![]() |
Originally Posted by Isamu right now I am making 508whp, and 404wtq. the goal is to get the torque more inline with the hp. I don't know if you have
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 120 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
All you are doing to bring them closer is moving the powerband down, based on the definition of HP/TQ. You can do (effectively) the same thing by shortening the rear gear. If you shorten the rear gear to 4.64 (really short), you'd get effectively the same feel as if you'd kept the stock rear gear, and had 508tq. Of course, you wouldn't want to go that short, but you get the point. You've got enough in the way of CR gears that you should be able to get away with something pretty short for track use. Trying to fix your problem with a turbo kit means you are trying to improve the piping issues, and having to run a more expensive turbo with a broader efficiency curve. While it would be nice to have those things, I can't imagine going from one single to another, especially before you identify your real issues on track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DIY: Greddy Turbo Aluminum Oil Pan as an additional oil cooling option | wind.zero | DIY Section (Do-It-Yourself) | 26 | 06-15-2020 04:27 PM |
Twin Turbo vs. Single Turbo V6: A Dissertation | Mike@GTM | Forced Induction | 115 | 08-14-2014 09:04 PM |
New Single Turbo Option.. yes please | Isamu | Forced Induction | 108 | 05-09-2012 08:07 AM |
New CAI option | 90 ST | Intake/Exhaust | 21 | 03-26-2012 11:26 PM |