Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Forced Induction (http://www.the370z.com/forced-induction/)
-   -   *****Fast Intentions "Twin Turbo Kit" is here***** (http://www.the370z.com/forced-induction/65737-fast-intentions-twin-turbo-kit-here.html)

LukasC 02-11-2013 10:14 AM

Awesome Tony! Looks very promising! And those are good goals and numbers especially on relatively low boost!

BlkNismo 02-11-2013 10:26 AM

What size oil cooler is this car running?

tower74 02-11-2013 10:40 AM

Just wow is all I can say. It might be another year before I dip my toes back into the FI pond but this kit makes me want to dive in head first and say f×ck it!!! Very nice sir

ZMan8 02-11-2013 10:49 AM

:excited:

F.I. Inc. 02-11-2013 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlkNismo (Post 2159427)
What size oil cooler is this car running?

We currently have the Setrab 25 row on the car.

enkei2k 02-11-2013 12:10 PM

I'm curious why you decided to use a GT28RS vs GT2871/GT2876? It has been out for so long now and there are better (although slightly more expensive) alternatives available.

Seems like most TT kits (GTM also for example) use the disco potato, but I just don't get why.

Is it possible to use those instead?

Seb@SZ 02-11-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enkei2k (Post 2159613)
I'm curious why you decided to use a GT28RS vs GT2871/GT2876? It has been out for so long now and there are better (although slightly more expensive) alternatives available.

Seems like most TT kits (GTM also for example) use the disco potato, but I just don't get why.

Is it possible to use those instead?

They are using a much more superior turbo than the normal 2871R. The 2871R is actually not a "great" turbo. The compressor wheel to turbine wheel size difference on the 2871R introduces a very inefficient weak spot on that turbo that will make it laggier and not as responsive. It has too much back pressure as well which is death to any turbocharged motor. If your going to use a 71 wheel you want to step up to a 3071 that uses a larger turbine wheel.

The FI kit uses a much much much better turbo using the new Garrett GTX compressor wheel.

G37sHKS 02-11-2013 03:42 PM

GTX ftmfw!

edub370 02-12-2013 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enkei2k (Post 2159613)
i'm curious why you decided to use a gt28rs vs gt2871/gt2876? it has been out for so long now and there are better (although slightly more expensive) alternatives available.

Seems like most tt kits (gtm also for example) use the disco potato, but i just don't get why.

Is it possible to use those instead?

question answer

Lower cost is a big driving factor when making fi kits for the masses as well

FPenvy 02-12-2013 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by F.I. Inc. (Post 2159067)
[SIZE="3"]Question: What is the turbo configuration on this car? What stage will this be and are there any plans to test other configurations?

Answer: Garrett GTX 2867R w/Tial .86 AR (External Wastegate) I have to be honest, we were told by a lot of people that the 2867's along with the .86 AR might have lag down low. Believe me when I tell you, that is not the case. This car ramps the boost in so hard with the current setup that we have to get a boost controller on it just to delay the boost and regulate it, especially down low. We know that a big contributing factor to this is the design of the manifolds and overall efficiency of the kit. As far as what stage this is, I would call it a no stage. These 2867's are not even being utilized to half of their potential at this boost level. These turbo's will shine much better in a higher boost and horsepower application. We have no plans to step down to the "smaller" Tial .64 AR. On street tires this current setup is virtually unusable in 1st and 2nd gear. We plan on doing some dyno testing in the coming weeks by only changing to the GT28RS. This will be our "Stage 1" which will be outlined below. Here is what we currently plan to offer in terms of stages:

Stage 1: GT2860RS "aka" GT28RS w/ Tial .86 AR (Low to mid boost applications and much more affordable turbo's with non billet impellers.)

Stage 2: GTX2860 w/ Tial .86 AR

Stage 3: GTX2863 w/ Tial .86 AR

"Possibly" Stage 4: GTX2867 w/ Tial .86 AR

Every stage will come with:

-Twin Tial V-banded 38mm wastegates (Optional water cooled for you road racers.)
-Twin Tial Q Blow Off Valves.

if i'm reading this correctly the test car has the stage 4 setup? just curious since it's only made just under 500whp so far with 7.5psi i'm interested in seeing how much they gain with higher boost. other stage 2's have made 550WHP at 9-12psi so if this is stage 4 im waiting to see the end results.

Scribe 02-12-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 2161149)
if i'm reading this correctly the test car has the stage 4 setup? just curious since it's only made just under 500whp so far with 7.5psi i'm interested in seeing how much they gain with higher boost. other stage 2's have made 550WHP at 9-12psi so if this is stage 4 im waiting to see the end results.

