![]() |
I'm leaning toward a SC over a turbo. I think it's time to charge up the bee!! (well almost... about another 4 months) Anyway, my understanding is that a roots
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So Cal baby!
Age: 52
Posts: 5,964
Drives: with passion
Rep Power: 322 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I'm leaning toward a SC over a turbo. I think it's time to charge up the bee!! (well almost... about another 4 months)
Anyway, my understanding is that a roots or twin screw is a more efficient power source than a centrifugal SC on low idle. Does anyone manufacture either of those types? Does it really make that much difference? I am really liking the stage II GTM and will most likely go that route with a pulley swap if I cannot find a roots type (if it even makes sense over a centrifugal). Any education here would be appreciated. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MPG with a supercharger | pokeyl | Forced Induction | 48 | 09-21-2013 12:34 AM |
Supercharger Types | SDTANMAN92 | Forced Induction | 3 | 05-17-2011 07:55 AM |
RAM Supercharger | sgthanzo | Intake/Exhaust | 16 | 07-18-2010 08:09 PM |
Titan supercharger | madmocasin | Forced Induction | 41 | 11-09-2009 01:23 AM |