (2) throttle body side 2 1/2 Of note, the center of the MAF Mount is 2 inched from the K&N filter. If you need more let me know! Hope this helps..
__________________
Did new cool science stuff to the car !!!
http://www.the370z.com/mazoc/99606-z...y-14-17-a.html http://www.the370z.com/diy-section-d...-w-videos.html Last edited by Nut_N_Much; 02-19-2013 at 08:47 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long Term Update- '09 Sport 40K miles | Zxces50 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 21 | 05-13-2012 11:54 PM |
Royal Purple. Engine Damage In The Long Term? | CharleyGFX | Engine & Drivetrain | 73 | 08-16-2011 03:55 PM |
R&T Long Term Test Update | spearfish25 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 33 | 12-26-2009 09:29 AM |
R&T 370Z long term test | spearfish25 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 7 | 08-02-2009 01:16 AM |
Road and Track Long Term Test | jpit | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 1 | 06-25-2009 09:59 PM |