You have to not think in terms of "stages" as there is no hard and fast conventions for what it corresponds with. That term has stuck and is pretty much the least informative marketing speak. It's supposed to be a shortcut for indicating a difference between two products that are similar. You can't use it to compare across anything other than a single product line and it doesn't mean anything between manufacturers or even between two product lines of the same manufacturer.

Stage one for one company might be stage four for another. For example, as a manufacturer I can have a stage one coffee mug (guess what I'm drinking) and a stage two coffee mug. What does that tell you? Nothing. It could be the capacity, the thermal properties, or even the addition of a "World's Greatest Jackass" logo. Now assume another coffee mug maker says they have a stage seven coffee mug. What does that mean? Does it mean that it's better than my stage two mug? Does it have a missile launcher? Who knows. Okay, now say that I (still making coffee mugs) now make a stage one and two water bottle... still tells you nothing.

It's better to think of these things in terms of their actual properties. In the case of turbo kits, it's things like the CFM and spool properties of the turbochargers. Yeah, it requires being more informed on what all those numbers mean and how to read a compressor map, but it's the only way to really differentiate these things.

Oh and to answer your question, the exhaust has a huge part to do with their results. Look at the difference between the power achieved by any kit with the stock versus a full 3" exhaust. It's massive (usually the difference between 475-550whp setups) because turbos work off of a pressure differential.There are other things to consider as well, beyond just initial power numbers on a choked system with no boost controller.

ironhide 02-12-2013 09:40 AM

All I gotta say is this man knows his stuff

FPenvy 02-12-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scribe (Post 2161161)
You have to not think in terms of "stages" as there is no hard and fast conventions for what it corresponds with. That term has stuck and is pretty much the least informative marketing speak. It's supposed to be a shortcut for indicating a difference between two products that are similar. You can't use it to compare across anything other than a single product line and it doesn't mean anything.

Stage one for one company might be stage four for another. For example, as a manufacturer I can have a stage one coffee mug (guess what I'm drinking) and a stage two coffee mug. What does that tell you? Nothing. It could be the capacity, the thermal properties, or even the addition of a "World's Greatest Jackass" logo. Now assume another coffee mug maker says they have a stage seven coffee mug. What does that mean? Does it mean that it's better than my stage two mug? Does it have a missile launcher? Who knows.

i was more or less showing curiosity in what these snails can produce when they are turned up a bit and with the 3" exhaust added. i understand the marketing lingo with differences from company to company.

http://www.aquariumforum.com/customa...atar2429_1.gif

Scribe 02-12-2013 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 2161178)
i was more or less showing curiosity in what these snails can produce when they are turned up a bit and with the 3" exhaust added. i understand the marketing lingo with differences from company to company.

http://www.aquariumforum.com/customa...atar2429_1.gif

I apologize for expanding my original response while you were typing.

To answer your question then, the GT28RS has done well in single, small displacement setups (1.8-2.2L setups putting down 330whp). Thinking of the 370Z as two 1.85L 3 cylinder engines, you could roughly project that you could get much more out of two GT28RS. There are other factors to consider that would prevent you from cranking up the boost and maxing out these turbos.

That said, these turbos are probably the best match for the 370Z engine without diving into the internals of the VQ37. You don't need a bigger turbo because you can't up the boost (compression too high) and you can't make more power (connecting rods).

enkei2k 02-12-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seb@SZ (Post 2159990)
They are using a much more superior turbo than the normal 2871R. The 2871R is actually not a "great" turbo. The compressor wheel to turbine wheel size difference on the 2871R introduces a very inefficient weak spot on that turbo that will make it laggier and not as responsive. It has too much back pressure as well which is death to any turbocharged motor. If your going to use a 71 wheel you want to step up to a 3071 that uses a larger turbine wheel.

The FI kit uses a much much much better turbo using the new Garrett GTX compressor wheel.

Yes, I understand that the GTX is better, but they're using that for the upper stage TT kits, I was more questioning the 'stage 1' kit, since that's what I will most likely be getting in the future. Thank you for your response though, learn something new every day

Quote:

Originally Posted by edub370 (Post 2161129)
question answer

Lower cost is a big driving factor when making fi kits for the masses as well

I suppose, but it's a small difference (~$100 or so) between the two. I guess the GT28RS would be better for DD purposes compared to the 2871 anyway.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2